In Re Hubert
133 A. 920, 99 N.J. Eq. 886, 14 Stock. 886, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 511
This text of 133 A. 920 (In Re Hubert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In Re Hubert, 133 A. 920, 99 N.J. Eq. 886, 14 Stock. 886, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 511 (N.J. 1926).
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baches.
For affirmance — Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaoh, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Hetpield, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Hosford
98 A.2d 332 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Lasasso v. Lasasso
63 A.2d 526 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1949)
Lundie v. Walker
9 A.2d 783 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
133 A. 920, 99 N.J. Eq. 886, 14 Stock. 886, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hubert-nj-1926.