in Re: Howard Vanzandt Williams

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 8, 2004
Docket14-04-00343-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Howard Vanzandt Williams (in Re: Howard Vanzandt Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Howard Vanzandt Williams, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed July 8, 2004

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed July 8, 2004.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-04-00343-CV

IN RE HOWARD VANZANDT WILLIAMS, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

On April 19, 2004, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court.  See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2003); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.  Relator contends the Brazoria County clerk has refused to docket his notice of appeal in cause number 11064*I00 and forward it and other pleadings to the court of appeals.  He also contends that unnamed Atrial court officials@ are refusing to act on his affidavit of indigence and to provide him with a free copy of the record.  Relator has not fully complied with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.

We deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed July 8, 2004.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson, and Hudson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Howard Vanzandt Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-howard-vanzandt-williams-texapp-2004.