In re Hulnick

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Hulnick

841 A.2d 1030

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 18, 2003

DocketNo. 980 Disciplinary Docket No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 841 A.2d 1030 (In re Hulnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hulnick, 841 A.2d 1030 (Pa. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 18th day of December, 2003, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated October 2, 2003, the Petition for Reinstatement is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 18th day of December, 2003, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated October 2, 2003, the Petition for Reinstatement is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

841 A.2d 1030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hulnick-pa-2003.