In re Hummer

188 P.3d 952, 286 Kan. 744, 2008 Kan. LEXIS 346
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJuly 24, 2008
DocketBar Docket No. 19298
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 188 P.3d 952 (In re Hummer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Hummer, 188 P.3d 952, 286 Kan. 744, 2008 Kan. LEXIS 346 (kan 2008).

Opinion

In a letter dated July 8, 2008, to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, respondent Clay F. Hummer of Grapevine, Texas, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in the state of Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 217 (2007 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 330).

At the time the respondent surrendered his license, a formal hearing had been held and the decision of a hearing panel was pending on a complaint in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 211 (2007 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 304). The complaint concerned allegations of misconduct that respondent violated KRPC 8.4(c), (d), and (g) of the Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct as the result of his criminal conviction of nine counts of violating a court’s no stalking order and one count of computer trespass.

This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that the surrender of the respondent’s license should be accepted and that the respondent should be disbarred.

It Is Therefore Ordered that Clay F. Hummer be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas, and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of Clay F. Hummer from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the official Kansas Reports, that the costs herein shall be assessed to the respondent, and that the respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2007 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 337).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Hummer
482 P.3d 1113 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 P.3d 952, 286 Kan. 744, 2008 Kan. LEXIS 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hummer-kan-2008.