In Re Huntington
137 U.S. 63, 11 S. Ct. 4, 34 L. Ed. 567, 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2067
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 3, 1890·No. Not numbered·Published·Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
Petitioner alleges that he is detained by the United States marshal for the Southern District of New York, by virtue of an order purporting to be an order of the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. The motion for leave to file a petition for the writ of habeas corpus is denied upon the authority of Ex parte Mirzan, 119 U. S. 584, and cases cited.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Huntington, 137 U.S. 63, 11 S. Ct. 4, 34 L. Ed. 567, 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2067 (1890).
137 U.S. 63 (In Re Huntington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ex parte Finn
16 F. Supp. 1 (E.D. Kentucky, 1936)
Dockter v. White
25 F.2d 74 (Eighth Circuit, 1928)
Ex parte Craig
274 F. 177 (Second Circuit, 1921)
Bens v. United States
266 F. 152 (Second Circuit, 1920)
Ex Parte Hudgings
249 U.S. 378 (Supreme Court, 1919)
In Re Lincoln
202 U.S. 178 (Supreme Court, 1906)
Riggins v. United States
199 U.S. 547 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Patterson v. Wilson
1901 OK 41 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1901)
In Re Chapman
156 U.S. 211 (Supreme Court, 1895)