In re Hulshof

118 N.Y.S. 1114
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1909·Published

Opinion

PER CtJRIAM.

It is not made apparent that the Davis law is applicable to teachers of special subjects, such as German. Irrespective~ therefore, of the question of laches, it seems to the that petitioner is not even entitled to an alternative writ. Motion denied. See also, 130 App. Div. 903, 115 N. Y. Supp. 1139; 131 App. Div. 903, 115 N. Y. Supp. 1138.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hulshof, 118 N.Y.S. 1114 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1909).

118 N.Y.S. 1114 (In re Hulshof) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.