Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/In re Hykel

In re Hykel

884 A.2d 842, 584 Pa. 449, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2440
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 26, 2005·No. No. 713 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published

Opinion

[450]*450 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated July 8, 2005, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hykel, 884 A.2d 842, 584 Pa. 449, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2440 (Pa. 2005).

884 A.2d 842 (In re Hykel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.