in Re Hughland Chadric Wooten
This text of in Re Hughland Chadric Wooten (in Re Hughland Chadric Wooten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed as Moot and Memorandum Opinion filed August 21, 2012.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-12-00692-CR
IN RE HUGHLAND CHADRIC WOOTEN, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 176th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1331218
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On July 30, 2012, relator Hughland Chadric Wooten filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Shawna Reagin, presiding judge of the 176th District Court of Harris County, to set aside her order setting certain conditions of relator’s bond, and revoking relator’s bond. On August 1, 2012, relator filed a motion to dismiss the petition because the bond was lawfully forfeited for failure to appear.
Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Frost, McCally, and Busby. Do Not Publish — TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Hughland Chadric Wooten, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hughland-chadric-wooten-texapp-2012.