In Re Hughes

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In Re Hughes

351 A.2d 345, 69 N.J. 116, 1976 N.J. LEXIS 241

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJanuary 26, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 351 A.2d 345 (In Re Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Hughes, 351 A.2d 345, 69 N.J. 116, 1976 N.J. LEXIS 241 (N.J. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

John E. Hughes has been a member of the bar of this State since October, 1938. In November, 1974, he pleaded nolo contendiere to one count of a multi-count information filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Thereupon the other counts were dismissed. The charges included the failure to file, within time, income tax returns for the years 1967, 1968 and 1969 as well as employer’s quarterly Federal tax returns during the period September 30, 1967 to December 31, 1969. At the time of the hearing before the Essex County Ethics Committee all returns had been filed and all taxes had been paid or were then in process of payment.

Respondent, during his professional career, has been primarily a trial lawyer. As such, he has achieved an enviable reputation. In early 1958 he suffered the first of a series of recurring and delibitating heart attacks. It became increasingly difficult for him to withstand the rigors of an active trial practice. He underwent periodic hospitalizations and was required by his physician to spend much time resting at home. He was forced to curtail very substantially his pro *118 fessional activity. Unfortunately he had no insurance to • help pay the heavy expenses incurred by his illness. Respondent’s wife, a registered nurse, resumed her professional calling in order to help pay the education bills of their children.

The respondent insists he had every intention of meeting his tax obligations as soon as he was able and points out that he voluntarily brought his delinquencies to the attention of the Internal Revenue Service while an audit of his 1966 tax return was in progress.

In the light of all of the facts before us, we have concluded that respondent’s conduct merits a suspension from the practice of law for a period of six months.

For suspension for six months—Justices Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford and Schreiber and Judge Con-ford—6.

Opposed—None.

ORDER

It is ordered that John E. Hughes of Glen Ridge be suspended from the practice of law for six months and until further order of the Court, effective February 2, 1976; and it is further

Ordered that John E. Hughes be and hereby is restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

John E. Hughes has been a member of the bar of this State since October, 1938. In November, 1974, he pleaded nolo contendiere to one count of a multi-count information filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Thereupon the other counts were dismissed. The charges included the failure to file, within time, income tax returns for the years 1967, 1968 and 1969 as well as employer’s quarterly Federal tax returns during the period September 30, 1967 to December 31, 1969. At the time of the hearing before the Essex County Ethics Committee all returns had been filed and all taxes had been paid or were then in process of payment.

Respondent, during his professional career, has been primarily a trial lawyer. As such, he has achieved an enviable reputation. In early 1958 he suffered the first of a series of recurring and delibitating heart attacks. It became increasingly difficult for him to withstand the rigors of an active trial practice. He underwent periodic hospitalizations and was required by his physician to spend much time resting at home. He was forced to curtail very substantially his pro *118 fessional activity. Unfortunately he had no insurance to • help pay the heavy expenses incurred by his illness. Respondent’s wife, a registered nurse, resumed her professional calling in order to help pay the education bills of their children.

The respondent insists he had every intention of meeting his tax obligations as soon as he was able and points out that he voluntarily brought his delinquencies to the attention of the Internal Revenue Service while an audit of his 1966 tax return was in progress.

In the light of all of the facts before us, we have concluded that respondent’s conduct merits a suspension from the practice of law for a period of six months.

For suspension for six months—Justices Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford and Schreiber and Judge Con-ford—6.

Opposed—None.

ORDER

It is ordered that John E. Hughes of Glen Ridge be suspended from the practice of law for six months and until further order of the Court, effective February 2, 1976; and it is further

Ordered that John E. Hughes be and hereby is restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

351 A.2d 345, 69 N.J. 116, 1976 N.J. LEXIS 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hughes-nj-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack