In re Hulshof
118 N.Y.S. 1114
This text of 118 N.Y.S. 1114 (In re Hulshof) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Hulshof, 118 N.Y.S. 1114 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1909).
Opinion
It is not made apparent that the Davis law is applicable to teachers of special subjects, such as German. Irrespective~ therefore, of the question of laches, it seems to the that petitioner is not even entitled to an alternative writ. Motion denied. See also, 130 App. Div. 903, 115 N. Y. Supp. 1139; 131 App. Div. 903, 115 N. Y. Supp. 1138.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
118 N.Y.S. 1114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hulshof-nysupct-1909.