In re Howard

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Howard

642 A.2d 1087

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 10, 1994

DocketNo. 286, Disciplinary Docket No. 1; No. 42 DB 79 Disciplinary Board

StatusPublished

This text of 642 A.2d 1087 (In re Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Howard, 642 A.2d 1087 (Pa. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 10th day of June, 1994, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated March 29, 1994, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation as Senior Justice pursuant to Judicial Assignment Docket No. 94 R1800, due to the unavailability of LARSEN, J., see No. 127 Judicial Administration Docket No. 1, filed October 28, 1993.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 10th day of June, 1994, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated March 29, 1994, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation as Senior Justice pursuant to Judicial Assignment Docket No. 94 R1800, due to the unavailability of LARSEN, J., see No. 127 Judicial Administration Docket No. 1, filed October 28, 1993.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

642 A.2d 1087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-howard-pa-1994.