In re Hubbard

98 F. 710, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 273
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois
DecidedDecember 23, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 98 F. 710 (In re Hubbard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Hubbard, 98 F. 710, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 273 (N.D. Ill. 1899).

Opinion

KOHLSAAT, District Judge

(orally). In this matter a restraining order was heretofore entered ex parte, upon a petition which did not show the purpose of the order of the state court, and this is a motion to modify said restraining order by vacating such portion thereof as restrains the enforcement of the payment of §¡3.50 per week for the support of the bankrupt’s two minor children subsequent to the filing of the petition herein. The bankruptcy act was passed to relieve persons bringing themselves within its provisions from the incubus of hopeless indebtedness, but it was not intended to, nor does it, subvert the higher rule, which casts upon a parent the care and maintenance of his offspring. The "welfare of the state, as also, every principle of law, statutory, natural, and divine, demand that, so long as he has any substance at all, he shall apply it to the maintenance of his children. Creditors, as well as all citizens, are interested in the enforcement of this rule. The restraining order heretofore entered will be vacated as to such portion as restrains the collection of said $3.50 per week subsequent to the filing of the bankrupt’s petition herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Department of Social & Health Services
529 F.2d 1264 (Ninth Circuit, 1976)
In The Matter Of Johnnie Williams
529 F.2d 1264 (Ninth Circuit, 1976)
Whitaker v. Commissioner
33 B.T.A. 865 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1935)
In re Sullivan
262 F. 574 (N.D. New York, 1920)
Schooley v. Schooley
184 Iowa 835 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1918)
Wickersham v. Alabama Steel & Wire Co.
183 F. 498 (N.D. Alabama, 1910)
McKittrick v. Cahoon
62 L.R.A. 757 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 F. 710, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hubbard-ilnd-1899.