In re Howard

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Howard

935 N.E.2d 424, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1609

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 2010

Docket2010-0346

StatusPublished

This text of 935 N.E.2d 424 (In re Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Howard, 935 N.E.2d 424, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1609 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 97AP-860. On September 24, 2004, this court found Gregory T. Howard to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. 14.5(B). This court further ordered that Howard was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. On October 8, 2010, Howard submitted an application for leave to file a return to the vexatious litigator order instanter. Upon review of the application for leave,

It is ordered by the court that Gregory T. Howard’s October 8, 2010 application for leave is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 97AP-860. On September 24, 2004, this court found Gregory T. Howard to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. 14.5(B). This court further ordered that Howard was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. On October 8, 2010, Howard submitted an application for leave to file a return to the vexatious litigator order instanter. Upon review of the application for leave,

It is ordered by the court that Gregory T. Howard’s October 8, 2010 application for leave is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

935 N.E.2d 424, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-howard-ohio-2010.