Home/California Supreme Court/In re Hunt

In re Hunt

37 P. 206, 103 Cal. 355, 1894 Cal. LEXIS 777
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 3, 1894
DocketNo. 21143
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 37 P. 206 (In re Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Hunt, 37 P. 206, 103 Cal. 355, 1894 Cal. LEXIS 777 (Cal. 1894).

Opinions

The Court.

The children above named having been brought before the court by writ of habeas corpus, and the court being fully advised as to the matter, it is hereby ordered that said minor children be discharged from the custody of Frank Kane, and restored to the custody of the petitioner.

The father and mother, being the natural guardians of a child, can be deprived of the custody of its person only by a proceeding under section 203 of the Civil Code.

The proceeding by which the superior court has committed these children to the custody of a stranger is wholly unauthorized.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Adoption of Lauren D.
67 Cal. Rptr. 3d 325 (California Court of Appeal, 2007)
State of California v. Superior Court
86 Cal. App. 3d 475 (California Court of Appeal, 1978)
Estate of Tetsubumi Yano
206 P. 995 (California Supreme Court, 1922)
People v. Schlott
122 P. 846 (California Supreme Court, 1912)
In Re Lundberg
77 P. 156 (California Supreme Court, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 P. 206, 103 Cal. 355, 1894 Cal. LEXIS 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hunt-cal-1894.