In Re Huffmaster
This text of 234 P.3d 208 (In Re Huffmaster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re the Personal Restraint Petition of Jason Adam HUFFMASTER, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Washington.
ORDER
¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices C. Johnson, Sanders, Owens and J. Johnson, considered this matter at its July 6, 2010, Motion Calendar and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petitioner's Motion for Discretionary Review is granted and the matter is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division Two. The Court of Appeals is directed to award the Petitioner statutory attorney fees as costs.
For the Court /s/ Madsen, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICEFree access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 P.3d 208, 169 Wash. 2d 1001, 2010 Wash. LEXIS 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-huffmaster-wash-2010.