In re Hummel

60 A.3d 493, 213 N.J. 61, 2013 WL 781988, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 185
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 28, 2013
StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.3d 493 (In re Hummel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Hummel, 60 A.3d 493, 213 N.J. 61, 2013 WL 781988, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 185 (N.J. 2013).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-248 and DRB 12-297, recommending on the records certified to the Board pursuant to Rule l:20-4(f) (default by respondent), that CHRISTOPHER P. HUMMEL of FAIR-VIEW, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since January 20, 2011, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months for his unethical conduct found in DRB 12-297, for violating RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities) and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and disbarred for his unethical conduct found in DRB 12-243, for violating RPC 1.15(a) (knowing misappropriation of escrow funds) and the principles of In re Wilson, 81 N.J. 451, 409 A.2d 1153 (1979), and In re Hollendonner, 102 N.J. 21, 504 A.2d 1174 (1985);

[62]*62And CHRISTOPHER P. HUMMEL having failed to appear on the Order directing him to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CHRISTOPHER P. HUMMEL be disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that in view of respondent’s disbarment for the unethical conduct in DRB 12-248, the decision of the Disciplinary Review Board in DRB 12-297 is dismissed as moot; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that CHRISTOPHER P. HUMMEL be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Wilson
409 A.2d 1153 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1979)
Matter of Hollendonner
504 A.2d 1174 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 A.3d 493, 213 N.J. 61, 2013 WL 781988, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hummel-nj-2013.