In Re Hudson
Opinion
In Re Hudson,
Thereupon creditors of the Hudson Lumber Company petitioned the circuit court to remove the receivers and authorize suit against one of them for averred fraud, perpetrated in the sale of the 17-acre tract, and subsequent pecuniary benefit realized by one receiver and his brother and brother-in-law; also to recover $6,000, it is claimed, of receivership funds used in the transaction. The circuit judge *Page 276 held our opinion res judicata and denied the petition.
The circuit judge was right. The present effort is but one to carry on litigation without any justification.
The decree, dismissing the petition, is affirmed, with costs to defendants.
NELSON SHARPE, C.J., and POTTER, NORTH, FEAD, BUTZEL, BUSHNELL, and EDWARD M. SHARPE, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
253 N.W. 295 (In Re Hudson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.