In re Hunter

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Hunter

881 So. 2d 114, 2004 La. LEXIS 2548, 2004 WL 1950282

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Hunter. Read the opinion of the Court — 823 So. 2d 325 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 1, 2004·No. No. 2004-B-1142·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Considering the Motion for Interim Suspension for Threat of Harm filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and the response thereto filed by respondent,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Interim Suspension be and hereby is denied. The ODC has not produced sufficient evidence demonstrating that respondent presently poses a substantial threat of serious harm to the public, as required by Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19.2.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Catherine D. Kimball Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Considering the Motion for Interim Suspension for Threat of Harm filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and the response thereto filed by respondent,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Interim Suspension be and hereby is denied. The ODC has not produced sufficient evidence demonstrating that respondent presently poses a substantial threat of serious harm to the public, as required by Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19.2.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Catherine D. Kimball Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Hunter, 881 So. 2d 114, 2004 La. LEXIS 2548, 2004 WL 1950282 (La. 2004).

Pincite

881 So. 2d 114 (In re Hunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.