In Re Huling

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

In Re Huling

1910 OK CR 159, 109 P. 576, 4 Okla. Crim. 89, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 20

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided June 8, 1910·No. No. A-723.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The facts in this case are in all respects identical with those in case No. A-724, In re W. C. Jones, infra, 109 Pac. 570. This petitioner was convicted for violating the same ordinance of the town of Eldorado which Jones was charged with violating; and he makes identically the same contention made by Jones. The decision in that case is controlling in this case.

The writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued in this case will therefore be discharged, and' the petitioner remanded to the custody of the town marshal of Eldorado. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The facts in this case are in all respects identical with those in case No. A-724, In re W. C. Jones, infra, 109 Pac. 570. This petitioner was convicted for violating the same ordinance of the town of Eldorado which Jones was charged with violating; and he makes identically the same contention made by Jones. The decision in that case is controlling in this case.

The writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued in this case will therefore be discharged, and' the petitioner remanded to the custody of the town marshal of Eldorado. It is so ordered.

In Re Huling, 1910 OK CR 159, 109 P. 576, 4 Okla. Crim. 89, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 20 (Okla. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

1910 OK CR 159 (In Re Huling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related