In re Hummel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Hummel

886 A.2d 222

DecidedOctober 14, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 886 A.2d 222 (In re Hummel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hummel, 886 A.2d 222 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED based on 25 P.S. § 8157(a), and this case is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas for a hearing on the merits. The trial court is instructed to cumulate such write-in ballots cast in the primary election as are in accordance with 25 P.S §§ 3062, 3063, 3155, Appeal of McCracken, 370 Pa. 562, 88 A.2d 787 (1952), and Dayhoff v. Weaver, 808 A.2d 1002, 1011 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002). Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED based on 25 P.S. § 8157(a), and this case is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas for a hearing on the merits. The trial court is instructed to cumulate such write-in ballots cast in the primary election as are in accordance with 25 P.S §§ 3062, 3063, 3155, Appeal of McCracken, 370 Pa. 562, 88 A.2d 787 (1952), and Dayhoff v. Weaver, 808 A.2d 1002, 1011 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002). Jurisdiction relinquished.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

886 A.2d 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hummel-pa-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack