in Re Howard Stewart Law, II
This text of in Re Howard Stewart Law, II (in Re Howard Stewart Law, II) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 24, 2023.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-22-00330-CV
IN RE HOWARD STEWART LAW, II, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 309th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021-74082
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On May 5, 2022, relator Howard Stewart Law, II filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In his amended petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Linda Marie Dunson, presiding judge of the 309th District Court of Harris County, to vacate the trial court’s March 14, 2022 temporary order, as it pertains to relator’s monthly child support obligation. Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Poissant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Howard Stewart Law, II, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-howard-stewart-law-ii-texapp-2023.