In re Hudson

135 S. Ct. 31, 189 L. Ed. 2d 883, 2014 WL 3891619, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4809
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedAugust 11, 2014
DocketNo. D–2796.
StatusPublished

This text of 135 S. Ct. 31 (In re Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Hudson, 135 S. Ct. 31, 189 L. Ed. 2d 883, 2014 WL 3891619, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4809 (U.S. 2014).

Opinion

Daryl J. Hudson, III, of Glenville, West Virginia, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S. Ct. 31, 189 L. Ed. 2d 883, 2014 WL 3891619, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hudson-scotus-2014.