In re Howard
This text of 91 A.3d 350 (In re Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
On March 14, 2014, this Court’s Disciplinary Counsel filed a petition pursuant to Article III, Rule 6(e) of the Supreme Court Rules of Disciplinary Procedure requesting that the court order the respondent Thomas J. Howard, Jr., to file an answer to a disciplinary complaint. Counsel informed this Court that the respondent had failed to answer the complaint despite several requests that he do so.
On March 24, 2014, we entered an order reprimanding the respondent for his failure to answer that complaint and directing him to file his answer within ten days. The order further provided that his failure to do so would result in his suspension from the practice of law. The respondent was served with that order on March 26, 2014. The respondent has failed to file his answer and is in willful defiance of this Court’s order.
Accordingly, it is ordered that the respondent, Thomas J. Howard, Jr., is suspended from engaging in the practice of law in this state, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 A.3d 350, 2014 WL 1602777, 2014 R.I. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-howard-ri-2014.