in Re Hugh Montgomery Hawthorne IX, Heather Hawthorne Brook, Hagan Hawthorne Seiple, and Hayley Monticia Hawthorne Sauer

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Hugh Montgomery Hawthorne IX, Heather Hawthorne Brook, Hagan Hawthorne Seiple, and Hayley Monticia Hawthorne Sauer

DecidedAugust 2, 2000

Docket04-00-00437-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re Hugh Montgomery Hawthorne IX, Heather Hawthorne Brook, Hagan Hawthorne Seiple, and Hayley Monticia Hawthorne Sauer (in Re Hugh Montgomery Hawthorne IX, Heather Hawthorne Brook, Hagan Hawthorne Seiple, and Hayley Monticia Hawthorne Sauer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re Hugh Montgomery Hawthorne IX, Heather Hawthorne Brook, Hagan Hawthorne Seiple, and Hayley Monticia Hawthorne Sauer, (Tex. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

No. 04-00-00437-CV

In re Hugh Montgomery HAWTHORNE, IX, Heather Hawthorne Brook,

Hagan Hawthrone Seiple, and Hayley Monticia Hawthorne Sauer

Original Mandamus Proceeding Arising from the Probate Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17,814

Honorable Frederick L. Henneke, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Tom Rickhoff, Justice

Alma L. López, Justice

Sarah Duncan, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 2, 2000

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On July 3, 2000, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court has determined that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Therefore, the petition is denied. Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

Relator shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI