In re Hurt

26 F.3d 130, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21729, 1994 WL 224263
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 26, 1994·No. 92-16538·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

26 F.3d 130

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
In re Norma J. HURT, Debtor.
Milton G. PACE; Nevada-West Systems, Inc.; Zeco, Inc.;
Robertson Wood Products, Inc.; Intermountain Wood Products,
Inc.; Canco, Inc.; Sunway Systems, Inc.; Perco, Inc.;
Kachina Plywood, Inc.; Andrew B. Spain, Appellants,
v.
Norma J. HURT, Appellee.

No. 92-16538.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 12, 1994.
Decided May 26, 1994.

Before: SKOPIL, NORRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges

ORDER*

Milton G. Pace's motion to allow filing of "Supplement To: Appellant's Reply Brief" is denied.

The judgment of the bankruptcy court is affirmed for the reasons stated in the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's Memorandum Decision. We reverse, however, the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's sanctions against all Appellants for bringing a frivolous appeal except the sanction against Appellant Milton G. Pace. We affirm the sanction imposed on Appellant Pace.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hurt, 26 F.3d 130, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21729, 1994 WL 224263 (9th Cir. 1994).

26 F.3d 130 (In re Hurt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BFOW, Inc. v. Hurt (In re Hurt)
144 F. App'x 578 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)