In re Hykel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Hykel

792 A.2d 1245

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 23, 2002·No. No. 713 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2002, a Rule having been entered by this Court on December 6, 2001, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing John J. Hykel to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and, [1246]*1246upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; John J. Hykel is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa. R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2002, a Rule having been entered by this Court on December 6, 2001, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing John J. Hykel to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and, [1246]*1246upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; John J. Hykel is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa. R.D.E.

In re Hykel, 792 A.2d 1245 (Pa. 2002).

Pincite

792 A.2d 1245 (In re Hykel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.