In re Hutszpa Cab Corp.

133 A.D.2d 511, 519 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49969

This text of 133 A.D.2d 511 (In re Hutszpa Cab Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Hutszpa Cab Corp., 133 A.D.2d 511, 519 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49969 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

Kane, J. P.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 30, 1986, which assessed the employer for additional contributions for the period from April 1, 1980 through December 31, 1982.

The decision should be affirmed (see, Matter of Enelra Cab Corp. [Roberts], 132 AD2d 864). Moreover, we have reviewed the employer’s contention that it was denied a fair hearing because its president was not provided with a translator and find it to be without merit. The record reveals that the employer’s president had no difficulty understanding or answering the questions put to him. Further, no request for a translator was made by the employer’s president.

Decision affirmed, without costs. Kane, J. P., Main, Casey, Weiss and Mikoll, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Enelra Cab Corp.
132 A.D.2d 864 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 A.D.2d 511, 519 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hutszpa-cab-corp-nyappdiv-1987.