Home/Ohio Supreme Court/In re H.V.

In re H.V.

8 N.E.3d 965, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1497
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re H.V.. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 Ohio St. 3d 408 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 14, 2014·No. 2012-1688·Published

Opinion

Lorain App. Nos. 11CA010139 and 11CA010140, 2012-Ohio-3742. Reported in_ Ohio St.3d_, 2014-Ohio-812, 7 N.E.3d 1173. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent. French, J., dissents and would grant reconsideration on Proposition of Law No. I.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re H.V., 8 N.E.3d 965, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1497 (Ohio 2014).

8 N.E.3d 965 (In re H.V.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re H.V.
2014 Ohio 812 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2014)
In re H.V.
2012 Ohio 3742 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)