in Re Humberto Licea
This text of in Re Humberto Licea (in Re Humberto Licea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-12-00561-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE HUMBERTO LICEA
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1 Relator, Humberto Licea, pro se, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus alleging
that the presiding judge of the 347th Judicial District Court of Nueces County, Texas,
abused her discretion by denying his “Motion for Leave to File For a Forensic D.N.A.
Testing” [sic] and denying his request for appointment of counsel in connection with his
request for DNA testing.
Having reviewed and fully considered relator’s petition, this Court is of the opinion
1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying [mandamus] relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”). that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief requested and that the petition
should be denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of
mandamus is DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Do Not Publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 1st day of October, 2012.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Humberto Licea, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-humberto-licea-texapp-2012.