In re Hunt

W.D. Michigan

In re Hunt

588 B.R. 496

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan·Decided August 21, 2018·No. Case No. DG 17-02283·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the fees and expenses itemized in the Fee Application (ECF No. 44) are APPROVED under § 330(a)(4)(B) in the amount of $6,322.49 and DISAPPROVED to the extent of $2,490.00.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Memorandum of Decision and Order pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9022 and LBR 5005-4 upon Jason L. Hunt, A. Todd Almassian, Esq., James M. Keller, Esq., Brett N. Rodgers, Esq., Elizabeth Clark, Esq., and the United States Trustee (by First Class U.S. Mail).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the fees and expenses itemized in the Fee Application (ECF No. 44) are APPROVED under § 330(a)(4)(B) in the amount of $6,322.49 and DISAPPROVED to the extent of $2,490.00.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Memorandum of Decision and Order pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9022 and LBR 5005-4 upon Jason L. Hunt, A. Todd Almassian, Esq., James M. Keller, Esq., Brett N. Rodgers, Esq., Elizabeth Clark, Esq., and the United States Trustee (by First Class U.S. Mail).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

In re Hunt, 588 B.R. 496 (Mich. 2018).

Pincite

588 B.R. 496 (In re Hunt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related