In re Hykel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Hykel

792 A.2d 1245, 568 Pa. 96, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 522

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 23, 2002

DocketNo. 713 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 792 A.2d 1245 (In re Hykel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hykel, 792 A.2d 1245, 568 Pa. 96, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 522 (Pa. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2002, a Rule having been entered by this Court on December 6, 2001, pursuant to [97]*97Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing John J. Hykel to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and, upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; John J. Hykel is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2002, a Rule having been entered by this Court on December 6, 2001, pursuant to [97]*97Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing John J. Hykel to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and, upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; John J. Hykel is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

792 A.2d 1245, 568 Pa. 96, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hykel-pa-2002.