In re Hurwitz

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Hurwitz

632 A.2d 270, 134 N.J. 199, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 1268

DecidedOctober 13, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 632 A.2d 270 (In re Hurwitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hurwitz, 632 A.2d 270, 134 N.J. 199, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 1268 (N.J. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

DAVID P. HURWITZ of FORT LEE, having been ordered to show cause on October 12,1993, why he should not be temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the conclusion of ethics proceedings against him, and prior to the return date of the Order to Show Cause respondent having consented to the entry of an order of temporary suspension, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DAVID P. HURWITZ is suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that DAVID P. HURWITZ be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that DAVID P. HURWITZ comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI