In re Hunter

588 F. App'x 232
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2014·No. No. 14-2199·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chase Carmen Hunter petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on her motion for a temporary restraining order. She seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris and deny the mandamus petition. We also deny Hunter’s motion for an injunction pending disposition of this petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hunter, 588 F. App'x 232 (4th Cir. 2014).

588 F. App'x 232 (In re Hunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.