in Re Hoyt Duane Forester
This text of in Re Hoyt Duane Forester (in Re Hoyt Duane Forester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2000-CR-4249-A
Honorable Bert Richardson, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
Alma L. López, Justice
Paul W. Green, Justice
Delivered and Filed: January 31, 2001
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
The petitioner, Michael Joseph Kearns, applied to this court for a writ of habeas corpus to command the trial court to release Hoyt Duane Forester from custody. Kearns stated in his petition that he filed a petition in the trial court and that the trial court referred the matter to the magistrate. According to Kearns, the magistrate told him over the telephone that he had no jurisdiction to entertain the petition. The record, however, does not contain an order denying relief in a petition filed in the trial court. As a result, this court has no jurisdiction to act on the petition filed in this cause because the record does not contain an appealable order. The court of appeals has no original habeas jurisdiction. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.05 (Vernon 1977) (courts of appeals not included in list of courts given original habeas corpus jurisdiction); Ex parte Miller, 931 S.W.2d 724, 725 (Tex. App.-Austin 1996, no pet.). Accordingly, Kearns's petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
DO NO PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Hoyt Duane Forester, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hoyt-duane-forester-texapp-2001.