In re Hughley
918 N.E.2d 1010, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1402
Opinion
On September 16, 2009, this court found Kevin Hughley to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prae.R. XIV(5)(B). This court further ordered that Hughley was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. On December 18, 2009, Hughley submitted a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus. Upon review of the proffered motion for leave,
It is ordered by the court that Kevin Hughley’s motion for leave is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Hughley, 918 N.E.2d 1010, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1402 (Ohio 2009).
918 N.E.2d 1010 (In re Hughley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Disciplinary Counsel v. Murraine
2011 Ohio 5795 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)