In re Hunt

W.D. Michigan

In re Hunt

588 B.R. 496

CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan

DecidedAugust 21, 2018

DocketCase No. DG 17-02283

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 588 B.R. 496 (In re Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hunt, 588 B.R. 496 (Mich. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the fees and expenses itemized in the Fee Application (ECF No. 44) are APPROVED under § 330(a)(4)(B) in the amount of $6,322.49 and DISAPPROVED to the extent of $2,490.00.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Memorandum of Decision and Order pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9022 and LBR 5005-4 upon Jason L. Hunt, A. Todd Almassian, Esq., James M. Keller, Esq., Brett N. Rodgers, Esq., Elizabeth Clark, Esq., and the United States Trustee (by First Class U.S. Mail).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the fees and expenses itemized in the Fee Application (ECF No. 44) are APPROVED under § 330(a)(4)(B) in the amount of $6,322.49 and DISAPPROVED to the extent of $2,490.00.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Memorandum of Decision and Order pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9022 and LBR 5005-4 upon Jason L. Hunt, A. Todd Almassian, Esq., James M. Keller, Esq., Brett N. Rodgers, Esq., Elizabeth Clark, Esq., and the United States Trustee (by First Class U.S. Mail).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

588 B.R. 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hunt-miwb-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack