In re Howard

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Howard

674 A.2d 988, 143 N.J. 564, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 644

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 6, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court on the motion of respondent for a two-week postponement of the effective date of the three-month suspension ordered by this Court on April 12,1996, which was to be effective May 1,1996;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics having interposed no objection to respondent’s motion;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the motion for a two-week postponement of the effective date of the suspension is hereby granted and OLIVIA C. HOWARD of EAST ORANGE, is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until further Order of the Court, effective May 15,1996.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court on the motion of respondent for a two-week postponement of the effective date of the three-month suspension ordered by this Court on April 12,1996, which was to be effective May 1,1996;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics having interposed no objection to respondent’s motion;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the motion for a two-week postponement of the effective date of the suspension is hereby granted and OLIVIA C. HOWARD of EAST ORANGE, is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until further Order of the Court, effective May 15,1996.

In re Howard, 674 A.2d 988, 143 N.J. 564, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 644 (N.J. 1996).

Pincite

674 A.2d 988 (In re Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related