In re Hunt

148 A.3d 1174, 2016 D.C. App. LEXIS 417, 2016 WL 6659498
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 10, 2016
DocketBar Registration No. 464929, DDN: 137-16; No. 16-BG-812
StatusPublished

This text of 148 A.3d 1174 (In re Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Hunt, 148 A.3d 1174, 2016 D.C. App. LEXIS 417, 2016 WL 6659498 (D.C. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Maryland for a period of sixty days, this court’s August 26, 2016, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why he should not be suspended for a period of sixty days as reciprocal discipline, the statement of respondent asking that the court not suspend him, the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and respondent’s D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit filed on September 22, 2016, it is

ORDERED that Larry D. Hunt is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of sixty days, nunc pro tunc to September 22, 2016.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 A.3d 1174, 2016 D.C. App. LEXIS 417, 2016 WL 6659498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hunt-dc-2016.