in Re Hunter Buildings and Manufacturing, L.P.

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Hunter Buildings and Manufacturing, L.P.

DecidedOctober 6, 2011

Docket14-11-00857-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re Hunter Buildings and Manufacturing, L.P. (in Re Hunter Buildings and Manufacturing, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re Hunter Buildings and Manufacturing, L.P., (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 6, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-11-00857-CV ____________

IN RE HUNTER BUILDINGS & MANUFACTURING, L.P., ET. AL., Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 215th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2008-50193

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 5, 2011, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relators ask this court to compel the respondent, the Honorable Steven E. Kirkland, presiding judge of the 215th District Court of County, Texas, to vacate orders issued October 4, 2011 denying relators’ (1) “Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s September 23, 2011 Order Denying Defendants’ Motion to Enforce Court Ruling of September 16, 2011 as to additional discovery pertaining to MB Industries, L.L.C.”; and (2) “Motion for Pretrial Determination of What Rights Have Been Redeemed.” With their petition for writ of mandamus, relators filed an emergency motion for temporary relief seeking an immediate stay of the commencement of trial.

Relators have not established entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and deny their emergency motion for stay of the trial proceedings.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Seymore, and Boyce.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 6, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-11-00857-CV ____________

IN RE HUNTER BUILDINGS & MANUFACTURING, L.P., ET. AL., Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 215th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2008-50193

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 5, 2011, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relators ask this court to compel the respondent, the Honorable Steven E. Kirkland, presiding judge of the 215th District Court of County, Texas, to vacate orders issued October 4, 2011 denying relators’ (1) “Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s September 23, 2011 Order Denying Defendants’ Motion to Enforce Court Ruling of September 16, 2011 as to additional discovery pertaining to MB Industries, L.L.C.”; and (2) “Motion for Pretrial Determination of What Rights Have Been Redeemed.” With their petition for writ of mandamus, relators filed an emergency motion for temporary relief seeking an immediate stay of the commencement of trial.

Relators have not established entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and deny their emergency motion for stay of the trial proceedings.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Seymore, and Boyce.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in Re Hunter Buildings and Manufacturing, L.P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hunter-buildings-and-manufacturing-lp-texapp-2011.