in Re Howard Kirk Gibbs

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: March 30, 2015
• Docket: 02-15-00070-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 02-15-00070-CV SECOND COURT OF APPEALS FORT WORTH, TEXAS 3/30/2015 5:00:12 PM DEBRA SPISAK CLERK

NO. 02-15-00070-CV FILED IN In the Court of Appeals for the2nd COURT OF APPEALS FORT WORTH, TEXAS Second Court of Appeals District of 03/30/2015 Texas 5:00:12 PM DEBRA SPISAK at Fort Worth Clerk

*********************************** IN RE: HOWARD KIRK GIBBS, Relator

***********************************

REQUEST TO SUPPLEMENT REPORTER’S RECORD

*********************************** From the Probate Court No. 2 Of Tarrant County, Texas ***********************************

Tim G. Sralla tsralla@toase.com Texas Bar No. 18982300 Daniel R. Barrett dbarrett@toase.com Texas Bar No. 01810400 Ashley D. Dierker adierker@toase.com Texas Bar No. 24065399

Members of the firm of: Taylor, Olson, Adkins, Sralla & Elam, L.L.P. 6000 Western Place, Suite 200 Fort Worth, Texas 76107 Telephone No.: (817) 332-2580 Fax No.: (817) 332-4740

ATTORNEYS FOR RELATOR MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

· · · · · · · · · · ··REPORTER'S RECORD · · · · · · · · · ··VOLUME 1 OF 1 VOLUMES · · · · · ··TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. 2005-0000126-2-D · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ··) · · ·IN RE: ESTATE OF BERT· · ··) IN THE PROBATE COURT · · ·HUGHES GIBBS, DECEASED;· ··) · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ··) · · ·CANDACE WALTON AND· · · · ·) · · ·KENNETH GIBBS,· · · · · · ·) · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ··) · · · · · · ·Plaintiffs,· · · ··) · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ··) · · ·VS.· · · · · · · · · · · ··) COURT NO. 2 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ··) · · ·BEVERLY MILLER,· · · · · ··) · · ·INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS· · · ·) · · ·TRUSTEE OF THE GWB· · · · ·) · · ·FRIENDS AND FAMILY TRUST,··) · · ·ALBERT BARCROFT,· · · · · ·) · · ·INDIVIDUALLY AND AS LEGAL··) · · ·REPRESENTATIVE OF PENTEX· ·) · · ·ROYALTY TRUST AND PENTEX· ·) · · ·FOUNDATION, DANNY UNGER,· ·) · · ·AS TRUSTEE OF GBU FRIENDS··) · · ·AND ASSOCIATES TRUST, AND··) · · ·HOWARD KIRK GIBBS,· · · · ·) · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ··) · · · · · · ·Defendants.· · · ··) · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ··) TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ··***** · · · · · · · · · · ·***MOTION HEARING*** · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·***** · · · · · ··On the 16th day of October, 2014, the following · · · ·proceedings came on to be heard in the above-entitled · · · ·and numbered cause before the Honorable · · · ·Patrick Ferchill, Judge presiding, held in Fort Worth, · · · ·Tarrant County, Texas; · · · · · · · · · ··Proceedings reported by machine shorthand.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 Page 2 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · · · ·A P P E A R A N C E S · ·· ·2· · · ·· ·3· · · ··Ms. Christy Lee · ·· · ··Attorney at Law ·4· · · ··SBOT NO. 24052302 · ·· · ··225 East Fireweed Lane ·5· · · ··Suite 200 · ·· · ··Anchorage, Alaska 99503 ·6· · · ··Phone:··(907) 339-9931 · ·· · ··ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS ·7· · · ·· ·8· · · ··Mr. Earl Hargrave · ·· · ··Attorney at Law ·9· · · ··SBOT NO. 24010780 · ·· · ··750 Pipeline Court 10· · · ··Suite 107 · ·· · ··Hurst, Texas 76053 11· · · ··Phone:··(817) 282-0679 · ·· · ··ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT 12· · · ··BEVERLY MILLER · ·· 13· · · ·· 14· · · ·· 15· · · ·· 16· · · ·· 17· · · ·· 18· · · ·· 19· · · ·· 20· · · ·· 21· · · ·· 22· · · ·· 23· · · ·· 24· · · ·· 25· ·

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 3 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·I N D E X · ·· · · · · · · · · · · · ·VOLUME 1 ·2· · · · · · · · · · · ·(MOTION HEARING) · ·· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·Page· ·Vol. ·3· · · ···OCTOBER 16, 2014 ·4· · · ···Announcements. . . . . . . . . . . . . .· · ·4· · ··1 ·5· · · ···Opening statement by Mr. Hargrave. . . .· · ·5· · ··1 ·6· ··Response by Ms. Lee. . . . . . . . . . .· · ·13· · ·1 · ·· ·7· · · ·· ·8· ··Court's Ruling on Motion to Abate . . . .· ··29· · ·1 · ·· ·9· ··Court's Ruling on Motion to Compel and · ···for Sanctions. . . . . . . . . . .··. . .· ··63· · ·1 10· · · ···Adjournment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .· ··69· · ·1 11· · · ···Court Reporter's Certificate. . . . . . .· ··70· · ·1 12· · · ·· 13· · · ·· 14· · · ·· 15· · · ·· 16· · · ·· 17· · · ·· 18· · · ·· 19· · · ·· 20· · · ·· 21· · · ·· 22· · · ·· 23· · · ·· 24· · · ·· 25· ·

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 4 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · · ··P R O C E E D I N G S

·2· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Ladies and gentlemen, the Court

·3· ·has next before it is Cause No. 2005-0000126-2-D.··This

·4· ·is styled Candace Walton and Kenneth Gibbs, plaintiffs,

·5· ·versus Beverly Miller, individually, and as trustee of

·6· ·GWB Family and Friends Trust, et al, defendants.

·7· · · · · · · · ·And we have apparently set for today,

·8· ·according to my docket sheet, we have a -- a motion for

·9· ·abatement, a motion to compel, a motion for sanctions

10· ·and special appearance.

11· · · · · · · · ··So I guess we ought to get everybody's

12· ·names for our record, please, starting with my left.

13· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Howard Gibbs, pro se, your

14· ·Honor.

15· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Earl Hargrave representing

16· ·Ms. Miller.

17· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Christy Lee representing

18· ·Candace Walton and Kenneth Gibbs.

19· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Okay.··So lady and

20· ·gentle -- please be seated.··Lady and gentleman, which

21· ·of those are we going to go forward on, and if so, which

22· ·one first?

23· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··I think the motion to abate

24· ·is the idea, because if I'm successful, then a lot of

25· ·the other stuff is not really relevant.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 5 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Sounds good to me.··And are you

·2· ·going to give argument to the Court or -- I don't

·3· ·suppose you have any witnesses?

·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··No, I don't have any

·5· ·witnesses, argument to the Court.··I'm going to

·6· ·presuppose that you read all the pleadings and I'm just

·7· ·going hit on --

·8· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes.··And you may stand or be

·9· ·seated, whichever makes you more comfortable.

10· · · · · · · · ·And are both parties opposing the motion to

11· ·abate?··I'm sure you are.

12· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, your Honor.

13· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··No, sir, I'm not.

14· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··You're not, okay.··So we have

15· ·one opposition.

16· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Essentially, my motion to

17· ·abate says that this very same matter is being handled

18· ·in another court, not very same, the core of this matter

19· ·is being handled in another court.··Since that motion

20· ·was filed, that court has -- on their own, as I

21· ·understand, decided to transfer the matter from Fannin

22· ·County to a district court in Tarrant County.··I wasn't

23· ·involved with that, but I saw the order that said that.

24· · · · · · · · ·And therefore, the summary judgment motion,

25· ·which I thought was going to be heard a month ago, has

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 6 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·not occurred and I'm not sure when it's going to occur.

·2· · · · · · · · ·But the -- the similarities between the

·3· ·cases are -- the -- what we're going to call the Fannin

·4· ·County court -- was trying to determine the proper split

·5· ·up of the assets of the estate.

·6· · · · · · · · ··Essentially there were four -- your

·7· ·Honor, I have something to go -- some documents to

·8· ·help -- help explain what I'm doing.

·9· · · · · · · · ·If I may approach, your Honor.

10· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes, you may.

11· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Here's Exhibit A.

12· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Look at a visual aid?

13· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Yeah.

14· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Thank you.

15· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··This is very difficult to

16· ·wade your way through.··In Exhibit A, this is the estate

17· ·of Bert Hughes Gibbs.··And 25 percent of the whole

18· ·estate went to another sibling, that's not involved in

19· ·this case.

20· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Your Honor, I'm going to object

21· ·to the admission of this document.··I don't think he

22· ·represents the estate of Bert Gibbs and I'm not quite

23· ·sure what the relevance of this is to a case about

24· ·abating this case.

25· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, let's go ahead and hear

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 7 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·what he has to say, but I'll give you another

·2· ·opportunity to object.··Right now we're just looking at

·3· ·it as a visual aid for the Court --

·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··So you can understand what

·5· ·I'm trying to say.

·6· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Okay.

·7· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Of that 75 percent -- this

·8· ·is Exhibit B.

·9· · · · · · · · ·May I approach, your Honor?

10· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes.

11· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Of the 75 percent, there

12· ·were certain promises made by the other three siblings,

13· ·Mr. Gibbs here and -- and his two siblings sitting in

14· ·the gallery, about how to split that up.

15· · · · · · · · ·And initially they gave up 22.5 percent of

16· ·it to -- to Barcroft, or the guy that came in that was

17· ·going to try to help them out the first time.

18· · · · · · · · ·And of -- and then later on, they gave

19· ·37.5 percent of it to a set of attorneys that were

20· ·successful in undoing -- in straightening out this

21· ·estate.··The 22.5 that went to Barcroft, it's my

22· ·understanding that he's not an attorney, but he's the

23· ·one that bankrolled the attorney that -- that tried to

24· ·do this first.··That's my understanding of his part in

25· ·it.··Leaving 15 percent of the purple part, was the only

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 8 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·thing that was left in the estate for these three

·2· ·children --

·3· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Your Honor, I just would like to

·4· ·assert this document as well, I object to the relevance.

·5· ·I'm still not understanding what the relevance is to

·6· ·this to abate the case.

·7· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Your objection is so noted, but

·8· ·overruled at this time.

·9· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Thank you.

10· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Exhibit C further explains

11· ·what was going on.··In Exhibit C, we're looking at the

12· ·22.5, the light green, and how some of that was assigned

13· ·to a John Skotnik, an attorney that did some kind of a

14· ·service, I'm not exactly sure what Skotnik was doing,

15· ·but he received part out of what went to Barcroft, what

16· ·I would call the unsuccessful attorneys.

17· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Okay.

18· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Okay.··Exhibit D, if I may I

19· ·approach, your Honor?

20· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes.

21· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Exhibit D,

22· ·transfer -- demonstrates what was transferred to the GWB

23· ·Family and Friends Trust, for which my client was a

24· ·trustee.··So this -- the 20.04 percent in purple, the

25· ·part that was left over from the unsuccessful attorney

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 9 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·hiring an attorney, and the 15 percent, that was all

·2· ·that was left over of the original 75 percent in the

·3· ·hands of the -- of the three family members, this shows

·4· ·what was transferred to the trust.

·5· · · · · · · · ·And this is Exhibit E and this is the end

·6· ·of it.

·7· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··And, again, your Honor, I'm

·8· ·objecting.

·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··May I approach, your Honor?

10· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I'll give you a running

11· ·objection, but I'm going to overrule the objection.

12· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Thank you.

13· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··So as 57.19 percent of the

14· ·funds that went to the trust were -- were allocated for

15· ·the unsuccessful attorneys, as I refer to them.

16· · · · · · · · ·There's only 42.81 percent of the money

17· ·left to be spent among -- among the three -- the three

18· ·siblings and this is the reason why my client

19· ·distributed 57.19 percent to the -- to the unsuccessful

20· ·attorneys.··This is what's being discussed down in

21· ·Fannin County, to get the court to rule on these

22· ·calculations that, of course, is being transferred

23· ·somewhere else, probably just between me and the Court,

24· ·probably ought to all be right here, so it can all be

25· ·handled at one time.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 10 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··How did it -- you said it was

·2· ·transferred to a district, you said, in Tarrant County?

·3· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··No --

·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Yes, the paperwork indicates

·5· ·it was transferred -- the Fannin County district court,

·6· ·apparently sua sponte, decided this all needs to be in

·7· ·the district court in Tarrant County.··And I have an

·8· ·order here somewhere --

·9· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I don't mean to interrupt.··I was

10· ·present during the hearing.··Would you mind if I

11· ·interject --

12· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Sure, I don't know how that

13· ·happened.

14· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··And then you can continue?

15· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Sure.

16· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.··We had a hearing on

17· ·September 30th at the district court in Fannin County.

18· ·My motion was filed, a motion to transfer venue, because

19· ·the proper venue should be Tarrant County.

20· · · · · · · · ·The judge heard our arguments and ruled in

21· ·our favor.··And I filed a supplement to -- I filed a

22· ·supplement, your Honor, to this motion, in which I show

23· ·the order approving the motion to transfer and that --

24· ·the "Tarrant County" is actually my handwriting.· ··So

25· ·it is to be transferred.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 11 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·However, the parties have filed a motion

·2· ·for reconsideration.··And I have read the motion for

·3· ·reconsideration, your Honor, and as an officer of the

·4· ·Court, the arguments are 100 percent identical, so I

·5· ·certainly don't think that it will be overruled and stay

·6· ·in Fannin County.

·7· · · · · · · · ·We do have a hearing set for November 12th

·8· ·in Fannin County concerning the motion to reconsider.

·9· ·But it is still our stance and obviously the judge

10· ·believes that the case should be transferred to Tarrant

11· ·County and, of course, as soon as it gets transferred, I

12· ·think the cases should be consolidated, as I argued

13· ·before, and I'm not trying to step in front of him, they

14· ·are not the same cases.··This case is --

15· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··That's --

16· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··You want me to stop.

17· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Yes, I'd rather you just

18· ·explain.

19· · · · · · · · ·May I approach, your Honor?

21· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··This is the order that she's

22· ·discussing.

23· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Thank you.

24· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··As I was saying in my first

25· ·amended motion to abate, that's attached to the original

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 12 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·petition that was being heard in the Fannin County

·2· ·court, and the original petition is all about -- well,

·3· ·there's other things going on, but a declaratory

·4· ·judgment to determine whether these calculations are the

·5· ·way the money should be split up or not.

·6· · · · · · · · ·And because of that -- because of

·7· ·that -- primarily it's my understanding that the primary

·8· ·reason you have for removing my client is because she

·9· ·couldn't explain why she came up with the 57.19 percent

10· ·when she allocated.··There were other problems --

11· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes.

12· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··-- I'm not glossing over,

13· ·but there were other problems, but if it turns out that

14· ·district court determines that that was the proper way

15· ·to do, then this -- then a whole lot of the fussing

16· ·that's been going on in this Court will have been moot,

17· ·because it's my belief the real reason we're here is

18· ·because suddenly the -- well, we're here because people

19· ·are unhappy with how things are going.

20· · · · · · · · ·But in any case, I can imagine that court

21· ·saying -- some district court in Tarrant County saying

22· ·that it's -- she split the money up properly, and then

23· ·this Court has already ruled that she didn't do it

24· ·right, one of the many things, we might have a conflict

25· ·between the two courts.··And that's the core reason for

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 13 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·the abatement.

·2· · · · · · · · ·The abatement also discusses the fact that

·3· ·my opposing counsel has filed some notice of Family

·4· ·Medical Leave Act and I don't really understand how that

·5· ·would work in this case, since she is self employed and

·6· ·she continues to come to court and she continues to make

·7· ·filings.

·8· · · · · · · · ·At that time, I was asking either that, you

·9· ·know, it's abated for that reason or that, you know, we

10· ·just go on, anyway, to have discovery.··And I believe we

11· ·already have a ruling -- a scheduling order that's

12· ·working through, so the family medical leave act does

13· ·not appear to be a problem, your Honor.··The -- I think

14· ·it's been taken care by the fact we have a scheduling

15· ·order or about to have one.

16· · · · · · · · ·My core problem is the -- one of biggest

17· ·issues that we have here is supposed to be handled

18· ·sometime in a district -- district court, of which I

19· ·personally believe it ought to all be handled by the

20· ·same court, but until that -- that court or everything

21· ·is merged into this Court, I think that -- this matter

22· ·here should be abated.

23· · · · · · · · ·Thank you, your Honor.

24· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Your Honor, I would like the

25· ·Court to notice that on July 31st, there was a plea of

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 14 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·abatement with the same arguments from Howard Kirk and

·2· ·the Court overruled that argument.··It's the exact same

·3· ·arguments.

·4· · · · · · · · ·I'm not sure what these exhibits have to do

·5· ·with removing a trustee, getting back assets that were

·6· ·inappropriately taken and terminating this trust that

·7· ·was a tax sham.

·8· · · · · · · · ·And, your Honor, the Fannin County case is

·9· ·over a contract for sale --

10· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Objections, your Honor, to

11· ·the allegation this was a tax scam.··There is no

12· ·evidence before the Court of that.

13· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··There will be, there will be,

14· ·your Honor.··We'll be amending our petition concerning

15· ·the motion to compel.··I have evidence to show it was a

16· ·tax scam, that's why -- you will hear evidence on that.

17· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, at least tax -- tax

18· ·motivation --

19· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··No, your Honor, it is a tax sham,

20· ·it's a shell corporation.··I have -- and you will hear

21· ·that today.

22· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··All right.

23· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Your Honor, is she alleging

24· ·some criminal activity?

25· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I don't know.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 15 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··You will hear that during my

·2· ·motion for -- my motion to compel, your Honor.

·3· · · · · · · · ·So going back with the motion to abate.

·4· ·This is about Al Barcroft and a contract for sale for

·5· ·land.··This has nothing to do -- this is not being

·6· ·heard, these exhibits are not being heard in Fannin

·7· ·County.··We're just going to call it the Fannin County

·8· ·case, that's what we called it, even though there's

·9· ·issue with venue --

10· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··I have no --

11· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Objections.

12· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Describing as Fannin.

13· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.··So the Fannin County

14· ·case --

15· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Right.

16· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··-- the petition specifically

17· ·states that my clients owe him attorney fees that should

18· ·be distributed to him.··It has nothing to do with assets

19· ·that were distributed out of GWB.··We're not arguing

20· ·that.··They're arguing that a contract for sale is

21· ·valid.··That has nothing to do with this case.

22· · · · · · · · ·And in addition, the Court's already ruled

23· ·on the plea of abatement, the exact same arguments, on

24· ·July 31st, and ruled against it.··They just keep wanting

25· ·to abate this and abate it until when?··We have no

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 16 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·Court?··Right now, the Fannin County case is in limbo

·2· ·and that discovery is halted.··And you're going to find

·3· ·out through the rest of the hearings today, that that's

·4· ·their tactic, a delay tactic.

·5· · · · · · · · ·And I'm not quite sure why Mr. Hargrave

·6· ·keeps bringing up the FMLA that was discussed with

·7· ·Morrisett during our scheduling hearing, which I think

·8· ·was August 20th, and I thought we had worked out all

·9· ·those issues.

10· · · · · · · · ·But we're setting depositions.··I never

11· ·refused any requests from Mr. Hargrave, I haven't, you

12· ·know, I've never not responded to him in an adequate

13· ·amount of time, so I'm not quite sure what his complaint

14· ·is.··I did tell Judge Morrisett, my father is very ill

15· ·right now and I just would like to spend time with him

16· ·and all I've asked is that opposing parties please

17· ·doesn't set hearings without consulting with me and that

18· ·they --

19· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Which they really shouldn't --

20· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··They shouldn't do and that was a

21· ·problem --

22· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Should conference with you, if

23· ·they can.

24· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Correct.··And that's what we

25· ·talked about with Judge Morrisett and he was very

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 17 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·adamant about how things were going to go forward, about

·2· ·just being courteous in scheduling, so I'm not sure why

·3· ·that's an issue.

·4· · · · · · · · ·But here is the order, your Honor.··I do

·5· ·not have a copy, if I can approach.

·6· · · · · · · · ·I'm sorry, I do not have another copy.

·7· · · · · · · · ·That is what was given to the Court and

·8· ·it's my understanding has been signed by the Court.

·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··I have a copy.··I have a

10· ·signed copy.

11· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.··And it specifically states

12· ·that the plea in abatement that has been brought before

13· ·this Court has been denied.··So there's the order.··It's

14· ·my understanding, through Judge Morrisett, that you

15· ·signed that order, so we're back here, again, arguing

16· ·the same thing.

17· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I agree.

18· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.··So -- thank you.

19· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··But now, let me ask you this,

20· ·if it is -- if the other case, even though -- well,

21· ·let's just leave as so -- on the fence as to whether or

22· ·not how intertwined and related these may or may not be,

23· ·but if the other case is indeed coming to Tarrant County

24· ·and you do intend to file a motion for consolidation --

25· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 18 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- into the probate court?

·2· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, your Honor.

·3· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Would that be a reason for

·4· ·abatement, in and of itself?

·5· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Why would that be a reason for

·6· ·abatement?

·7· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, I mean, until that's

·8· ·done.

·9· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Well, no, your Honor, it's in

10· ·limbo, though.··We need to move forward on this case,

11· ·because it's only on a motion to reconsider right now

12· ·and their motion to reconsider --

13· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Okay.··So the motion to

14· ·reconsider --

15· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Is for the change of venue.

16· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··So it's possibly a while before

17· ·this case file gets to Tarrant County.

18· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··And they have stated in their

19· ·motion to reconsider that if she doesn't approve it,

20· ·they will file a mandamus, so who knows when that's

21· ·going to be done.

22· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Your Honor, I'm not any part

23· ·of the they said -- said thing.··I'm just saying, I

24· ·would like the Court to consider the motion.··I don't

25· ·know how well the motion was pled and argued the first

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 19 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·time, that was before my time.··But I would point out to

·2· ·the Court, on page -- it's Bates stamp 335 -- is an

·3· ·example of how intertwined the facts are in Fannin

·4· ·County.··They talked about 30 percent share, the

·5· ·20.04 percent, all the different numbers involved in the

·6· ·pie charts I gave you.

·7· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··But it was on attorneys' fees?

·8· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, your Honor.

·9· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··The real crux of it, though, is

10· ·the collection of attorneys' fees.

11· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··And the reason for that is

12· ·under the agreement that the -- that led up -- that got

13· ·us to this point, the -- what we call the unsuccessful

14· ·defense attorneys, he was going to try to -- that guy

15· ·was going try to help this family out.

16· · · · · · · · ·And it said, specifically, in the

17· ·agreement, that the family themselves could go hire

18· ·another attorney, but the other attorney would come out

19· ·of their money, his 30 percent would not be touched --

20· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··But, your Honor, I would like to

21· ·object for him to call Al Barcroft the unsuccessful

22· ·attorney, he's not an attorney.··That's an issue we have

23· ·about Al Barcroft, because he likes to draft legal

24· ·documents without -- practicing law without a license.

25· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··The Court is well

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 20 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·aware Mr. Barcroft is not an attorney.

·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Yeah, I'm using that as a

·3· ·label because -- or the unsuccessful attempt, whatever

·4· ·you want.··It was clear if the unsuccessful -- if

·5· ·Mr. Barcroft and the attorney he hired were unsuccessful

·6· ·and the family went and hired somebody else, they would

·7· ·pay for the somebody else out of their pocket.··It would

·8· ·not affect the 30 percent that was coming to

·9· ·Mr. Barcroft for his efforts.

10· · · · · · · · ·And the attorney's fees that were --

11· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··But don't we have to determine,

12· ·what were Mr. Barcroft's efforts?

13· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··I believe he funded an

14· ·attorney to try to fix this.

15· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Your Honor, I'm not sure if

16· ·that's even relevant, but I don't know what his -- it

17· ·would be for the contract for sale.··For the contract of

18· ·sale, he can say he drafted a document and therefore he

19· ·wants to have it implemented and these were -- these

20· ·were his efforts and this is what he should get.

21· · · · · · · · ·But your Honor, it's not my client's fault

22· ·that this document was drafted or that Mr. Hargrave

23· ·hasn't read the file to see the plea of abatement has

24· ·already been filed.··Judge Morrisett, during the

25· ·August 20th hearing, had already been filed and denied

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 21 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·by this Court.··And it's truly a frivolous motion and my

·2· ·clients are seeking attorney's fees to respond to the

·3· ·motion that's already been drafted, heard in front of

·4· ·this Court, and denied.

·5· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Your -- you get the

·6· ·last -- it's your -- it your argument, it's your motion.

·7· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··I think I covered all the

·8· ·areas --

·9· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··And why did you choose to bring

10· ·this back before the Court again?

11· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··At the time I was bringing

12· ·its back before the Court, we were like two weeks or so

13· ·away from the summary judgment hearing that was supposed

14· ·to be heard the first time in the -- end of last month

15· ·or something.··I'm not sure --

16· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I think he's talking about a

17· ·possible summary judgment hearing in Fannin County, not

18· ·this Court, your Honor.

19· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Not this Court.

20· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··And the new information you're

21· ·purporting to the bring to the Court as to why you

22· ·should have a second shot at a plea in abatement has to

23· ·do with these graphs you've presented?··The court not

24· ·understanding what the case was about, up in Fannin

25· ·County?

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 22 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··I'm not sure -- I'm not sure

·2· ·it was fully explained to the court.··It's a very

·3· ·difficult concept to figure out just why 57.19 percent

·4· ·of it was supposed to go to one side or the other.

·5· · · · · · · · ·And in our emergency hearing that we had,

·6· ·my client was unable to explain that.

·7· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, it sounded like instead

·8· ·of doing a fiduciary task, she did what someone told me,

·9· ·based on her own testimony.

10· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··I under --

11· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··It's certainly part and parcel,

12· ·being a fiduciary, understanding the mathematics behind

13· ·it.··But before you get there, it has to be more than

14· ·somebody telling you what to do it.

15· · · · · · · · ·Fiduciaries are not conduits.··They have

16· ·standalone, as you well know, standalone duties and

17· ·responsibilities that are not waived by law.

18· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··I understand, your Honor.··I

19· ·believe my client was unprepared for that hearing.

20· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes, I think she's unprepared

21· ·to serve as a fiduciary, but that's really not for here

22· ·today.

23· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··That may be , but since that

24· ·hearing, she has recalled that she did talk to an

25· ·attorney.··I know that doesn't have much to do about the

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 23 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·removal, but she does recall having talked to an

·2· ·attorney and the attorney has sent me a letter saying he

·3· ·did talk to her.··It may well have been Skotnik that she

·4· ·talked to.

·5· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··But wouldn't -- whether or not

·6· ·there were any attorney's fees due, wouldn't that be

·7· ·related to how this Court finds in regard to the matter

·8· ·before it, if all these transactions are modified,

·9· ·nullified, whatever you might want to call it, canceled,

10· ·even if they're confirmed, that's still a -- there's a

11· ·possibility there would be no need for the Fannin County

12· ·case, there aren't going to be any attorney's fees.

13· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Apparently I haven't

14· ·explained myself correctly.··My -- my client -- Barcroft

15· ·appears to be arguing that he got less of the money from

16· ·the trust than he should have gotten, because he was

17· ·paying part of the attorney fees that should have been

18· ·paid by the -- by the three siblings.

19· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··And he's suing them for

20· ·attorney fees.

21· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, your Honor.

22· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Right?··That's what he's

23· ·basically suing them for.

24· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Just the one little caveat, that

25· ·I think you'll agree.··Al Barcroft is saying that the

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 24 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·attorney fees that Howard Kirk Gibbs and my two clients

·2· ·are to pay to the estate, of Bert Gibbs' attorneys, he

·3· ·should have received --she should have received more

·4· ·money and they owe him additional money that has nothing

·5· ·to do with the GWB Trust.··It's not the same thing.

·6· ·They are two very different cases.

·7· · · · · · · · ·Now, I agree, I think they should be

·8· ·consolidated just for simplicity sake.··I can't imagine

·9· ·having two juries listen to these two very different

10· ·convoluted things.··I don't understand why removing a

11· ·trustee, getting back assets and terminating a trust has

12· ·anything to do with if my client paid him the

13· ·appropriate amount of attorney fees.

14· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I'm still in agreement with you

15· ·and so I'll deny the plea in abatement.

16· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··And, you honor, I do have --

17· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Did you wish to say something

18· ·for the record?

19· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··I would like to say something,

20· ·if I could.

21· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··You may.··As a pro se, sure.

22· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Whenever we originally made the

23· ·agreement, Ken, Candy and myself with Al Barcroft, we

24· ·agreed to pay him 30 percent from whatever he recovered

25· ·from the estate of my parents.··That was the agreement

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 25 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·to do that.

·2· · · · · · · · ·And at that time, there had already been a

·3· ·final judgment.··It had been way past any time to do any

·4· ·kind of standard reversal or going to the appellate

·5· ·court or anything of that nature, so we had, basically,

·6· ·lost, with about a million dollars judgment against us,

·7· ·from the Denton County court, we've been fighting for a

·8· ·number of years.

·9· · · · · · · · ·And what Al Barcroft said he would do is,

10· ·he said for 30 percent of whatever he could recover for

11· ·us from the estates -- my parents' two estates, what he

12· ·would do, for the 30 percent, he would fund whatever

13· ·could be done to try to reverse the situation, get us

14· ·some inheritance we all lost, plus we had a million

15· ·dollar judgment, just about, against us.

16· · · · · · · · ·So not only losing all my parents -- their

17· ·estate, we had about million dollars that we owed to 4th

18· ·brother, that's in Corpus Christi, Kip Gibbs.

19· · · · · · · · ·So what Al did was, he was going to fund

20· ·all the legal research that was done by Danny Unger.··He

21· ·was going to hire John Skotnik to do the legal work.··Al

22· ·was also, I guess you'd call him a paralegal, so he

23· ·ended up spending, basically, his life savings trying to

24· ·overturn what had been done up in Denton County.

25· · · · · · · · ·Once he got it overturned, the agreement

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 26 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·said very clearly that he got 30 percent, and if us

·2· ·three kids chose to hire someone else, we could, but if

·3· ·we hired someone else, we had to pay the legal fees.

·4· · · · · · · · ·Well, we tried to go the route with -- with

·5· ·John Skotnik, went up here to the Second Court of

·6· ·Appeals, that was not successful.··So what we ended up

·7· ·doing is we decided to go and get a local attorney,

·8· ·which is, Rickey Brantley, and they basically put

·9· ·together what we thought was a dream team of attorneys

10· ·from four different areas of expertise and we ended up

11· ·getting it back in front of the Second Court of Appeals.

12· ·The case was overturned up in Denton County, so now we

13· ·got our inheritance back.

14· · · · · · · · ·And at that point, our agreement with those

15· ·attorneys, these four attorneys, was Ken and Candy and I

16· ·were to pay 50 percent of whatever we get for attorneys'

17· ·fees, that was the contingency fee on that.

18· · · · · · · · ·So we had agreed to pay 30 percent to Al

19· ·and we had, and we had agreed to pay 50 percent to the

20· ·attorneys, and we did.··And I will tell you I could not

21· ·believe how much money we gave up to get this done.··And

22· ·whenever all this rift happened between Candy and Al

23· ·Barcroft and we ended up getting in litigation and went

24· ·in that direction and then this money was pulled out of

25· ·GWB and GBU, I did not think it was right.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 27 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·Once I finally saw the numbers, I relented,

·2· ·I didn't like it, but that's what the contract says.

·3· ·These numbers that Mr. Hargrave here has put forth, I

·4· ·don't like them, but they're numbers.··And if the

·5· ·numbers are wrong, Ms. Lee is an attorney and a CPA, she

·6· ·ought to be able to show where these numbers are

·7· ·incorrect, if, in fact, they're incorrect.··I mean,

·8· ·because I've tried to prove them wrong and I couldn't.

·9· · · · · · · · ·And that's why these numbers, I believe,

10· ·stand upon themselves.··If ever a court looks at all the

11· ·numbers, I believe this is going to be proven.··I don't

12· ·like that 57 percent was taken out of GWB, it took money

13· ·out of my pocket like it did Ken and Candy's, but the

14· ·numbers are the numbers and I'm not willing to steal

15· ·from Al just in order to not go with what the contract

16· ·said.

17· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I think we kind of got off

18· ·track there --

19· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yeah, I'm not sure --

20· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··He is pro se --

21· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE.··I didn't think that it's

22· ·relevant.

23· · · · · · · · ·May I please approach.

24· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes.

25· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I have drafted an order.··And as

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 28 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·you can see from the bottom -- shoot, your Honor, I'm

·2· ·sorry -- number two does specifically talk about how,

·3· ·you know, as this has already been heard once before,

·4· ·this was a frivolous motion and my clients would like

·5· ·attorney fees.

·6· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··I don't think we heard any

·7· ·testimony that said it's frivolous.··The phrase

·8· ·frivolous is a specific term that has a specific meaning

·9· ·to it --

10· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··It has --

11· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··-- basis in law and fact.

12· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··It was actually already filed,

13· ·the exact same arguments, the exact same arguments

14· ·already heard.

15· · · · · · · · ·And even in light of the transfer of venue,

16· ·I thought, for sure, this would be gone and he still

17· ·stood here and argued it.··His whole argument is that it

18· ·should be Fannin County, that's why it should be abated,

19· ·so that case should be heard.··If that case comes to

20· ·Tarrant County, I'm sure the cases will be consolidated.

21· ·Your Honor has already discussed this before, just

22· ·speaking during a hearing, that if they're -- if it

23· ·comes here, it would be consolidated.··So why is he

24· ·still coming in front of the Court wasting our time,

25· ·when the case is coming here.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 29 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, possibly and some day.

·2· ·It still has -- you, yourself, said there's a motion to

·3· ·reconsider and possibly a mandamus, the potential of

·4· ·one.

·5· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Correct.

·6· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I'm still going to deny the

·7· ·plea in abatement and I'm not ready to sanction him with

·8· ·attorneys fees.··This is a complicated case and I think

·9· ·it has some moving parts, anyway, and I'm not ready to

10· ·do that at this time.

11· · · · · · · · ·But, Mr. Gibbs, we still have an issue.··We

12· ·removed the trustee because whether she intended to or

13· ·not, she became a fiduciary under the laws of the state

14· ·of Texas.··And I never heard, frankly, in many many

15· ·years, such deplorable testimony from someone who was

16· ·supposed to be a fiduciary.

17· · · · · · · · ·So it's kind of apples and oranges.··I

18· ·mean, it was a travesty what this woman testified to in

19· ·this Court.

20· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Your Honor, I'm not defending

21· ·Ms. Miller --

22· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··But you're kind acting like I

23· ·should shut everything down and end everything, because

24· ·you're happy with percentages.

25· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··I'm not happy, your Honor --

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 30 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, you accepted some

·2· ·percentages.

·3· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Well, can I change the facts,

·4· ·your Honor?··I don't think I've got the right to do

·5· ·that --

·6· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··No, also you can't change the

·7· ·fact that is this -- this woman for, whatever her

·8· ·motives, voluntarily, well, I suppose, became a

·9· ·fiduciary.··And when she did so, took on a whole mantle

10· ·of Texas case and statutory law, which she clearly, not

11· ·only didn't understand, had very little respect for --

12· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Your Honor --

13· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- like I said, I've never seen

14· ·anybody, layperson or otherwise, do such a pitiful job

15· ·of trying to justify actions that she purportedly took

16· ·as a legal fiduciary.

17· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Your Honor, I'm not defending

18· ·anything she did.··All I'm saying is, the numbers are

19· ·correct.··That's all.··I'm not saying anything about

20· ·Ms. Miller.··I just said these numbers, the

21· ·57.19 percent, that is correct.··And that's all I said,

22· ·your Honor.··I explained to you how we got to where we

23· ·are and that's where the rift comes in, because the

24· ·attorney's fee that -- that Al has pulled out with the

25· ·GBU -- or the attorneys fee that Ken and Candy and I

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 31 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·were supposed to be paying, that Al has been paying for

·2· ·those past years, so that's why the 57.19 percent went

·3· ·back to the original contract.

·4· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··You -- you are, in fact,

·5· ·contesting the way in those were quote/unquote pulled

·6· ·out?

·7· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, your Honor, the crux of the

·8· ·lawsuit --

·9· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··That's the whole case.

10· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, your Honor.··And we are soon

11· ·going to be filing a motion for summary judgment to get

12· ·them pulled back in, because there wasn't authority to

13· ·pull it out.··But that's another day.

14· · · · · · · · ·I have given you the order, your Honor, and

15· ·if you would --

16· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yeah, I'm going to deny it, but

17· ·I'm not ready -- I'm not ready yet to sanction

18· ·Mr. Hargrave with attorney's fees.

19· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Would you like -- I think you can

20· ·cross out number two.

21· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I just put a zero.

22· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.

23· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··All right.··So now, the next

24· ·matter is yours.

25· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··The next motion would be the

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 32 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·motion to compel?

·2· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes.

·3· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.··So, your Honor, I do

·4· ·have -- may I please approach, your Honor.

·5· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes.

·6· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··These are -- your Honor, I do not

·7· ·have a copy for Mr. Hargrave, and apparently he --

·8· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Of what?

·9· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Of those.··He's sitting by

10· ·Mr. Gibbs, so he can look upon Mr. Gibbs'.··I think the

11· ·easiest way to do this, your Honor, is to discuss --

12· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Just -- just let me hold you

13· ·just one second.

14· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes.

15· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··We're talking about the

16· ·plaintiffs' motion to compel discovery responses by

17· ·Howard Kirk Gibbs --

18· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes.

19· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- and motion for sanctions

20· ·filed on July 29, 2014, on behalf of Candace, Candy

21· ·Walton, and Kenneth, Ken Gibbs, as plaintiffs?

22· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, your Honor.

23· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Okay.··All right.··Proceed.

24· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.··Since this filing, he has

25· ·provided me with the documents that I've given you, that

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 33 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·is what he's provided me.

·2· · · · · · · · ·So I think the easiest thing to do would be

·3· ·to talk about the production of documents first and

·4· ·those are your first two documents.

·5· · · · · · · · ·The production of documents,

·6· ·Mr. Howard Kirk Gibbs, he did timely object to the

·7· ·production of documents that Candy asserted that -- I'm

·8· ·sorry, this is all the -- he did timely file to the

·9· ·production of documents and asking for productive order.

10· · · · · · · · ·And, your Honor, these three documents, I'm

11· ·not going go through every single thing, because if I

12· ·did, we would be here for days.··He objected to, not the

13· ·production of the documents, but to the interrogatories

14· ·and to almost every single admission.

15· · · · · · · · ·So I want to focus on number three, four,

16· ·and five of the requests for production of documents --

18· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··-- for Candy.··Number three is

19· ·where I requested -- I think three and four are

20· ·interrelated.··I asked for him to prevent -- to produce

21· ·statements of his bank accounts that he has held since

22· ·January 1, 2008.··That's the same year that GWB was

23· ·created and established.

24· · · · · · · · ·And number four are his tax returns for

25· ·2008, your Honor.··And he objects to them.··I'm -- I'm

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 34 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·not trying to speak for Mr. Gibbs, but Hoffman versus

·2· ·Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, I read the case, I have

·3· ·it.··I have no idea what he's talking about.

·4· · · · · · · · ·And then for the tax returns, he says that

·5· ·he's not entitled to those because he cites some cases,

·6· ·I have the cases, and that's not a correct cite.··For

·7· ·the tax returns, your Honor, you're entitled to them,

·8· ·the case is very clear, if they are germane to this case

·9· ·and they're pertinent and they're discoverable.

10· · · · · · · · ·And then, obviously, the bank statements,

11· ·as well, are very pertinent.··And I don't know if you

12· ·want me to tell you why or you would like to hear

13· ·Mr. Hargrave -- Mr. Gibbs' argument first.

14· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··No, go ahead and continue with

15· ·the bank statements.

16· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Your Honor, I would like to

17· ·hold my objections to the end.··Would that be all right?

18· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes.

19· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Okay.··Thank you.

20· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··So when Candy became the trustee,

21· ·and we still don't have the order yet, your Honor, I do

22· ·have a copy for you to sign, if you could, for us.

23· · · · · · · · ·When she became the trustee, Beverly

24· ·Miller, through her attorney, did provide us with some

25· ·of the documents, a lot of documents, but they're are

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 35 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·not all there.··We're missing a lot of information.

·2· · · · · · · · ·But nonetheless, he did produce quite a bit

·3· ·of documents and most substantially, what he produced is

·4· ·tax returns, 1099s, and bank statements.

·5· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Excuse me, your Honor, our

·6· ·turning over documents, how is that relevant to

·7· ·Mr. Gibbs' discovery?

·8· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Oh, I'm getting there.

·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··I appreciate it, but --

10· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I promise, I'm getting there.

11· · · · · · · · ·Well, because it's also relevant because we

12· ·haven't received all the documents.

13· · · · · · · · ·But in reviewing the documents, and I'm not

14· ·a CPA, I'm a tax attorney, I have an LLM, in a taxation

15· ·from the University of Florida, so reviewing these, I

16· ·look at them in a different light than most individuals

17· ·do.

18· · · · · · · · ·And the documents from Beverly Miller show

19· ·tax fraud, through the accounts and through 1099s, that

20· ·were perpetrated -- and I'm going to show it, that were

21· ·committed by Beverly Miller, at the request of

22· ·Al Barcroft and Howard Gibbs.··And I have here -- your

23· ·Honor, what happens when a trustee distributes money to

24· ·any party, that amount of money that she distributes,

25· ·because it's income, has to be on a person's 1099.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 36 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Right.

·2· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.··I have the 1099.··Well, I

·3· ·have proof that's not what happened.··May I please

·4· ·approach.

·6· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Here's just a few documents, but

·7· ·because I have -- I mostly focussed on '12 and '13.

·8· ·First document is from Howard Gibbs that states, Beverly

·9· ·if any time I want to split my money to another member

10· ·of the trust, I hereby authorize that transfer.

11· · · · · · · · ·You go to the next page.··In August

12· ·of 2013, it states, Howard Gibbs requested this money be

13· ·deducted from his August split, which is $2,000, and

14· ·sent to Pentex for Al Barney.··Which, your Honor, you're

15· ·going to find out later that Al Barney is the alias for

16· ·Al Barcroft.

17· · · · · · · · ·Then you go to the next page, it also shows

18· ·that Howard kirk is giving to $3,120 to Pentex and they

19· ·just keep going on.··I don't want to go through all of

20· ·them.··So that happened in 2013.

21· · · · · · · · ·May I approach, your Honor?

22· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes, ma'am.

23· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Here are the 1099s for 2013.

24· ·Ken, Candy and Howard Kirk had the exact same interest.

25· ·The very first document is Howard Kirk.··If you look at

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 37 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·number five, you can look at number four and number

·2· ·five, 86,971; if you look at Candy's, 86,971, you look

·3· ·at Ken's 86,971, you look at Pentex 86,809.··These tax

·4· ·returns were not done correctly.··That is tax fraud.

·5· · · · · · · · ·What Howard Kirk did was he using this as

·6· ·his own bank account.··The money that was going to

·7· ·Howard Kirk had to be paid to Howard Kirk, that is tax

·8· ·law.··But he has, in just the few documents I sent you,

·9· ·where he's telling her, give money to Al -- there's even

10· ·one in here from Al that says, hold out 321 -- $3,120

11· ·out --

12· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Your Honor, if I might

13· ·object.··I thought we're here trying to get some

14· ·documents.··If she would like for him to turn over some

15· ·documents or would she like to try the case?

16· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··No, your Honor, what I'm trying

17· ·to show is the reason why I need his tax returns and

18· ·bank accounts, I mean, unless you would like to just

19· ·say, yes, I can have them --

20· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, yes, of course you can --

21· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I can have them then --

22· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- we're in litigation.

23· ·Obviously, I will listen to your objection --

24· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.··I don't need to say any

25· ·more anymore.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 38 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- when you get into

·2· ·litigation, that's the risk.

·3· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Well, then, I'm done.

·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··May I make a statement?

·5· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes, sir.

·6· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Okay.··Ms. Lee has put before

·7· ·the Court today that there's a tax sham and I'm involved

·8· ·in it.··And the last 24 hours, this has completely

·9· ·changed the case because she has leveled a charge of

10· ·federal tax fraud against me, claiming to have all the

11· ·evidence and proclaiming that she is going to turn it

12· ·all over to the authorities.

13· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I have not stated that.

14· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Your Honor, I would like put

15· ·something in evidence in just a minute about that.

16· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··That's --

17· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··All this is not correct, but

18· ·she says she has evidence.··Until she produces that

19· ·evidence and I see what it affects, it would not be

20· ·prudent or proper of me to turn over anything in a civil

21· ·court or for the Court to require me to do so.

22· · · · · · · · ·This morning I consulted with an attorney

23· ·and he stated any evidence obtained by this Court could

24· ·be used in a federal tax fraud case against me;

25· ·therefore, I cannot provide any more discovery, because

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 39 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·it may be used against me in a criminal matter Ms. Lee

·2· ·threatened me with yesterday.

·3· · · · · · · · ·Therefore, I ask the Court for a

·4· ·continuance, pending me locating a criminal defense

·5· ·attorney.

·6· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Your Honor, I'm not -- first of

·7· ·all, I'd like to know, what attorney did you talk to?

·8· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Just a moment -- just a minute.

·9· ·Yes, sir?

10· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Your Honor, may I put something

11· ·in as evidence to the threat that was posed against me,

12· ·please.

13· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Your Honor, it's a settlement

14· ·offer.··There's no threat --

15· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··If it's a settlement offer --

16· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··It's for settlement purposes

17· ·only --

18· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I can't take that into

19· ·evidence -- I can't take that into evidence.··I don't

20· ·want to know about it.

21· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Okay.··May I read the

22· ·information --

23· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··No.

24· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··No, no, no --

25· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··And, your Honor, as an officer --

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 40 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- it's not admissible and we

·2· ·don't want to taint the Court with whatever may or may

·3· ·not have happened in an attempted -- or settlement

·4· ·offers.

·5· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··And, your Honor, I would like to

·6· ·reiterate --

·7· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I think the next thing would

·8· ·be, sir, I'm going to go ahead and order this because

·9· ·it's -- it's part of litigation.··I wouldn't like

10· ·to -- to divulge my personal records or taxes, either,

11· ·but when you get in litigation and clearly I think she's

12· ·shown enough that she should at least be able to see it.

13· · · · · · · · ·Now, I don't know if she's going to make

14· ·any of this -- you know, she's thrown a lot against the

15· ·wall and none of it may stick, but you're a party to

16· ·litigation, she certainly got a right to

17· ·see -- especially with the apparent rapport or apparent

18· ·direction between you and the former trustee, it all

19· ·looks like it, at least, might lead to some discoverable

20· ·evidence.

21· · · · · · · · ·So, I guess, the next thing to do would be

22· ·for you to hire your attorney and --

23· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Well, your Honor --

24· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- and when she files a motion

25· ·for contempt, if you fail to do this, the next step will

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 41 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·be motion for contempt.

·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Well, your Honor, do I not get

·3· ·to the relevance of the information she's trying to get?

·4· ·Does that -- does that not come into the Court, whether

·5· ·this information is relevant or not?

·6· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··You can do it for the record,

·7· ·sir, but it seems to me it's rather elementary.··It's

·8· ·relevant.

·9· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Your Honor, and I also would

10· ·request -- could I please approach the bench.

11· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Why do you think it's not

12· ·relevant?

13· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Well, your Honor, and I'm not a

14· ·lawyer --

15· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I know you're not, that's --

16· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··-- but I'm trying to explain to

17· ·you, the things that I have read, what I understood in

18· ·order for this kind of information to be turned over,

19· ·it's got to be relevant to the case.

20· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I believe it is.

21· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Okay.··It's relevant since

22· ·2008?

23· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··That's when the trust was

24· ·created, your Honor.

25· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··So --

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 42 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I --

·2· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··And, your Honor, he's had

·3· ·$600,000 of federal tax liens.··I --

·4· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I -- you know, sidebar remarks

·5· ·and -- we don't need the character assassination.··I

·6· ·don't know anything about this gentleman, here.··I just

·7· ·know he got in litigation, you showed me enough to see

·8· ·you should be able to see his bank accounts and tax

·9· ·records.

10· · · · · · · · ·And if he thinks that's not a good idea, he

11· ·needs to bring his attorney in here on or before the

12· ·time your next step would be to file a motion for

13· ·contempt, which --sanctions and contempt.··And just

14· ·because, you know, it's been a long, long time, I don't

15· ·have the paperwork to put somebody in jail, but I did it

16· ·four or five year ago, but probate courts can do that,

17· ·you know, for failure to comply with -- with discovery

18· ·requests and motions to compel.

19· · · · · · · · ·And that's just an FYI.··That's not a

20· ·threat, that just a for-your-information, because a lot

21· ·of people tend to think of these courts as somehow less

22· ·important.

23· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··May I please approach, your

24· ·Honor, I would also like to request the Court, this is a

25· ·form that I'm requesting the Court to ask -- in

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 43 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·conjunction with the tax returns, it's an IRS form 4506,

·2· ·it's just a copy for a tax return, it has my name, where

·3· ·they deliver it, these are the tax years,

·4· ·I -- obviously, my clients will pay the fees for the IRS

·5· ·to deliver the tax return.

·6· · · · · · · · ·Frankly, I'm not going believe if Mr. Gibbs

·7· ·produces a tax return that that was the one that was

·8· ·adequately -- or accurately filed with the IRS.··This is

·9· ·a normal return.··This type of form is what -- in

10· ·litigation, as well as if you want a mortgage on a

11· ·house, and they need to verify the tax return or you

12· ·want a loan, you want anything to do with the bank, this

13· ·is what the bank would file with the IRS to ensure the

14· ·tax return you provided to them was accurate.

15· · · · · · · · ·I'm requesting the Court have Mr. Gibbs and

16· ·his wife sign that and return that to my office.

17· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Mr. Gibbs, I do want to tell

18· ·you that probably, if you were represented by counsel,

19· ·that counsel would want some sort of agreement of

20· ·confidentiality --

21· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Absolutely.

22· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- he's entitled, and I

23· ·don't -- you know, to varying degrees of

24· ·confidentiality.··Some stuff that might be only for your

25· ·eyes and some that may or not be for your clients' eyes,

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 44 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·certainly none of it to be disseminated by anyone , but

·2· ·I'm not sure that --

·3· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I would agree to that, your

·4· ·Honor.··I would like -- if it's just for my eyes only,

·5· ·it doesn't help if -- I mean, I do need to discuss with

·6· ·my clients, maybe may be some of the contents, not the

·7· ·actual numbers.

·8· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I wasn't attempting to impose

·9· ·limited parameters.··I'm stating that if he were here

10· ·with an attorney, that that's probably something you-all

11· ·would work out, in writing some sort of confidentiality

12· ·agreement that meets whatever the exigencies or the

13· ·particular concerns are.

14· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Your Honor, as a person

15· ·who's entitled to receive these responses also, I would

16· ·like to make sure that I get a copy of whatever she

17· ·gets.

18· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Well, that would be up to

19· ·Howard Kirk.··I mean, I think he just said -- would you

20· ·like for this to be confidential?

21· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··I'm sorry, that wasn't what

22· ·I was discussing.··I was discussing the discovery

23· ·responses --

24· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··You're piggy-backing onto her

25· ·motion to compel?

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 45 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··No, I'm saying if she gets

·2· ·anything -- I know I'm entitled, under the rules, to get

·3· ·a copy of it.

·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··And, your Honor --

·5· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I think Howard Kirk should

·6· ·provide that to you.··I don't think I should have to

·7· ·incur the costs of copying documents and providing that

·8· ·to him, unless he would like to pay per copy fee.

·9· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, the Court's not going to

10· ·say you're not entitled to it, but the Court's not going

11· ·to determine how that's going to happen today.··Let's

12· ·find out --

13· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Okay.

14· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Your Honor, I think it would be

15· ·a lot easier if I had an attorney.··Would the Court

16· ·agree with that?

17· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··That's entirely your choice.

18· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··No, but --

19· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··What I'm telling you is I'm

20· ·going to go ahead and enter orders and that, most

21· ·likely, you need to go find an attorney who's going to

22· ·come here and keep you from being held in contempt in

23· ·the event you do not comply with the request.

24· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Well, your Honor, what I'm

25· ·saying is I would love to have an attorney as well.··But

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 46 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·being as is Ms. Lee has tied up the money for the last

·2· ·seven months that I would be getting from the estate, if

·3· ·I had the money that was in GWB transferred like it

·4· ·should have been, I know Candy is just apparently -- I

·5· ·didn't know the papers were signed and I didn't know

·6· ·Ms. Lee was going to give you the papers to turn over

·7· ·the trusteeship to Candy, but if that's the case,

·8· ·whenever the funds are disbursed, then I will get an

·9· ·attorney.··I've talked to an attorney, but I've got to

10· ·have the money.··They don't go for anything beside

11· ·money, so I wish you --

12· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··You have that for the record,

13· ·sir, but we're here on her motion today and so far I've

14· ·found it meritorious.

15· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I do have somewhat of an order,

16· ·if you want me to fill in -- like, for example, may I

17· ·please request that Howard Kirk fill out that

18· ·document --

19· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Correct.

20· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··-- and then when would that be

21· ·required for him to return that to me, I can write that

22· ·in my order?

23· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··What would be your preferred

24· ·time, reasonable -- reasonable time?

25· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Oh, for that?

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 47 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Uh-huh.

·2· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Seven days.

·3· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··No, better make that 14.

·4· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··14 days, so today is 16th --

·5· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··He'll get a chance to find a

·6· ·lawyer and talk to his lawyer.

·7· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.··So October 30th?

·8· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yeah.

·9· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··And then to produce -- and going

10· ·on with the documents, your Honor, the number five, are

11· ·phone records, your Honor.··I've -- I've requested phone

12· ·records --

13· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I would just like everything

14· ·else to be due within 30 days and we'll expect his

15· ·attorney will come forward and negotiate additional time

16· ·as needed.

17· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay, November 15th.··Okay.

18· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··If not, he needs to deliver

19· ·that to you.··This has been going on long enough.

20· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, thank you, your Honor.··And

21· ·the other production of documents, there's only two

22· ·other things I want to discuss concerning Ken, the

23· ·responsive documents for production of Kenneth Gibbs,

24· ·would be number 11 and 12.

25· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes, ma'am.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 48 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··11 is to produce all

·2· ·correspondence with Sharron Cox concerning GWB Trust,

·3· ·GBU Trust and this lawsuit.··This is not his attorney,

·4· ·your Honor.··This -- this somebody who -- this was not

·5· ·his attorney.··And I've requested anything, including

·6· ·letters, e-mails and tape recordings and I know he has a

·7· ·tape recording which Sharron Cox was involved, because

·8· ·she was at the hearing that he taped.

·9· · · · · · · · ·And his response is, I do not know of any

10· ·documents that meet that criteria.··I'm unclear as to

11· ·what that means.

12· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Sharron Cox is not his attorney

13· ·today, but was there a point in time when there an

14· ·attorney-client relationship there --

15· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··No, your Honor.

16· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··No, I think Sharron Cox

17· ·previously represented my client --

18· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Oh, the previous -- oh, yes --

19· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Ms. Miller.

20· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes, yes.

21· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··I believe that -- that those

22· ·communications are confidential, because they were

23· ·communications between co-defendants -- possibly

24· ·planning trial strategy and therefore would not be

25· ·discoverable.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 49 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··But your Honor, he's not an

·2· ·attorney.··He's a layperson.

·3· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··He was a layperson who was sent

·4· ·copies -- in other words, anything that was sent to him.

·5· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··And he does have a tape recording

·6· ·and I know he does, because he's quoted that tape

·7· ·recording for a hearing that she was present.

·8· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··But he was a pro se party, even

·9· ·though he was -- well, of course, that's not a

10· ·confidentiality.··That's an interesting issue.

11· · · · · · · · ·Now, tell me again what they allegedly are

12· ·and why he would have them.

13· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I'm asking for anything

14· ·concerning this lawsuit that he has had correspondence

15· ·with Sharron Cox and one of things is a tape

16· ·recording --

17· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··And she was never his attorney,

18· ·we know that.

19· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··That is correct, never his

20· ·attorney.··But concerning this specific lawsuit, I would

21· ·like to have the correspondence.··And his answer is, I

22· ·don't know of any documents that meet this criteria.

23· · · · · · · · ·And I don't understand what that means,

24· ·but -- instead of like, I don't have anything.··And

25· ·that's most of his answers for everything, I don't know

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 50 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·of any documents that meet this criteria.

·2· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I'm going to find that answer

·3· ·insufficient and order that he produce any written

·4· ·correspondence that he may have.

·5· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.

·6· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··As well as any alleged tape

·7· ·recording, you put that in your order -- I'm going to

·8· ·sign an order, correct?

·9· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, your Honor --

10· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··And you're going to put exactly

11· ·in the order what it is.

12· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, your Honor.··I have it right

13· ·here, it says --

14· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··I'm sorry.··For

15· ·clarification, propounded by either one of them to be

16· ·turned over or just stuff that he asked her -- how do

17· ·you want that, going both ways or how would you do that?

18· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes, there's no attorney-client

19· ·privilege between him.

20· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··And then number 12, produce all

21· ·correspondence with Al Barcroft concerning GWB Trust,

22· ·GBU Trust, Pentex Foundation, Pentex Royalty Trust as

23· ·they relate to this lawsuit, including letters, e-mails,

24· ·and tape recordings.

25· · · · · · · · ·And he says, I've misplaced or lost the

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 51 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·letter and after a thorough search, I cannot locate it.

·2· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, we'll order him again and

·3· ·if he comes back with the same answer, then, you know,

·4· ·we'll --

·6· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- see what happens.··If we

·7· ·find those later, then that could be a matter of

·8· ·perjury.

·9· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··So moving on to admissions.

10· ·Instead of going through each admission, if the Court

11· ·would just bear with me, just with some dates.

12· · · · · · · · ·On May 2nd -- so May 2nd, Howard Kirk Gibbs

13· ·filed his answer, a plea to the jurisdiction, and an

14· ·admission request to my client, Candy, and my client,

15· ·Candy, answered.

16· · · · · · · · ·On May 28th, so about 26 days later, Candy

17· ·served him with his -- with the discovery request.··And

18· ·on June 3rd, Ken served Howard Kirk with a discovery

19· ·request.

20· · · · · · · · ·Then on June 20th, two-and-a-half months

21· ·after this had started and he started discovery, he

22· ·filed a temporary protection order saying I don't --

23· ·please, your Honor, protect me because -- because

24· ·there's a jurisdiction issue and so discovery must be

25· ·suspended.··Well, the case doesn't state, that the case

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 52 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·says that the courts can -- can not allow discovery

·2· ·until a jurisdiction issue, but that doesn't come into

·3· ·play when Howard Kirk already started the discovery

·4· ·process.

·5· · · · · · · · ·He started the discovery process and did

·6· ·not answer, did not provide anything except for the

·7· ·production of documents he did appropriately object to

·8· ·those in a timely manner for Candy.··He doesn't even

·9· ·mention in his protective order, doesn't mention once,

10· ·anything that says, Hey, I don't want to answer the

11· ·interrogatories or the admissions.

12· · · · · · · · ·I sent him a letter, and it's Exhibit D on

13· ·my document, where I explain to him that he effectively

14· ·waived his right to request a suspension of production

15· ·of discovery because he already started it and now he's

16· ·not going to produce anything.

17· · · · · · · · ·Even after the hearing on July 31st, for

18· ·the jurisdiction issue, even after that was heard, I

19· ·still didn't hear from him.

20· · · · · · · · ··So I finally, on August 13th, six weeks

21· ·after it was due, he provides me with astonishing

22· ·admissions.··Now, I do know that he's pro se, but most

23· ·of the admissions are not -- are not even complete.

24· · · · · · · · ·So, your Honor, before I even start going

25· ·through the admissions, Howard Kirk is not someone who

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 53 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·is ignorant at all.··He is very savvy for a pro se, he

·2· ·files lots of documents.··And even though he gets a lot

·3· ·of the case law wrong, he finds some case law that

·4· ·maybe, possibly could be relevant.

·5· · · · · · · · ·This is also an individual who has filed

·6· ·documents with the court for himself in 2004, and he was

·7· ·found guilty of simulating legal processes --

·8· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Your Honor, you've already

·9· ·ruled we're not going to have character assassination.

10· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··It's not character assassination.

11· ·I'm trying to tell, your Honor, I want all the

12· ·admissions admitted.··He knew what he was doing.··He did

13· ·not file an appropriate document to this Court.··He does

14· ·not respect the judicial process.··He has shown that

15· ·time and time again.··He's been determined a vexatious

16· ·litigant.

17· · · · · · · · ·It's not to be a character attacking, at

18· ·all.··It's to show his behavior and that this Court

19· ·shouldn't allow him six extra weeks, and he doesn't

20· ·even -- the admissions are pretty much null and void and

21· ·I can go through just some of them to tell you how he

22· ·answered them.··Now, he has agreed to a deposition, so

23· ·at least I can maybe get some of those answers from him

24· ·then.

25· · · · · · · · ·But he knew very well, when he filed the

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 54 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·plea of abatement and plea of jurisdiction on May 2nd,

·2· ·it was his motion, then he filed admissions.··He started

·3· ·discovery that he received from my client.··And then he

·4· ·says, oh, I want to be protected.··Six weeks later, he

·5· ·sends it.

·6· · · · · · · · ·Anybody else, all those would be admitted

·7· ·and I want him to be treated like anybody else.··So I'm

·8· ·asking the Court, first, if he would please admit all

·9· ·his admissions; if not, then we need to go through some

10· ·of them.

11· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Your response to this

12· ·protective order, sir, do you have one?

13· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··The protective order?··Your

14· ·Honor, I did what I thought was the best thing to do.

15· ·I've not done this before, so this is kind of new ground

16· ·for me and due to money tied up where I can't hire an

17· ·attorney, I'm kind of in a bad position here.

18· · · · · · · · ·So I'm doing the best I can do and I don't

19· ·know all the legal ramifications on how to read case law

20· ·and how to determine all these things, but I'm doing the

21· ·best I can do, your Honor, and that's all --

22· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, you did begin discovery

23· ·and I'm going to agree with her, discovery will not be

24· ·postponed.

25· · · · · · · · ·This has something that Ms. Cox has filed

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 55 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·that they found in the clerk's office, but it doesn't

·2· ·look like it -- it's a motion for continuance from

·3· ·Sharron Cox that doesn't look like it has anything to do

·4· ·with today's hearing.

·5· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··No, your Honor.

·6· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··This has to do with

·7· ·disgorgement --

·8· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Disgorgement.

·9· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I would like to say --

10· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I'm not sure that I'm prepared

11· ·or that it's proper for me to, across the board, deem

12· ·all of his admissions admitted.··I do agree if he hasn't

13· ·properly responded, that you may entitled to have it

14· ·deemed admitted.

15· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Your Honor, I would like to

16· ·reiterate that in his response to my motion to compel,

17· ·he states that the reason he filed the protective order

18· ·is he did not believe he should be a party to this case.

19· · · · · · · · ·Again, I have here, he has substantial

20· ·legal history of filing legal documents with the Court.

21· ·And I think he should be -- if he was anybody else, your

22· ·Honor, it would have been admitted.··One date day late,

23· ·gone to an attorney, it would have been admitted.

24· · · · · · · · ·And I informed him it was going to be

25· ·admitted.··And I was going to ask the Court of this, in

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 56 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·my letter to him, and he still waited six weeks, even

·2· ·after the hearing on July 31st, he still waited another

·3· ·two weeks to comply and this is way after I filed my

·4· ·motion to compel.

·5· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··I think the solution to this

·6· ·problem is -- is the deposition he's already set to

·7· ·have.··If he has not answered properly, then perhaps

·8· ·everyone of them deemed admitted just by operation of

·9· ·law --

10· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Your Honor, with all due

11· ·respect --

12· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··Excuse me.··He can try to

13· ·have undeemed at some point, but I think it's going to

14· ·be resolved.··Any question she has, she can ask at the

15· ·deposition.

16· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Your Honor, with all due respect,

17· ·I'm not sure that Mr. Hargrave is defending Howard Kirk,

18· ·who's representing himself.

19· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I don't think it's really -- I

20· ·appreciate your attempting to advise the Court, but I

21· ·don't think you can speak for Mr. Gibbs.

22· · · · · · · · ·No, actually, you know, I don't want the

23· ·fact that you waited and gave him more and more time to

24· ·work against you, but I do think the Court's going to

25· ·have to decide -- and I would think she would want to go

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 57 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·into your deposition with these things admitted -- the

·2· ·one's that are admitted are already admitted.

·3· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEE:··Your Honor, can I just go

·4· ·through, briefly, the way he answers his admissions,

·5· ·briefly?··I've got just a few.

·6· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··All right.··I'm looking at it.

·7· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.··For the one for

·8· ·Candy Walton, for example, 21, admit or deny you drove

·9· ·out of state of Texas in August 2004 to collect a check

10· ·for over $500,000 drawn from an account owned by KCH

11· ·Investment.··And he answers, it's beyond my scope of

12· ·knowledge or memory.··He doesn't remember a $500,000

13· ·check that he got?

14· · · · · · · · ·If you -- and those go on.··Like number 43,

15· ·admit or deny -- no, I'll go to 52, admit or deny that

16· ·you established KCH Investments.··And he says, I'm

17· ·unclear as to the meaning of established.

18· · · · · · · · ·Okay.··So he doesn't answer that one.

19· ·These are just few.··Number 66, admit or deny you and

20· ·your wife, Laura, file tax returns each year.

21· ·Objection, privilege and meant for harassment.

22· · · · · · · · ·And doesn't even say, but otherwise admit

23· ·or deny.··He doesn't answer that one.··And they go on

24· ·and on and on.

25· · · · · · · · ·With that being said, your Honor, I've been

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 58 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·informed by other counsel that on occasion,

·2· ·Judge Morrisett has been requested and has served as

·3· ·a maybe -- I don't want to say mediator, but has

·4· ·attended depositions.··And I can foresee a deposition

·5· ·going like this, no, I'm not going to give you that; no

·6· ·that's privileged; no, I don't know; no, I don't

·7· ·remember.

·8· · · · · · · · ·And I was wondering -- and that's why I

·9· ·didn't even bring the interrogatories, because he didn't

10· ·answer those either -- if the Court is not going to

11· ·admit the admissions, instead of going through each one,

12· ·asking him to please admit them or going through a

13· ·failed deposition, and there are so many parties that

14· ·it -- these depositions are not going to be heard until

15· ·the -- until the very end, like two days before our

16· ·discovery is finished, so in December -- the last day to

17· ·do depositions is December 12th and it looks like 9th

18· ·and 10th is going to be days of discovery -- I mean, the

19· ·depositions.

20· · · · · · · · ·So what am I going to do when I got to a

21· ·deposition and all he says is, I don't know or that's

22· ·harassment, I'm not going to answer it?

23· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, I guess you could have

24· ·the deposition down here and I could be in my office and

25· ·come out each time and order him to answer or not, I

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 59 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·suppose.

·2· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··That would be great.··If we could

·3· ·do something like that.

·4· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··But that's happened before, I'm

·5· ·just -- but I'm just -- but I don't understand, I'm not

·6· ·prepared today to just, I mean, automatically deem all

·7· ·those admitted.

·8· · · · · · · · ·Now, if you want me -- I do agree with you

·9· ·on the one you've brought to my attention, it's past the

10· ·deadline, I don't think that number 21 is a proper

11· ·answer.··But I'm not going to -- I mean, you're either

12· ·going to have to -- we have to --

13· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··If you -- your Honor, I mean, I

14· ·could go through this whole entire document, if you

15· ·agree that we could have it in the courtroom -- if it's

16· ·possible -- not courtroom, but we could have it here and

17· ·if we hit issues, we could ask you or Judge Morrisett to

18· ·assist us --

19· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··We do it all the time.··We

20· ·don't do it every day, but I mean it's not something

21· ·that's unheard of.

22· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.··Then I would be willing to

23· ·post --

24· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··But when you do the regular

25· ·notice for deposition, just make sure it's a day you can

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 60 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·use the courtroom.

·2· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.

·3· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··You can have the deposition

·4· ·wherever you want to --

·5· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I know , your Honor --

·6· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··We often have them down here

·7· ·for neutral -- I would rather deal with it in person

·8· ·than on the telephone, you know, and then, otherwise you

·9· ·have to postpone and have the hearing later, whether or

10· ·not the Court's going to order it answered.··And it

11· ·just -- I think makes for much cleaner procedure if you

12· ·do it here.

13· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.··Your Honor, may I please

14· ·approach, I've taken those admission off, we'll just --

15· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I'm not prepared to do the

16· ·admissions today.

17· · · · · · · · ·But sir, you know, you get these deemed

18· ·admitted against you, Mr. Hargrave's right, it's awfully

19· ·hard to get something undeemed, especially when you've

20· ·chosen to enter into litigation pro se.··And I'm sorry I

21· ·can't help you with -- there's no court appointed

22· ·attorneys in civil litigation, at least not

23· ·for -- unless someone's incapacitated.

24· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··And at the very end, we also,

25· ·again, because we do feel his actions were purposeful to

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 61 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·delay, because that's all they've been trying to do, and

·2· ·we're asking for our attorney fees to be paid to come

·3· ·here, draft these documents, come here in front of this

·4· ·court in order to compel these documents which we're

·5· ·entitled to.

·6· · · · · · · · ·And I can assure you, I only went through

·7· ·two -- I only went through very few documents.··He did

·8· ·provide me some documents, but I could have gone through

·9· ·every single one and these are the ones that are most

10· ·pertinent, just for brevity's sake.

11· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Well, your Honor, I was going

12· ·to bring up another point.··The thing with the federal

13· ·tax lien, the threat that was given to me by e-mail

14· ·yesterday, I'm concerned that anything that I bring

15· ·forth here is going to put me in liability and I want to

16· ·ask the Court if you're going to give me full immunity

17· ·for any information I give over in discovery that

18· ·might be used in a criminal case --

19· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I'm not prepared to grant you

20· ·immunity.··I wouldn't have the authority to do that.

21· ·I'm a county probate judge.

22· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Okay.··If -- you've got that,

23· ·your Honor, then I don't guess I've got any choice but

24· ·I've got to say I need to plead the 5th Amendment, so I

25· ·don't incriminate myself by giving information on a --

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 62 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·if there's a particular thing that's asked, I'm not

·2· ·going to do a blanket fifth, but if there's a particular

·3· ·thing that's asked that I think is going to incriminate

·4· ·myself, I have to choice on that particular question, to

·5· ·take the 5th Amendment.

·6· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Thank you.··That's so noted for

·7· ·the record.··And how much are you seeking in attorney's

·8· ·fees for purposes of this motion to compel?

·9· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··$2,800, your Honor.

10· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··How did you arrive at that

11· ·figure?

12· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I actually did the calculations

13· ·through my own invoices.··And it was little bit more,

14· ·but I didn't compensate for today's hearing or for

15· ·travel time to get to today's hearing.

16· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Would you like to cross-examine

17· ·her on the amount of attorney fees she's seeking for

18· ·this hearing, sir?

19· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I can produce the invoice, your

20· ·Honor, I can redact the invoices and produce it to him.

21· · · · · · · · ·MR. GIBBS:··Your Honor, I'm not prepared to

22· ·do that.··I -- if she's going to give you the invoices,

23· ·your Honor, that would be fine.

24· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··It will show more than $2,800,

25· ·your Honor, but I will tell you, your Honor, I will

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 63 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·redact some of the information because it is

·2· ·client-attorney privilege.··Are we okay --

·3· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I'm granting the motion to

·4· ·compel and I'm ordering $2,800 in sanctions.

·5· · · · · · · · ·And, sir, all I can tell you is that

·6· ·ultimately you can be stripped of your pleadings and

·7· ·there can be default judgment entered against you in

·8· ·litigation when you either do not meet deadlines or do

·9· ·not answer discovery, again, that's -- that's your

10· ·choice at to what happens in this case, but I strongly

11· ·suggest that you go find counsel, because I presume this

12· ·is not our last courtroom session.

13· · · · · · · · ·Ms. Lee's next step, if she doesn't get

14· ·this or doesn't get all of it, I'm sure will be a motion

15· ·for contempt.

16· · · · · · · · ·This hearing is in recess.··Bailiff, I want

17· ·to make sure you give them all copies of the orders

18· ·which have been signed.··There is one and here is two

19· ·and --

20· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Your Honor --

21· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- I believe that's it.

22· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I think we were going to -- were

23· ·we going to address Al Barcroft's, he filed a --

24· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Special appearance?

25· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, your Honor.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 64 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Isn't that his motion to

·2· ·address?

·3· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Well, and he's not here, but,

·4· ·your Honor, I would like to talk to Court for five

·5· ·minutes, max, on the rule of costs on his -- he filed

·6· ·a --

·7· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··We're back on the record.··And

·8· ·there is -- I did see we had one, but isn't it his

·9· ·special appearance, is that not something for him to

10· ·argue --

11· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, your Honor --

12· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- were he to appear?

13· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··But he's not appearing.

14· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I know that, but were he to

15· ·come, that would be his argument, not yours.

16· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I know, your Honor, but I want to

17· ·argue the 143 rule for cost, asking the Court, on its

18· ·own motion, to assess costs.··Mr. Barcroft has provided

19· ·me a 150-page answer, he provided it to me, I believe,

20· ·and the other opposing parties -- or the other parties

21· ·yesterday, stating that, I guess, he does have

22· ·jurisdiction and even argues that having a social life

23· ·and personal life in Texas doesn't give this Court

24· ·jurisdiction, but he's going to go ahead and answer.

25· · · · · · · · ·Mr. Barcroft, 55 pages is written word.··I

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 65 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·mean, he wrote 55 pages, counterclaims, affirmative

·2· ·defenses, and change of venue, motion to transfer venue.

·3· ·But most importantly, your Honor, he is -- as you can

·4· ·see from this Court, we have had a plea of abatement

·5· ·filed by Howard Kirk and it was denied; we've had a

·6· ·motion to abate by Beverly Miller, it was denied; we've

·7· ·had Howard Kirk file a motion to disqualify me as the

·8· ·attorney saying there's conflict of interest.··We've had

·9· ·the case being transferred over here from Tarrant

10· ·County , but they're doing everything they can to stop

11· ·that.

12· · · · · · · · ·And then as of yesterday, Al Barcroft

13· ·stated that he's going to add me as a third party

14· ·defendant, as all of this is my fault.··If he files

15· ·that, your Honor, there is -- I can't represent

16· ·individuals.··They have tried everything they can to

17· ·abate this case.

18· · · · · · · · ·So Rule 143 states that a party seeking

19· ·affirmative relief -- and he informed me through

20· ·multiple e-mails, that he kept sending me, that he wants

21· ·$3.1 million from me, that this Court can rule security

22· ·for costs at any time, for the cost of -- for costs that

23· ·could be incurred for hearings.··And this Court can rule

24· ·on it on its own motion.

25· · · · · · · · ··And, your Honor, I have, just by Googling

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 66 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·Al Barcroft and not doing any major research, I have

·2· ·these cases, Barcroft versus Commissioner of IRS, 1999,

·3· ·and it states, quote/unquote, his arguments are

·4· ·meritless, comma, indeed, comma, they are frivolous.

·5· · · · · · · · · ·Then I have In re: A purported judgment

·6· ·lien against Al Barcroft, 2001, same thing.··Al Barcroft

·7· ·versus Paul O'Neill, 2002, same thing, Al Barcroft

·8· ·versus County of Fannin and State, 2003.··And that was

·9· ·concerning that he was a republic form of government and

10· ·he's one of the sovereign American people and that was

11· ·dismissed.··U.S. versus Barcroft, same thing, 2008, he's

12· ·a sovereign immunity.

13· · · · · · · · ·I have 55 written pages, out of this, and

14· ·going to sue me, third party, as he states all this is

15· ·myself.··Not quite sure how I can be a third-party

16· ·defendant, but I would like the Court to consider, and

17· ·I've really briefly drafted an order for rule of costs,

18· ·because I can assure you, you think this is bad, the

19· ·pleadings are just going to be outrageous, that are

20· ·going to come down.··He's already sent me a not saying I

21· ·want to depose you --

22· · · · · · · · ·MR. HARGRAVE:··This doesn't involve you.

23· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I was going to say, it isn't on

24· ·the docket.

25· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Well, because this just happened

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 67 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·yesterday.··This just happened and he filed an answer.

·2· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yeah, and his motion --

·3· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··No, the answer, your Honor --

·4· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··The special appearance was on

·5· ·the docket for today.

·6· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, your Honor.

·7· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··He did not appear to argue it.

·8· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Correct.··So in my special

·9· ·appearance, your Honor, everything -- I have proved that

10· ·everything he has said in his special appearance is not

11· ·true.··Like, for example, he was here in your Court

12· ·January 7th.··He states in here, I haven't been to Texas

13· ·in six years.··But in here -- I'm telling you and I have

14· ·proof, he was here January 7th, in your courtroom,

15· ·sitting back there, because he wanted an accounting

16· ·concerning the estate of Bert Gibbs.

17· · · · · · · · ·And in his answer here, he talks about the

18· ·jurisdiction.··And he does state that, yes, he admits

19· ·he's been in Texas, but having a social and personal

20· ·life in Texas doesn't give the court jurisdiction over

21· ·me.

22· · · · · · · · ·This is a guy who has -- and I've got

23· ·copies for, your Honor, continued issues with the

24· ·government, he files frivolous lawsuits, and I would

25· ·like the Court to consider a rule for costs

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 Page 68 MOTION HEARING - March 03, 2015

·1· ·because -- and we want a cash money deposited into the

·2· ·county clerk, because if it's a bond, we'll never see

·3· ·that money.··I mean, he's Guatemala.

·4· · · · · · · · ·And he's served counterclaims and now if

·5· ·there is going to be a third-party defendant against me,

·6· ·then after all of these pleadings out there and

·7· ·everybody has fought to abate this case, it's going to

·8· ·potentially be abated until there can be a summary

·9· ·judgment ruled by this Court.

10· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Ms. Lee, I think you're getting

11· ·ahead of yourself.··I know what motions for costs are

12· ·and, you know, I don't think that I'm going to do that

13· ·sua sponte.··I think you have a right to file motion for

14· ·security of costs, but I'm not prepared to do that

15· ·today.

16· · · · · · · · ·You know, there is a -- this Court has the

17· ·ability to have somebody -- there's a whole process for

18· ·deeming somebody a vexatious litigant.··The other

19· ·court's done that, I haven't done that yet.··I guess I

20· ·could learn, if I have to.

21· · · · · · · · ·That's all we're going to do for today.

22· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Thank you.

23· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··If you want to take that cost

24· ·matter up, you need to get that before the Court at

25· ·another time.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 fc77682c-669a-4a00-ac18-7e042ed0c778 70

1 THE STATE OF TEXAS)

2 COUNTY OF TARRANT)

3 I, Ashlee Wells, Official Court Reporter in and for

4 the Probate Court No. 2 of Tarrant County, State of

5 Texas, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing

6 contains a true and correct transcription of all

7 portions of evidence and other proceedings requested in

8 writing by counsel for the parties to be included in

9 this volume of the Reporter's Record, in the

10 above-styled and -numbered cause, all of which occurred

11 in open court or in chambers and were reported by me.

12 I further certify that this Reporter's Record of

13 the proceedings truly and correctly reflects the

14 exhibits, if any, admitted by the respective parties.

15 I further certify that the total cost for the

16 preparation of this Reporter's Record is $ and

17 was paid/will be paid by Mr. Daniel Barrett .

18 WITNESS MY OFFICIAL HAND this the 11th day of

19 March, 2015.

21 ASHLEE WELLS, Texas CSR 8684 Expiration Date: 12/31/15 22 Official Court Reporter, Probate Court No. 2 23 Tarrant County, Texas

25 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

· · · · · · · · · · ··REPORTER'S RECORD · · · · · · · · · ··VOLUME 1 OF 1 VOLUMES · · · · · ··TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. 2005-0000126-2-D · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ··) · · ·IN RE: ESTATE OF BERT· · ··) IN THE PROBATE COURT · · ·HUGHES GIBBS, DECEASED;· ··) · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ··) · · ·CANDACE WALTON AND· · · · ·) · · ·KENNETH GIBBS,· · · · · · ·) · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ··) · · · · · · ·Plaintiffs,· · · ··) · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ··) · · ·VS.· · · · · · · · · · · ··) COURT NO. 2 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ··) · · ·BEVERLY MILLER,· · · · · ··) · · ·INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS· · · ·) · · ·TRUSTEE OF THE GWB· · · · ·) · · ·FRIENDS AND FAMILY TRUST,··) · · ·ALBERT BARCROFT,· · · · · ·) · · ·INDIVIDUALLY AND AS LEGAL··) · · ·REPRESENTATIVE OF PENTEX· ·) · · ·ROYALTY TRUST AND PENTEX· ·) · · ·FOUNDATION, DANNY UNGER,· ·) · · ·AS TRUSTEE OF GBU FRIENDS··) · · ·AND ASSOCIATES TRUST, AND··) · · ·HOWARD KIRK GIBBS,· · · · ·) · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ··) · · · · · · ·Defendants.· · · ··) TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ··***** · · · · · · · · · · ·***MOTION HEARING*** · · · · · · · · · · · · · ··***** · · · · · ··On the 27th day of February, 2015, the following · · · ·proceedings came on to be heard in the above-entitled · · · ·and numbered cause before the Honorable Patrick · · · ·Ferchill, Judge presiding, held in Fort Worth, Tarrant · · · ·County, Texas; · · · · · · · · · ··Proceedings reported by machine shorthand.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 Page 2 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · · · ·A P P E A R A N C E S · ·· ·2· · · ·· ·3· ··Ms. Christy Lee· · · · · · ··Mr. James Ravsten · ···Attorney at Law· · · · · · ··BAKUTIS & MCCULLY ·4· ··SBOT NO. 24052302· · · · · ··SBOT NO. 24046683 · ···225 East Fireweed Lane· · · ·500 West 7th Street ·5· ··Suite 200· · · · · · · · · ··Suite 725 · ···Anchorage, Alaska 99503· · ··Fort Worth, Texas 76102 ·6· ··Phone:··(907) 339-9931· · · ·Phone:··(817) 335-2208 · ···ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS· · ··ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT ·7· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·ALBERT BARCROFT · ·· ·8· · · ·· ·9· · · ···Mr. Daniel Barrett 10· ··TAYLOR, OLSON, ADKINS, · ···SRALLA, ELAM 11· ··SBOT NO. 01810400 · ···6000 Western Center Place 12· ··Suite 200 · ···I-30 at Bryant Irvin Raod 13· ··Fort Worth, Texas 76107 · ···Phone:··(817) 332-2580 14· ··ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT · ···HOWARD KIRK GIBBS 15· · · ·· 16· · · ·· 17· · · ·· 18· · · ·· 19· · · ·· 20· · · ·· 21· · · ·· 22· · · ·· 23· · · ·· 24· · · ·· 25· ·

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 3 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·I N D E X · ·· · · · · · · · · · · · ·VOLUME 1 ·2· · · · · · · · · · · ·(MOTION HEARING) · ·· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·Page· ·Vol. ·3· · · ···FEBRUARY 27, 2015 ·4· · · ···Announcements. . . . . . . . . . . . . .· · ·4· · ··1 ·5· · · ·· ·6· ··Opening statement by Mr. Barrett . . . .· · ·6· · ··1 · ···Response by Ms. Lee. . . . . . . . . . .· · ·17· · ·1 ·7· · · ·· ·8· · · ···Court's Ruling on Motion to Reconsider. .· ··25· · ·1 ·9· · · ···Court's Ruling on Motion to Quash and 10· ··Motion for Protective Order . . . . . . .· ··67· · ·1 · ·· 11· ··Adjournment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .· ··72· · ·1 · ·· 12· ··Court Reporter's Certificate. . . . . . .· ··73· · ·1 · ·· 13· · · ·· 14· · · ·· 15· · · ·· 16· · · ·· 17· · · ·· 18· · · ·· 19· · · ·· 20· · · ·· 21· · · ·· 22· · · ·· 23· · · ·· 24· · · ·· 25· ·

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 4 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·2· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Good morning and please be

·3· ·seated.··Let's get everybody on the record first,

·4· ·beginning with you, ma'am.

·5· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, your Honor.··Christy Lee for

·6· ·Candace Walton and Kenneth Gibbs, plaintiffs.

·7· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Dan Barrett for Howard Gibbs,

·8· ·one of the defendants.

·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. RAVSTEN:··James Ravsten, I'm here for

10· ·Michael Wiist, who represents Mr. Al Barcroft.

11· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Does the -- I see we have a

12· ·number of things here.··What is -- does anybody wish to

13· ·suggest what we might take up first?

14· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, your Honor.··We -- that

15· ·motion to distribute assets, may I please approach?

16· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes.

17· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··We have agreed, surprisingly, but

18· ·we have agreed --

19· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, when it comes to money.

20· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··The order, if you see the back of

21· ·the order, your Honor, the three parties, we have agreed

22· ·and everybody else has been notified of the motion, as

23· ·well as the hearing, they're not here to oppose it and

24· ·this is to distribute the assets, so we ask the Court to

25· ·please enter a ruling.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 5 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··No problem.

·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··That's right.

·3· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··And, your Honor, just to let you

·4· ·know, I think that will alleviate any other motions to

·5· ·distribute for a while.

·6· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Yeah, that's --

·7· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··This is -- are we distributing

·8· ·seven figures, so to speak?

·9· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··No, your Honor, it's just to

10· ·continue the administration of -- I'll keep this -- it's

11· ·just to continue the administration of the trust, as

12· ·well as some -- Scott Smith, according to the oil and

13· ·gas companies, had called and caused some issues with

14· ·the oil and gas royalties to GWB Trust, so some of the

15· ·oil and gas companies had suspended the royalties, but

16· ·they have released them and this order is just to

17· ·protect them.··We all agree GWB Trust assets aren't in

18· ·dispute.

19· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Fine. So what are we going to

20· ·dispute today?

21· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Judge, I think we have the

22· ·motion to reconsider and the motion to quash and for

23· ·protective order.

24· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Want to take the motion to

25· ·reconsider first?

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 6 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Yes, your Honor, if we might.

·2· ·And I'm going apologize to the Court in advance, I'm a

·3· ·bit under the weather and --

·4· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, you may be seated.··You

·5· ·may do this however you're more comfortable, standing,

·6· ·seated, or some of both, sir.

·7· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··I'm afraid if I sit, I may

·8· ·not get back up, Judge.

·9· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, if you decide you need to

10· ·take a break, just speak up, please.

11· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··I think, your Honor, the

12· ·easiest way and quickest way to approach this -- well,

13· ·first of all, I would ask the Court that the Court take

14· ·judicial notice of the contents of its file in this

15· ·case, so that we can discuss those documents without --

16· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Thank you.··There being no

17· ·objection, the Court will do so.

18· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··And I have documents --

19· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Thanks.

20· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··The first document in the

21· ·packet that I've just handed the Court, your Honor, is a

22· ·copy of selected pages from the plaintiffs' original

23· ·petition that was filed in this case.··It is selected

24· ·pages, because it includes only the face sheet of the

25· ·document and then pages 22 through the end of the

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 7 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·document, 25, which encompass the plaintiffs' prayer for

·2· ·relief and the relief being sought in the action.

·3· · · · · · · · ·The reason for highlighting this document

·4· ·is to illustrate to the Court that in that document, the

·5· ·only relief requested with respect to monetary damages

·6· ·is set out under paragraph Roman Numeral VII on page 24

·7· ·in paragraph number 73.··And as you can see, what is

·8· ·requested in that paragraph is damages, simply, quote,

·9· ·the loss of at least $250,000.

10· · · · · · · · ·The next document in the packet is simply a

11· ·copy of Texas Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 47, which

12· ·was amended in 2013.··Rule 47, obviously, has been

13· ·around a long time -- sorry -- but Rule 47 as amended

14· ·and as applicable to the matter at hand, is a mandatory

15· ·self-effectuating rule, your Honor.··It is mandatorily

16· ·phrased and says that the pleading of the plaintiff

17· ·shall contain various things.

18· · · · · · · · ·And in subparagraph (c), says that except

19· ·in suits governed by the Family Code, the pleading shall

20· ·contain a statement that the party seeks, and then there

21· ·are various options there setting out a range of damages

22· ·that have to be specified by the plaintiff.

23· · · · · · · · ·If you go to the second page, subsection

24· ·(d), the -- the self-effectuating part of this says that

25· ·a party -- excuse me -- a party that fails to comply

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 8 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·with subsection (c) may not conduct discovery until the

·2· ·party's pleading is amended to comply.

·3· · · · · · · · ·And now, I say that it's

·4· ·"self-effectuating," Judge, in that it does not require,

·5· ·as some other portions of Rule 47 do, as you know,

·6· ·require the defendant to bring forward a special

·7· ·exception in order to -- in order to invoke the

·8· ·provisions.

·9· · · · · · · · ·This portion of the rule does not require

10· ·any special exception and it simply says that the

11· ·party -- the plaintiff requesting relief, if they do not

12· ·have the statement that is required by subsection (c),

13· ·then that party may not conduct discovery until the

14· ·party's pleading is amended to comply.

15· · · · · · · · ·The next document in the packet is simply a

16· ·copy of the order in this case.··What happened was that

17· ·the plaintiff did forward some discovery, Mr. Gibbs, who

18· ·was pro se at the time, as you know, filed some sort of

19· ·response, I think there was some objections to responses

20· ·and whatnot, and then the plaintiffs filed a motion to

21· ·compel additional responses.

22· · · · · · · · ·The Court held a hearing in October, on

23· ·October 16, 2014, during which time the plaintiffs' live

24· ·pleading was the original petition, which did not

25· ·contain the statement required by Rule 47.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 9 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·And the Court, in that hearing, entered the

·2· ·order that is included as the next -- as the next

·3· ·document in the packet.··And that order was signed on

·4· ·the 16th of October, 2014, before any amendment by -- by

·5· ·the plaintiff.

·6· · · · · · · · ·The next packet -- the next document of the

·7· ·packet is simply the face sheet and the certificate of

·8· ·service sheet of the amended pleading in this case.

·9· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Right.

10· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··It is this amended pleading

11· ·that was filed on December 22, some two months after the

12· ·order that we're here to talk about.··And that amended

13· ·pleading is the one that did comply with Rule 47 and

14· ·because it did comply with Rule 47, the plaintiff was

15· ·then free to conduct its discovery.

16· · · · · · · · ·Now, the next document in the packet is a

17· ·copy of the opinion from the Edinburg Court of Appeals,

18· ·Corpus Christi Court of Appeals in the Greater McAllen

19· ·Star Properties case, in which this very provision and

20· ·the operation of the provision of Rule 47 that we're

21· ·talking about was discussed and the parameters outlined.

22· · · · · · · · ·And this case, while it -- it also dealt

23· ·with a lot of other things, but what the case holds, and

24· ·I have highlighted the appropriate holdings back at the

25· ·end of the case.··What the case holds is that Rule 47

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 10 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·means exactly what it says that it means and that

·2· ·discovery cannot be conducted before the pleading is

·3· ·amended to comply with Rule 47.··It also holds that it's

·4· ·not necessary for the plaintiff the re-propound any

·5· ·discovery that was propounded during the time when

·6· ·Rule 47 prevents or prohibits discovery from being

·7· ·conducted.

·8· · · · · · · · ·And so by application of the law as

·9· ·explained in the Greater McAllen case, as applied to

10· ·this case, no discovery that was propounded by the

11· ·plaintiffs before December 22nd was proper, but they did

12· ·not have to re-propound -- and what happened on

13· ·December 22nd when counsel -- excuse me -- when Ms. Lee

14· ·filed the amended petition, was that from that point

15· ·forward, then the -- whatever parties had received

16· ·discovery earlier in the case, that's when their time

17· ·period began to run.

18· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Okay.

19· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··The effect of all this, your

20· ·Honor, is that the order of October 16th that we have

21· ·requested the Court to reconsider and set aside is an

22· ·order -- I'm sorry -- is an order that compels Mr. Gibbs

23· ·to answer discovery and imposes sanctions against

24· ·Mr. Gibbs for failure to answer discovery that the

25· ·plaintiffs were not authorized to promulgate or to

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 11 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·propound.

·2· · · · · · · · ·So what happened after the discovery was

·3· ·authorized on December 22nd is, now amended answers, or

·4· ·amended responses to the discovery have been -- excuse

·5· ·me -- have been sent and served upon plaintiffs'

·6· ·counsel.··They are not without controversy.··We have

·7· ·propounded objections --

·8· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··To everything.

·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Not quite everything, but

10· ·several objections, your Honor.

11· · · · · · · · ·And plaintiffs have now filed a motion to

12· ·bring those objections to the Court -- before the Court

13· ·for ruling at an appropriate time.··But what we're

14· ·asking is that the Court set aside the order that --

15· ·that essentially imposed sanctions and compelled

16· ·responses to discovery that the plaintiffs had no

17· ·authority to propound.

18· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··And it's your contention that

19· ·the Court's 30 day plenary power doesn't have anything

20· ·to do with this particular order?

21· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Absolutely not.

22· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··And how is that?

23· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Because the plenary power

24· ·concept of the court only applies, your Honor, when the

25· ·court acts to divest itself of jurisdiction of a pending

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 12 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·action.··The court, while the action is still pending

·2· ·in the court, can -- while the action is still pending

·3· ·in the court, can reconsider anything that it has done

·4· ·at any point in the past.

·5· · · · · · · · ·The discussion that we had here last week,

·6· ·there was some confusion about that --

·7· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··There is, to me, because of the

·8· ·probate -- of course, we're not under the Probate Code,

·9· ·with it's bill of review, we're under Civil Procedure.

10· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··This is Civil Procedures.

11· ·This is a case under the Rules of Civil Procedure.

12· · · · · · · · ·And with respect to the Texarkana court and

13· ·what happened up in Fannin County, when -- when the

14· ·Fannin County court ruled that the motion to transfer

15· ·venue, that Ms. Lee had filed, should be granted and

16· ·said it's granted --

18· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··-- what that did is it had

19· ·the effect of divesting that court over its jurisdiction

20· ·over that action and saying it should be transferred to

21· ·Tarrant County, which would then become the proper court

22· ·of venue and jurisdiction.

23· · · · · · · · ·Since the judge, in acting to divest itself

24· ·of jurisdiction, did not reconsider that within the 30

25· ·day plenary power --

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 13 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Right.··Okay.

·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··-- it had no power to do

·3· ·so --

·4· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I agree.··And so the court of

·5· ·appeals said so.

·6· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··And that's exactly what the

·7· ·court of appeals said.

·8· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Okay.

·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··And so -- but the point is

10· ·that whenever a court retains -- if that court had

11· ·retained its authority over that action and denied the

12· ·motion to transfer, it could be reconsidered at any time

13· ·up until a final judgement or other order divesting the

14· ·court of power over the case was signed.

15· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Okay.··Well, then let me ask

16· ·you this, of course, if you had Mr. Gibbs' lawyer,

17· ·perhaps, at that point in this saga, I'm sure you would

18· ·have brought up, if indeed, this is a legitimate

19· ·objection, you would have brought it up at the time and

20· ·the Court would have considered it timely.··It seems

21· ·that Mr. Gibbs gets two bites of the apple of his own --

22· ·of his own choosing.

23· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··But, your Honor, that sounds

24· ·similar to a waiver argument in saying that he perhaps

25· ·waived his objection under Rule 467.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 14 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··No, he chose to represent

·2· ·himself after the, you know, the appropriate admonitions

·3· ·and cautionary advice given to him by the Court.··And I

·4· ·told him he was subject to all Rules of Civil Procedure

·5· ·and all Rules of evidence and it was his -- it was his

·6· ·choice.

·7· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··I understand that, your

·8· ·Honor --

·9· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Okay.··So now we're going to go

10· ·back and revisit it, because he wasn't a lawyer and

11· ·didn't bring it up at the time?

12· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··No, your Honor, with all due

13· ·respect, we're going back to visit because the

14· ·plaintiffs did not comply with Rule 47 when they filed

15· ·their original petition.··And therefore, the

16· ·self-effectuating sanction, if you will, in Rule 47 says

17· ·that because they did not file the correct petition,

18· ·they cannot conduct discovery.··They have no authority

19· ·to do so.··It's --

20· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··And just for the record, and

21· ·take me through this, what is the defect you see in

22· ·the -- in regard to subsection (c)?

23· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Subsection (c) says --

24· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Because she says, at least

25· ·250,000, is that the --

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 15 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Yes, your Honor, subsection

·2· ·(c) says -- if I can find my copy.

·3· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Uh-huh.··I'm looking.

·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··That it shall contain --

·5· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Right.

·6· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··-- the petition shall

·7· ·contain --

·8· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Right.··Fair notice --

·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··-- that the claim is only

10· ·monetary relief of a hundred thousand or less or

11· ·monetary relief of 100,000 or less and nonmonetary

12· ·relief, or if over a hundred thousand, a range, a

13· ·hundred thousand to 200,000, 200,000 to one million, or

14· ·monetary relief over one million.

15· · · · · · · · ·Those ranges set by the Supreme Court when

16· ·it promulgated the Rules of Civil Procedure, mean

17· ·exactly what they say.··The petition has to say one of

18· ·those things.··Saying that it's a claim for at least

19· ·$250,000 does not meet the requirements of Rule 47.

20· · · · · · · · ·And the Greater McAllen --

21· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, so you're saying this

22· ·rises to quote/unquote statutory wording, I mean, we can

23· ·just put quotation marks around say subsection four and

24· ·that exact phrase has to be in the petition and that in

25· ·any way substituting or saying it a different -- a

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 16 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·different way, is some sort of defect?

·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Absolutely.··And the reason

·3· ·for that, your Honor, is --

·4· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··How can the loss of at least

·5· ·$250,000 not fit with in subsection four, monetary

·6· ·relief over 250,000, but not more than a million?

·7· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Because it might be more than

·8· ·a million.··At least $250,000 could be more than a

·9· ·million.··We don't know what that means.

10· · · · · · · · ·And whether it's -- whether the Supreme

11· ·Court was committing sophistry or whatever when it

12· ·promulgated Rule 47 -- the amendments to Rule 47, it's

13· ·up to us to comply with that.··I don't know what their

14· ·reason was, but their reasoning is clearly revealed by

15· ·the reading of the -- I keep wanting to say statute, but

16· ·of the rule.

17· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Of course, it does say, may not

18· ·conduct discovery, didn't say, shall not.··Does that not

19· ·give some wiggle room?

20· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··I think not, your Honor.

21· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Okay.

22· · · · · · · · ·Well, without taking away from your

23· ·argument and knowing that you'll have a chance to speak

24· ·again, may I hear from Ms. Lee?··I know she's going to

25· ·have the opposite opinion.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 17 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, your Honor.··And first let

·2· ·me --

·3· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··But take me through it from

·4· ·your point of view.

·5· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··The very first important thing I

·6· ·would like to point out to the Court, the sanctions that

·7· ·were handed down to Howard Kirk on that day was not

·8· ·because of all the shenanigans that he did, which he

·9· ·did, and I could go through a big, long list of not

10· ·complying with the discovery.

11· · · · · · · · ·It was because of his behavior.··He was

12· ·rude, he was in inappropriate. If you recall, he sat

13· ·here and asserted the Fifth Amendment right and started

14· ·reading -- and this is Fifth Amendment and I'm not going

15· ·to -- and when you told him he had to produce these

16· ·documents, he stated, I will not.··And you said, if you

17· ·don't, I'm going to file contempt charges against you.

18· · · · · · · · ·And he was incredibly inappropriate to this

19· ·Court.··That's why the sanctions were handed down.··Not

20· ·because he started -- let's just go back.··He started

21· ·discovery.··He was the very first person in this entire

22· ·lawsuit who served discovery upon my clients.··He did

23· ·that on May 2nd, which my clients complied, which my

24· ·clients gave him discovery, he filed a protective order

25· ·and said, you know, jurisdiction and venue need to be

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 18 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·heard first, even though he had started discovery and

·2· ·received our discovery.··We gave it to him.··He never

·3· ·objected, he didn't come in front of this Court.

·4· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··That's true.

·5· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Then we had the jurisdiction and

·6· ·venue hearing, and you invoked jurisdiction and venue.

·7· ·And did he answer?··No, he did not.

·8· · · · · · · · ·So we had to file a motion to compel.··Six

·9· ·weeks late, we got a motion -- he finally gave us the

10· ·information.··His admissions were six weeks late.··And

11· ·because he was pro se and even though this Court

12· ·shouldn't give leniency, nor myself, I only picked very

13· ·specific documents.

14· · · · · · · · ·I picked five requests out of all requests

15· ·and he gave me almost no documents.··I picked five.

16· ·This Court ruled that he was to give me those five types

17· ·of documents, which I'm going to go through.

18· · · · · · · · ·So then we had -- so we had the hearing.

19· ·The day the documents were due, the day, he files an

20· ·entry of appearance -- the day before he files an entry

21· ·of appearance, and that day when the documents were due,

22· ·he filed a motion to reconsider.

23· · · · · · · · ·On the motion to reconsider, your Honor,

24· ·there was one thing that Mr. Barrett stated and that was

25· ·we're not giving the documents due to my client's right

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 19 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·to privacy.··I didn't even understand his document.··I

·2· ·even had to send him an e-mail and say, so you're not

·3· ·going to give me anything?··He said, no.

·4· · · · · · · · ·It wasn't until February 13th that

·5· ·he -- I'm sorry, your Honor, it was February 12th that

·6· ·he asserts the Rule 47.

·7· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Actually, that's not true.

·8· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Is it not true?

·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··No, it was in the additional

10· ·authority that we filed --

11· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.··If Mr. Barrett says there

12· ·was additional authority, then I do believe him, but

13· ·from what I have, it wasn't until very recently that he

14· ·asserts this Rule 47.··And if he states it was before

15· ·that, I --

16· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··I think it was the date of

17· ·our -- the first hearing that I

18· ·appeared -- December 4th --

19· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay, so December 4th.··So

20· ·October 16th, he files a motion to reconsider, only

21· ·concerning the invasion, that it's not the right to

22· ·privacy, which for bank records and phone records and

23· ·communication between Al Barcroft, which, by the way, he

24· ·asserts attorney-client privilege with anything

25· ·concerning Al Barcroft.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 20 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·So Howard Kirk being pro se and starting

·2· ·discovery himself, he waived and forfeited his own right

·3· ·to assert a Rule 47.··I mean, he -- I have it here.

·4· ·It's here where he started discovery and now they want

·5· ·to say, oh, we're not going to give it.

·6· · · · · · · · ·But if Mr. Barrett would like, we can go

·7· ·through everything that they object to and we can get

·8· ·another ruling today, but again, I want to reiterate the

·9· ·sanctions were not because of his behavior with the --

10· ·with not filing documents on time, which he wasn't

11· ·doing.

12· · · · · · · · ·And, your Honor, I don't believe this Court

13· ·would have allowed an individual who's represented by an

14· ·attorney to be six weeks late and allow them to amend

15· ·their admissions, which, by the way, your Honor, out of

16· ·over a hundred admissions, I believe only two were

17· ·actually answered, everything else was objected to,

18· ·attorney-client privilege, work product for his own

19· ·client.

20· · · · · · · · ·So if Mr. Barrett would like, I definitely

21· ·want the sanctions to be upheld, because it was because

22· ·of his behavior.··But let's go through all of discovery

23· ·that has been amended, so I can actually get documents.

24· · · · · · · · ·Your Honor, all we're asking for -- all we

25· ·asked for was bank records from January 1, phone

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 21 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·records -- I mean, I'm sorry, bank records to 2008,

·2· ·phone records from beginning of 2012, his tax returns --

·3· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Right --

·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··-- theft --

·5· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Which he objected to, but --

·6· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··And he said.

·7· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- he's part of litigation.

·8· ·Tax returns are relevant it's not a fishing expedition.

·9· ·In fact, this is the type of suit tax returns are

10· ·relevant, in my opinion.

11· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··And when we inquired about

12· ·communication with Al Barcroft, they

13· ·asserted attorney-client privilege and --

14· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··How can that be?

15· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Pardon me?

16· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Mr. Barcroft's not an attorney.

17· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Exactly.··But that is -- that's

18· ·when we got to the motion to quash, they keep asserting

19· ·-- look at here, your Honor, let me just show you some

20· ·things that I get to deal with.

21· · · · · · · · ·I ask, admit or deny, you alone were the

22· ·person who drafted your answer.··And he states, I object

23· ·as it violates work product and it's attorney-client

24· ·privilege.

25· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··But he didn't have an attorney.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 22 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Exactly.··Admit or deny that

·2· ·Al Barcroft assisted you with drafting your answer to

·3· ·this lawsuit.··And he says, I object to this request as

·4· ·it violates work product and attorney-client privilege.

·5· · · · · · · · ·Okay.··So admit or deny --

·6· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, that's being entirely

·7· ·disingenuous.

·8· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Your Honor --

·9· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, it is.··And I let him just

10· ·take --

11· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··May I for just a moment?

12· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes, you may.··But that is

13· ·being totally disingenuous with this Court and with the

14· ·seriousness of this litigation.

15· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··In the first place, if we're

16· ·going to discuss the objections, I have an objection to

17· ·going through all the objections to discovery that I

18· ·lodged after discovery was appropriate, when Counsel

19· ·finally amended her petition.

20· · · · · · · · ·But the objection to a request about who

21· ·prepared my client's answer was answered after the time

22· ·when I had prepared an answer and filed it on behalf of

23· ·my client --

24· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··This is his answer, right here

25· ·-- this is your answer.··I'm reading from your amended

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 23 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·answer --

·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Exactly.

·3· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··-- this is your document.

·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Exactly.··So, yes, when she

·5· ·wants to know who helped my client prepare his answer to

·6· ·this lawsuit, he had, at that point, filed two answers

·7· ·to the lawsuit, one of them he prepared as a pro se --

·8· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Which is the one that we were

·9· ·discussing in October, was it not?

10· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··No, your Honor, she's talking

11· ·about the objections that I lodged now.

12· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I know, but telling us we'd

13· ·have to go through all those, I see her point.

14· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··But, your Honor, I'm just trying

15· ·to show the point of -- let me just go back to -- the

16· ·documents that I have requested that he has amended, he

17· ·states -- so for bank statements, financial records from

18· ·January 1, 2008, he says it's privileged information.

19· ·What privilege?

20· · · · · · · · ·I asked him for a privilege law, and this

21· ·is -- this is not up for discussion today, I did a

22· ·motion overruling claims of privilege.··He asserts

23· ·privilege with Al Barcroft -- between Howard Kirk and

24· ·Albert Barcroft, attorney-client privilege.··When I ask

25· ·him for the privilege law, he says, none applied.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 24 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·So I'm going to be back here to deal with

·2· ·this.··So if he would like to go through, if he doesn't

·3· ·like -- and I'll tell you, your Honor, I completely

·4· ·don't agree with his reading of Rule 47.··It's a brand

·5· ·new rule.··There's very little case law on it.

·6· · · · · · · · ·But we did have the damages appropriately

·7· ·and in addition to that, Howard Kirk started discovery.

·8· ·So his client can start discovery and deliver discovery

·9· ·to me --

10· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··It wouldn't be fair for the

11· ·defendant to begin the discovery process and then later,

12· ·after the plaintiff has answered and then replied with

13· ·her discovery, to then bring up Rule 47 that you can't

14· ·do that.

15· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Your Honor, Rule 47 applies

16· ·only to the plaintiff.

17· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I see that.

18· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··There is no prohibition

19· ·against the defendant beginning discovery.··And whether

20· ·that's -- if it's somebody's idea of fundamental

21· ·fairness or not --

22· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··But as a judge, I've seen a lot

23· ·of different interpretations of a party that fails to

24· ·comply with (c) may not conduct discovery, I think

25· ·there's a big -- there's a "shall" -- that "it shall" be

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 25 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·in there, but very intentionally it looks like they put

·2· ·a "may" in this particular sentence --

·3· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Because discovery --

·4· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- discretion as to whether or

·5· ·not the Court feels like, not necessarily on the equity

·6· ·side of its docket, equity, in general, is this

·7· ·something the Court should do.··I just don't see --

·8· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··I disagree, your Honor.··The

·9· ·only case we have interpreting Rule 47 also agrees.

10· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, we'll find out then if

11· ·the appellate court says that even if the defendant

12· ·begins discovery and the plaintiff still cannot conduct

13· ·discovery until the plaintiff complies in toto with this

14· ·Rule 47, and the Court cannot interpret the word "may"

15· ·to authorize the sanctions to stand.

16· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··And your Honor --

17· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··So --

18· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··So I'm going to deny the

19· ·motion -- I'm going to deny the motion.··So we got that

20· ·done.

21· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Your Honor, may --

22· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··That's what we pay the people

23· ·down the street to do.

24· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I do have an order, your Honor.

25· ·Can I approach?

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 26 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Please.··And the Supreme Court

·2· ·should have said it was mandatory and the court has no

·3· ·discretion.··They should have put "shall" and not "may."

·4· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··And, your Honor --

·5· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··"May," generally, under my

·6· ·interpretation of law, when it says may not do

·7· ·something, it cannot be done on a regular basis.··It's

·8· ·not to be a pattern of conduct.··But they put "may"

·9· ·because the court, when it wants to, can find that

10· ·there's been circumstances -- extenuating circumstances

11· ·and not enforce the rule.

12· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Your Honor, there's a few blanks

13· ·here and the very first one is about when he needs to

14· ·provide me these documents.··Now keep in mind, the day

15· ·that -- one of -- at least one of the documents was due,

16· ·this is when the motion to reconsider was filed, so the

17· ·document should be available.

18· · · · · · · · ·And I -- we've been trying to fight for

19· ·these documents since June.··If we can get them in the

20· ·near future, that would be great.··I'd rather get them

21· ·sooner than later.

22· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Your Honor, with all due

23· ·respect, we intend to file a petition for writ of

24· ·mandamus on this order --

25· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Good -- good --

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 27 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··-- so we can get an answer to

·2· ·this question --

·3· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I think you should.··I totally

·4· ·like that, because we'll know -- we'll know exactly

·5· ·where the trial court's power begins and ends.

·6· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··But your Honor, he has to get a

·7· ·stay, so I still would like for us to put --

·8· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Give me a date, please, a

·9· ·suggested date.

10· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Well, I'd like it before -- I

11· ·mean, next week we're supposed to have a deposition

12· ·against his client who's been fighting us.

13· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··No way can I get them by next

14· ·week.

15· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··But he should have had these

16· ·available.

17· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··You got into the case back in

18· ·October or November -- excuse me, right at the --

19· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··It was October 16th.

20· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I mean, I welcome you.··I was

21· ·very glad to see -- I always welcome appearance of

22· ·counsel, especially in serious litigation where we have

23· ·someone acting pro se.

24· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··So I would like these documents

25· ·as soon as possible.··I'd like them the third of March,

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 28 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·so we can move forward with our March 4th deposition.

·2· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Let me see your notice -- the

·3· ·deposition is for March -- is that part of our

·4· ·protective order or something --

·5· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Yes, that's come up --

·6· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··That's what we're going to

·7· ·discuss.··I can't hold a deposition without these

·8· ·documents.··I need these documents.

·9· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, why don't I put this on

10· ·hold for a moment.

11· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.··And then one other

12· ·thing --

13· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··We'll come back to it.··I don't

14· ·know what I'm going to do about the other.

15· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Your Honor, can I just please

16· ·address one other thing in the order.··It cost almost

17· ·$1500 for me to prepare and come here.··And I would like

18· ·that, on top of the other sanctions that has been

19· ·approved.··And that's the very -- that's number 15.

20· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Your Honor -- number 15?

21· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I'm sorry, five.··Number five.

22· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Number five.··You were awarded

23· ·$2,800 the last time for the motion to compel?

24· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes.··And it's an additional

25· ·1,500 for me to prepare today.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 29 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··And what all has it taken for

·2· ·you to prepare for this?

·3· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Well, I had to draft two motions,

·4· ·I had to draft a motion for an objection, which I filed,

·5· ·your Honor, and then I also had to do a supplement to

·6· ·the response, because he filed a supplement, so I had to

·7· ·file that last week and I had to prepare for the hearing

·8· ·and be here.

·9· · · · · · · · ·It actually cost a little bit more than

10· ·1,500, but I just -- and I did look at my billing last

11· ·night to verify what the cost was.

12· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Your Honor, we brought forth

13· ·to this Court a good faith objection, a good faith

14· ·interpretation of the operation of the Rules of Civil

15· ·Procedure as it applies to this case.

16· · · · · · · · ·I mean, this -- the things that are going

17· ·on in this case and the number of times that Ms. Lee has

18· ·requested sanctions for any and everything are

19· ·absolutely astounding to me.

20· · · · · · · · ·I've been -- in 36 years of law practice, I

21· ·only need one hand to count the number of times I've

22· ·requested sanctions in a lawsuit, particularly over

23· ·the --

24· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, happens all the time in

25· ·this court --

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 30 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Obviously, your Honor, you agree,

·2· ·because the sanctions have already been handed down an

·3· ·this was --

·4· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I'm sorry, Mr. Barrett, you

·5· ·lost and I'm going to award the 1,500, which that

·6· ·doesn't sound like very much just for the paperwork

·7· ·involved.

·8· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Thank you.

·9· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··What would you like to take up

10· ·next, sir?

11· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··The motion to quash, the

12· ·motion for protective order, your Honor.

13· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Okay.··And let's see.··I

14· ·probably had this in order for me and I probably screwed

15· ·it up, so...

16· · · · · · · · ·All right.··The Court now has before it

17· ·plaintiffs' -- here it is.··The Court has before it,

18· ·filed February 2, 2015, motion to quash plaintiffs'

19· ·notice of intent to take oral deposition of Howard Kirk

20· ·Gibbs and motion for protective order, filed on behalf

21· ·of defendant, Howard Kirk Gibbs, by and through his

22· ·attorney of record, Daniel R. Barrett.

23· · · · · · · · ·So I have that in front of me and I have,

24· ·your response, plaintiffs' response, filed on

25· ·February 12th, and then I have the original copy, I

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 31 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·guess, of the notice, filed January 30, 2015,

·2· ·plaintiffs' notice of intent to take the oral deposition

·3· ·of Howard Kirk Gibbs.

·4· · · · · · · · ·So I believe I have every -- I have the

·5· ·necessary paperwork in front of me.

·6· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Your Honor, there was an amended

·7· ·notice of intent -- I did not file -- I only filed the

·8· ·one notice, because we were going to have it heard here,

·9· ·so I wanted the Court to be notified of it.

10· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Okay.

11· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··And I had talked to Tina about

12· ·it, but then I amended the notice , which -- it's the

13· ·same.

14· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··It's the same notice.

15· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··There are no issues with it?

16· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··No, it just corrects a

17· ·technical defect in the original.

18· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··All right.

19· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Your Honor, the point of the

20· ·motion to quash is my office is not in downtown

21· ·Fort Worth.··I, obviously, am not privy to everything

22· ·that went on -- or anything, actually, other than as

23· ·reflected by the documents that went on in this case

24· ·before I appeared --

25· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··But you did agree to take the

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 32 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·case and therefore, you took it as is, so to speak.

·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Right.··I understand, your

·3· ·Honor.··But the point is that in order for my client to

·4· ·be presented for deposition anywhere other than my

·5· ·office, which is -- presenting a witness at the

·6· ·attorney's office is the standard practice in Tarrant

·7· ·County and has --

·8· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··True.··Absolutely.

·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··And since I do not office in

10· ·downtown Fort Worth, it adds time for me to travel to

11· ·downtown Fort Worth in order to present my client for

12· ·deposition.

13· · · · · · · · ·When I received the notice, I understood

14· ·that -- that there had been some discussions with the

15· ·Court about having the depositions at the courthouse.

16· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Absolutely.

17· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··And I had seen --

18· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Which is a custom in this

19· ·court, maybe not everywhere else.··But when people can't

20· ·get along during a deposition, we just have it down

21· ·here.

22· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Right.··And up until this

23· ·time, my understanding is there had only been one

24· ·deposition taken in this case and that was the

25· ·deposition of Beverly Miller.··I mean --

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 33 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··That's right.

·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Is that correct?

·3· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes.

·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Okay.··I don't know what sort

·5· ·of history there was with my client in terms of his

·6· ·behavior inside the courtroom.··I don't know if he

·7· ·had -- if he had demonstrated some sort of contempt for

·8· ·or ignorance of or contempt because of ignorance of the

·9· ·rules, et cetera.

10· · · · · · · · ·I do know that, as an attorney, it's my

11· ·duty to make sure that my client, insofar as I possibly

12· ·can, obeys the Rules of Civil Procedure and responds

13· ·appropriately to deposition questions.··As an attorney,

14· ·it's my obligation to make sure that that happens.··And

15· ·I can do that at my office the same as I can do that

16· ·anywhere else.

17· · · · · · · · ·In order to have the deposition anywhere

18· ·else, other than my office, it will cost my client more

19· ·money, because of the travel time, attendant with

20· ·presenting him at a point geographically other than my

21· ·office.

22· · · · · · · · ·Now, the reason for the motion to quash is

23· ·because I believe that the discovery that has been

24· ·propounded in this case goes far, far, far afield of

25· ·those things that would be relevant to what actually has

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 34 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·been pled against my client in this case.

·2· · · · · · · · ·So the reason that the motion to quash and

·3· ·that the motion to protect -- motion for protective

·4· ·order were filed together was so that in connection with

·5· ·the protective order, the Court could give me guidance

·6· ·and plaintiffs' counsel guidance as to the parameters

·7· ·that the Court believes govern relevance in this case.

·8· · · · · · · · ·And then it would be my obligation to make

·9· ·sure that we respond within those parameters during the

10· ·deposition.··And the motion to quash is based upon, I

11· ·can do that in my office and it will be less expensive

12· ·for my client to do that in my office.

13· · · · · · · · ·Now, I have some documents -- that's just

14· ·an introductory statement.··I have some documents to

15· ·present to the Court, with the Court's permission, by

16· ·the way, the Court's taking of judicial notice of the

17· ·contents of its file applies to this hearing as well, am

18· ·I correct?

19· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Certainly, certainly.··And

20· ·Mr. Barrett, the Court has the utmost respect for you

21· ·and your representation and efforts.

22· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Thank you.

23· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··It has nothing to do with you.

24· ·I still say, again, I welcomed seeing your name.

25· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Thank you, your Honor.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 35 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Ms. -- before we go any

·2· ·further, Ms. Lee, are we sort of punishing this man

·3· ·because of the conduct -- the deposition of

·4· ·Beverly Miller was just abysmal, I thought.

·5· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··The conduct was awful.··And I

·6· ·would -- and I'm not --

·7· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··So are we punishing this

·8· ·defendant because of --

·9· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··No -- no, not at all, your Honor.

10· ·I can show you ample evidence that he -- they have

11· ·asserted -- and he has already -- and I have already

12· ·shown to you in here -- I have shown you his behavior

13· ·during the deposition, but --

14· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I interrupted his argument, but

15· ·I remember this was --

16· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··No, this has --

17· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- it was something at that

18· ·moment in time I thought was very appropriate that we

19· ·have the deposition down here, so I can be in my office

20· ·and come in and make on-the-ground -- on-the-spot

21· ·rulings.

22· · · · · · · · ·But I want to hear what Mr. -- it was

23· ·something -- I may reconsider this, you may be right and

24· ·it would cost him more money and I'm not sure

25· ·that -- well, we'll just see.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 36 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Your Honor, if I might.··What

·2· ·I've handed the Court is the pages of the deposition of

·3· ·Beverly Miller that Counsel has complained about my

·4· ·actions in connection with.

·5· · · · · · · · ·And she -- my understanding is that she

·6· ·puts forward this conduct as reflected on these pages as

·7· ·evidence of the fact that I cannot be depended upon

·8· ·to -- to be sure that my client abides by the Rules of

·9· ·Civil Procedure and responds appropriately in a

10· ·deposition.

11· · · · · · · · ·What I have presented is exactly the

12· ·transcript of exactly what happened during that

13· ·deposition.··And note, first of all, that it took place

14· ·184 pages into the testimony.··There was a question that

15· ·was propounded to Ms. Miller, the witness.

16· · · · · · · · ·The question was, So what type of

17· ·communication since November of 2013 have you had with

18· ·Howard Kirk Gibbs?

19· · · · · · · · ·My response at that point was, Wait a

20· ·minute.··Before you answer that question, I need to

21· ·speak with you, Earl.

22· · · · · · · · ·That is the last thing -- well, other than,

23· ·I don't care, we're going out of the room, that's the

24· ·last thing I said in this deposition until, I'll reserve

25· ·anything that I have --

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 37 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I'd like him to read this whole

·2· ·thing, your Honor, this is very important.

·3· · · · · · · · ·It says, Mr. Hargrave -- when I

·4· ·ask -- Mr. Hargrave says, wait a minute before you

·5· ·answer that question, I need to talk to you, Earl.

·6· · · · · · · · ·Mr. Hargrave says, okay.

·7· · · · · · · · ·Ms. Lee:··Want to go off the record?

·8· · · · · · · · ·Mr. Barrett states, yeah, I don't care,

·9· ·we're going out of the room.

10· · · · · · · · ·So there was a break for seven minutes.

11· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yeah, okay.

12· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Then Ms. Lee -- there's a

13· ·point -- Ms. Lee:··Can we go back on -- can we go back

14· ·and re-ask the question I asked previously, when you

15· ·took the break?

16· · · · · · · · ·The record was read.

17· · · · · · · · ·The witness states, No.

18· · · · · · · · ·Ms. Lee:··Have you had any conversations

19· ·with Howard Kirk concerning the transfer of

20· ·57.19 percent?

21· · · · · · · · ·Mr. Hargrave:··Objection, privilege.

22· · · · · · · · ·Ms. Lee:··Now, her talking to Howard Kirk

23· ·is not privileged.

24· · · · · · · · ·Mr. Hargrave:··Howard Kirk was pro se,

25· ·representing himself.··If you're talking about --

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 38 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·And then Ms. Lee:··Judge Ferchill has

·2· ·already stated that he was not an attorney and that the

·3· ·privilege does not assert him during the last hearing.

·4· ·This is what the judge stated.

·5· · · · · · · · ·Please answer my questions.

·6· · · · · · · · ·And then Mr. Hargrave:··Okay.··Okay.

·7· · · · · · · · ·The witness:··No.

·8· · · · · · · · ·Mr. Hargrave:··I'm instructing my client

·9· ·not to answer.

10· · · · · · · · ·Ms. Lee:··So you have talked to Al Barcroft

11· ·concerning 57.19 percent transfer since you transferred

12· ·the money in 2013?

13· · · · · · · · ·Mr. Hargrave:··The same objection.

14· ·Al Barcroft is representing himself, I believe.

15· · · · · · · · ·Ms. Lee:··Your objection's not relevant.

16· ·Please answer the question.

17· · · · · · · · ·Mr. Hargrave:··I'll instruct my client not

18· ·to answer.··You can mark it and take it up with the

19· ·judge.

20· · · · · · · · ·Your Honor, I'm not stating that -- that

21· ·Dan Barrett went out and talked to Earl Hargrave and

22· ·said, I want you to go out and assert attorney-client

23· ·privilege -- I'm not saying he said that.··If he said he

24· ·didn't say that, I would believe him.

25· · · · · · · · ·What I'm saying, this is what I get to deal

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 39 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·with.··We had to file a motion to compel for 150 "I

·2· ·don't knows."··And I have already shown you in the

·3· ·motion overruling privilege that Mr. Barrett is still

·4· ·stating privilege with Al Barcroft.

·5· · · · · · · · ·I'm not going to get any answers and not

·6· ·only am I asking this Court to be available, I'm

·7· ·actually changing my request --

·8· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Can I get back to my argument

·9· ·at this point?

10· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I want to change my request and

11· ·ask for Judge Morrisett to be present during the entire

12· ·hearing.··You've seen the other attorneys in this case,

13· ·I will not get any answers.

14· · · · · · · · ·Ms. Miller stated, when I answered her a

15· ·question, Who are the current beneficiaries of the GWB

16· ·Trust when you were the trustee?··And her answer was, I

17· ·don't know.··150 times she said, I don't know.

18· · · · · · · · ·Then I have to file a motion to compel to

19· ·get her to answer these questions --

20· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I think you already

21· ·demonstrated Ms. Miller is not much of a fiduciary.

22· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··That is true, your Honor.

23· · · · · · · · ·But I'm saying, I'm going to get

24· ·attorney-client privilege.··Again, in that document, he

25· ·already states that Al Barcroft and Howard Kirk,

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 40 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·attorney-client privilege.··On almost every document,

·2· ·every question I ask, he asserts privilege.··I'm not

·3· ·going to get any answers.

·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Your Honor, please --

·5· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes, let Mr. Barrett finish,

·6· ·please.··I'm still thinking about this.

·7· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Now -- all right.··Setting

·8· ·aside what actually happened in this deposition and none

·9· ·of this conduct was -- was mine.··Let's go to --

10· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··It was the atmosphere of

11· ·the entire -- it was the atmosphere of the deposition as

12· ·I read it, plus the atmosphere in the courtroom and your

13· ·client's behavior and just the whole -- just the general

14· ·temperature, if you will, of this case that inspired or

15· ·prompted the Court to say, okay, depositions will be in

16· ·the courtroom --

17· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Your Honor --

18· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- because it did seem like a

19· ·lot of foolishness and a lot of malingering and hiding

20· ·the ball and that's what I'm trying to avoid.

21· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··And I cannot speak to that

22· ·because I wasn't --

23· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I know, I know.··This is not

24· ·particularly egregious, let's put it that way.

25· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··In any event, let's go

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 41 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·next --

·2· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··So you would like have it in

·3· ·your office, that's number one?

·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··That's number one, Judge.

·5· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Okay.

·6· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··But let's look next at the

·7· ·amended petition in this case, that is the current live

·8· ·pleading for the plaintiffs.

·9· · · · · · · · ·I have handed the Court an excerpt of that

10· ·petition, the petition is some 28 pages long, I believe.

11· ·And the pages that I've handed to the Court are only

12· ·those pages that reference my client.··And I've

13· ·highlighted the places in which he's been referenced.

14· · · · · · · · ·And the facts -- there are some facts

15· ·alleged about Howard Kirk and Al Barcroft becoming

16· ·friends in 2004, something about Howard Kirk being found

17· ·guilty for simulating legal processes, whatever that is

18· ·and him being in jail for asserting the Fifth Amendment

19· ·and those types of things.

20· · · · · · · · ·I'm not sure why those have been alleged.

21· ·I filed special exceptions --

22· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, it -- given his behavior

23· ·as it was demonstrated and recounted by Ms. Lee, it kind

24· ·of explains some of his behavior in court --

25· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Well, it may, Judge, but in

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 42 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·terms of this pleading, what has been pled against him

·2· ·his as a legally cognizable cause of action, is what I'm

·3· ·getting at here.

·4· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··All right.

·5· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Okay.··Talks about, again, on

·6· ·the next page, in 2004 or 2005 as background, I suppose,

·7· ·how Al Barcroft got involved with this and that

·8· ·Howard Kirk was somehow instrumental in that.

·9· · · · · · · · ·Then on page six, there's some recitations

10· ·about the trust itself.··I don't know why page nine is

11· ·there, except that I thought it was interesting, there

12· ·are no allegations in those paragraphs as to my client.

13· · · · · · · · ·We skip to paragraph -- I mean, page 11, on

14· ·paragraph 33, where it talks about the friendship

15· ·between Howard Kirk and Albert.

16· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Okay.

17· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··And then it says Howard Kirk

18· ·conspired with Albert to use GWB Trust bank accounts as

19· ·their own personal.

20· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, I think civil conspiracy,

21· ·I think, is what she's, you know --

22· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Exactly.

23· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT: -- inching towards.

24· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··The point here is that we are

25· ·talking about transactions and facts, and the cause of

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 43 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·action that she has pled is related only to the GWB

·2· ·Trust and this transfer of assets from the GWB Trust to

·3· ·the GBU Trust.

·4· · · · · · · · ·The vast majority of the facts that are

·5· ·pled are in connection with what Al did in that.··And

·6· ·she says that Howard conspired with Al, somehow.··There

·7· ·are no specific acts that are alleged.

·8· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, I think that's what the

·9· ·deposition is for, is to question --

10· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Exactly, Judge.

11· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- had conversations, et cetera

12· ·--

13· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Judge, exactly.··And I'm not

14· ·trying to argue special exceptions here.

15· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I know, but --

16· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··I'm only trying to identify

17· ·and narrow what actually has been pled against my

18· ·client.

19· · · · · · · · ·The cause of action and the

20· ·transactions -- everything that has been pled against my

21· ·client in this lawsuit resolves around the transactions

22· ·involving the GWB Trust, the GBU Trust and there are

23· ·some allegations from some parties about the

24· ·applicability of this contract and the family settlement

25· ·agreement.··That's it.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 44 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·There's nothing that has been pled about

·2· ·any activities in connection with the estate.··Anything

·3· ·that happened ten or 15 years ago or five or ten -- how

·4· ·many years ago, with respect to the estate, the

·5· ·formation of these ancillary entities that have nothing

·6· ·to do with GWB or GBU or Pentex or any of those.

·7· ·There's no pleadings to support any of that.

·8· · · · · · · · ·The only thing that's been pled, true or

·9· ·not, and that's what discovery in the trial is for.··But

10· ·the only thing pled in this case is a cause of action --

11· ·if we look on page 20, the causes of action start.··The

12· ·fraud is pled in connection with a leading to conspiracy

13· ·with Beverly, Howard Kirk and Danny, with respect to the

14· ·GWB Trust assets.

15· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Okay.

16· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Fraudulent -- Howard's not

17· ·included in that, even though it's not a cause of

18· ·action.

19· · · · · · · · ·64, civil conspiracy and intentional

20· ·infliction of emotional distress.··All in connection

21· ·with only the GWB Trust assets, okay?

22· · · · · · · · ·Conversion, theft, and unjust enrichment.

23· ·Again, she alleges that Howard is guilty of this because

24· ·his is a beneficiary of the GBU Trust.··A fact which she

25· ·has to prove and that's up for discussion, okay?··But

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 45 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·again, it's confined to GWB, GBU and the transactions

·2· ·involving those two entities.

·3· · · · · · · · ·Paragraph 79 on page 25 in her request for

·4· ·relief, again compelling -- she requests that

·5· ·Howard Kirk be compelled to return to GWB Trust any

·6· ·assets that he illegally received.

·7· · · · · · · · ·In 82 she requests that the Court terminate

·8· ·the GWB Trust, which is a request, frankly, we're going

·9· ·agree with at some point.

10· · · · · · · · ·And in damages there, she has actually pled

11· ·under Rule 47 what she needed to plead.··On paragraph

12· ·seven, rule -- paragraph Roman Numeral VII paragraph --

13· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··She's circumstantially cured --

14· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Right --

15· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- your alleged defect?

16· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··-- she has cured it.··And we

17· ·admit she cured it on December 22nd.

18· · · · · · · · ·Her request for attorney's fees and request

19· ·for disclosure and that's it.

20· · · · · · · · ·There is nothing in this petition --

21· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Just a minute, Ms. Lee.

22· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··There's nothing in this

23· ·petition that involves the estate and Ms. Lee has said

24· ·many times during the course -- well, actually, she said

25· ·both things.··I've heard both things in this courtroom.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 46 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·That this case doesn't involve anything other than the

·2· ·trust.··This is only a trust case, this is only a case

·3· ·about the trust and trust administration, removal of the

·4· ·trustee and breach of fiduciary duty.

·5· · · · · · · · ·And that's fine.··But that's the point of

·6· ·this.··If we move on -- just as a reminder, your Honor,

·7· ·under Rules of Civil Procedure 192.3, the scope of

·8· ·discovery is such that a party my obtain discovery of

·9· ·matters that are relevant to the subject matter of the

10· ·pending action --

11· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Okay.

12· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··-- and no other action.

13· · · · · · · · ·Now, one thing that is abundantly clear to

14· ·everyone -- it became very clear to me when I got

15· ·involved in this case, and I know it's been abundantly

16· ·clear to the Court, is that -- and I think there will be

17· ·no dispute among anyone, the parties in this case, the

18· ·siblings in the trust don't get along.

19· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Oh, absolutely.

20· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··And there are --

21· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Unlike most of our siblings,

22· ·these people have money to fight with.

23· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Right.··But there may be

24· ·other controversies between these, too.··My

25· ·understanding is that there was another action filed in

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 47 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·connection with the estate against Mr. Gibbs, there's

·2· ·this Fannin County lawsuit, there may be all kinds of

·3· ·other things.

·4· · · · · · · · ·But what we are confined with, what we are

·5· ·constricted to by the Rules of Civil -- Rules of

·6· ·Procedure in determining the scope of discovery

·7· ·applicable to this case is the allegations in this case

·8· ·and none other.

·9· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··True.··But the documents and

10· ·the parameters in the Court's motion to -- the granting

11· ·of the motion to compel and sanctions, the dates for the

12· ·telephone records, the bank records and the income

13· ·taxes, aren't those the parameters, what she's -- what

14· ·I've ordered?··I mean, 2008 bank records, 2009 telephone

15· ·records, last couple of income taxes -- -

16· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, your Honor --

17· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··If --

18· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··-- well --

19· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Okay.··But I'm just saying,

20· ·have we sort of established some parameters?

21· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Well, I believe not, Judge.

22· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Okay.··Why not?

23· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··My attitude with respect to

24· ·that, if -- first of all, I don't think it's timely for

25· ·us to be discussing the objections to the written

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 48 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·discovery in the case --

·2· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Okay.

·3· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··-- because what we're talking

·4· ·about, right now, is the parameters for questions during

·5· ·the deposition, but --

·6· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··But usually -- usually in a

·7· ·deposition, you want to go back and get answers to

·8· ·questions that you didn't get -- that you did not get in

·9· ·your written discovery or -- and/or clarifications of

10· ·answers you did or didn't get in your written discovery.

11· · · · · · · · ·So it all -- it's building up -- it's

12· ·building a pyramid, so to speak.

13· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··That certainly is part of it

14· ·Judge.

16· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Our position with respect to

17· ·that is, in the first place, bank account from 2008 have

18· ·nothing to do or anything from 2008 has nothing to do

19· ·with the allegations in this lawsuit, which are limited

20· ·to activities that occurred in the latter part of 2013

21· ·to date.

22· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Your Honor, that's just

23· ·absolutely wrong.

24· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Let him finish.··Let him

25· ·finish.··Because?

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 49 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Because what we're talking

·2· ·about in the -- the milieu in which this whole thing

·3· ·arose was the activities of the trustee being instructed

·4· ·by --

·5· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··When was she appointed trustee,

·6· ·Beverly Miller?

·7· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··At some point in the past --

·8· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I know.··But wouldn't that be a

·9· ·date -- how -- is part of your civil conspiracy the

10· ·placement of Beverly Miller in her position of trustee?

11· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Part of it, your Honor.··But it's

12· ·very extensive.··She started in March of 2011 --

13· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··That's what inferring that

14· ·somehow she was chosen -- I don't know how she was

15· ·chosen, but I inferred you felt she was a pawn or --

16· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··It was Albert Barcroft that chose

17· ·her.

18· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- a straw man.

19· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Your Honor, I think I'm -- can I

20· ·please proceed.

21· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··No, let him finish.··It's his

22· ·motion.

23· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.

24· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I can keep more than one ball

25· ·in the air at one time.··I can remember what he said.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 50 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Now, next, your Honor,

·2· ·simply, again as a reminder that Rule 192.6 of the Texas

·3· ·Rules of Civil Procedure is one of the -- not the sub

·4· ·rules, sister rules, I guess, of the whole discovery,

·5· ·scope of discovery question.··And it makes very clear

·6· ·that protective orders are available and require -- from

·7· ·the court, to protect the movant from undue harassment,

·8· ·annoyance -- excuse me -- or invasion of personal

·9· ·rights.··And the courts may make any order in the

10· ·interest of justice, among other things --

12· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··-- to limit the scope of

13· ·discovery.

14· · · · · · · · ·Under 192.5, work product, and there's been

15· ·a lot of talk in this case about attorney-client

16· ·privilege and the -- what's sometimes referred to as the

17· ·joint defense privilege that people sometimes assert

18· ·under Rules of Evidence 503.

19· · · · · · · · ·What I want to point out here is that in

20· ·our objections -- well, it's in our objections, but in

21· ·connection with the deposition, which is what we're

22· ·talking about --

23· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes, sir.

24· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··-- work product does not --

25· ·is not --

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 51 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Not just with attorneys --

·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··-- is not synonymous with

·3· ·attorneys --

·4· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- I'm with you.··Okay.··I got

·5· ·you.

·6· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Now, and according to the

·7· ·rule, work product is material prepared or mental

·8· ·impressions developed or communications made by or for a

·9· ·party in connection with the party's representatives,

10· ·which includes consultants and virtually anybody else

11· ·that the party communicates with, provided those

12· ·communications are made in anticipation of litigation or

13· ·for trial.

14· · · · · · · · ·The case law that has -- and there

15· ·is -- there is myriad case law construing this work

16· ·product exception to the scope of discovery.

17· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··But now, isn't this exactly the

18· ·reason why we'd have a deposition here in the courtroom,

19· ·in order for this Court to determine -- I see you have

20· ·consultants underlined, to determine whether or not

21· ·Mr. Barcroft actually was a co-conspirator or a

22· ·consultant?

23· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··If the question is, what did

24· ·you talk to Al Barcroft about in connection with

25· ·preparation of your answer in this lawsuit, that's work

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 52 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·product.

·2· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··If, indeed, he fits the

·3· ·definition of a consultant.··He's certainly not a

·4· ·surety, indemnitor, not an employer, or agent, so I

·5· ·guess a lot is going to be on what is the legal

·6· ·definition of a consultant is.

·7· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··And it's the purpose --

·8· ·according to case law, it's the purpose of the

·9· ·communication --

10· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I'm wondering if it's not like

11· ·a jury consultant --

12· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··No, your Honor --

13· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- which people use all the

14· ·time --

15· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Your Honor, I don't think it's a

16· ·codefendant in a lawsuit --

17· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I don't think it's a

18· ·codefendant either.

19· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··There is no exception for

20· ·co-parties in a lawsuit.··The point --

21· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··No --

22· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··May I?··The point -- the

23· ·point to this work product rule, as has been revealed by

24· ·the case law construing it, is that what's protected is

25· ·the strategic process of a party or whoever the party

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 53 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·communicates with in preparing for or antic -- preparing

·2· ·for trial or anticipating the litigation.

·3· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Including a codefendant who may

·4· ·be a co-conspirator?

·5· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Anybody.··Anybody.

·6· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··So you'd never be able to

·7· ·pierce the veil of conspiracy under your theory.

·8· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··That is -- that is not

·9· ·correct, your Honor.

10· · · · · · · · ·If the question -- if the subject matter of

11· ·the question involves conversations about the trust

12· ·before the lawsuit and not the lawsuit itself, then

13· ·there's nothing wrong with that. Those conversations are

14· ·free and clear and a proper -- proper subject of

15· ·discovery.

16· · · · · · · · ·But if it's a question that involved

17· ·strategy in connections with the defense of this lawsuit

18· ·-- it's a narrow exception, but it's well recognized,

19· ·it's enshrined in the rules and the case law is

20· ·abundant, that has interpreted it that way, that you

21· ·cannot inquire as to an opposing party's strategy in

22· ·connection with defending a lawsuit --

23· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··All right.

24· · · · · · · · ·MR BARRETT:··You can't do it.··Now --

25· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··You're not finished yet?

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 54 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··I'm not finished, yet.

·2· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··All right.

·3· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··I'm going to go ahead and

·4· ·give these to the Court, first.··What this is, your

·5· ·Honor, is simply copies of our responses to the requests

·6· ·for admissions from both Candy and Ken, that were made

·7· ·after December 22nd, when the plaintiff was entitled to

·8· ·them to -- to conduct discovery.

·9· · · · · · · · ·And there were -- first of all, there were

10· ·like 165 or so, 170, requests for admissions between the

11· ·two of them, which is, for a case that involves only

12· ·this trust and -- and the question of conspiracy

13· ·regarding this trust and the GBU Trust, kind of

14· ·astounding to me that there were that many.··But we

15· ·didn't request relief from the Court based on the number

16· ·of requests for admissions.

17· · · · · · · · ·But if you will look at the requests for

18· ·admission themselves, starting with Candy's, four talks

19· ·about, that you were the person that drafted your

20· ·answer.··That would be work product --

21· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Your Honor, I would like to -- I

22· ·would like the Court to note that these -- these were

23· ·given to Howard Kirk prior to Mr. Barcroft --

24· ·Mr. Barrett becoming his attorney.··And the answer -- it

25· ·doesn't ask for the answer, not the amended answer, so

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 55 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·there shouldn't be a work product.··And there's --

·2· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Continue.··I'm listening.

·3· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··In any event, it doesn't

·4· ·matter who drafted the answer, the point is the drafting

·5· ·of the answer is work product and it doesn't have to be

·6· ·by an attorney.

·7· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I understand what the rule

·8· ·says.

·9· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··I'm sorry --

10· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I'm not sure if it fits.

11· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Let's go on to some others,

12· ·Judge.··Request number 11, admit or deny that you're

13· ·paying at least 2,000 a month for the home in which

14· ·you're now living.

15· · · · · · · · ·What does that have to do with the alleged

16· ·conspiracy?

17· · · · · · · · ·That your current residence is considerably

18· ·larger than the last home you were living in; that you

19· ·and your wife are always short on money; that you've

20· ·had -- that you have jobs outside that earn insufficient

21· ·money that enable you and your family to move into this

22· ·big home.

23· · · · · · · · ·Things about the estate.··Request

24· ·number 21, that you drove outside of the state of Texas

25· ·in August of 2004 to collect a check over $500,000 drawn

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 56 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·from an account owned by KCH Investments, LLC.··Your

·2· ·Honor, that doesn't have a thing to do -- it's not even

·3· ·conceivably within any of the issues in this lawsuit.

·4· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Okay.··We'll hear about that.

·5· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··I'm sorry?

·6· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I said we'll hear about that in

·7· ·a minute.··Okay.

·8· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··That you did an out of state

·9· ·withdrawal of $508,000 in cashier's checks from this KHC

10· ·Investments, that you didn't tell Ken or Candy about.

11· · · · · · · · ·Admit or deny that you spent the 508 for

12· ·your own benefit.··What -- none of those things have

13· ·anything to do with this lawsuit.

14· · · · · · · · ·In February and March of 2005, after your

15· ·father had already passed away, you received over a

16· ·hundred thousand dollars more from his estate and

17· ·expended -- those are estate matters, which again, are

18· ·not involved in the allegations that are made in this

19· ·lawsuit.

20· · · · · · · · ·I mean, there are -- there's more about

21· ·this 508,000, about KCH Investments, about people who

22· ·have not been identified or in these KHC Investments.

23· ·All of this, by my count, out of the 170 -- let's see

24· ·175 requests for admissions, well over 80 of them deal

25· ·with things that are either protected by the party work

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 57 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·product rule or the vast majority of them are about

·2· ·things that may or may not have occurred in 2004, in

·3· ·2005 and involve entities that are in no way connected

·4· ·with this pending litigation.

·5· · · · · · · · ·So the point of the motion for protective

·6· ·order is if we can establish, from the Court, guidelines

·7· ·that these other ancillary matters are not relevant to

·8· ·this lawsuit and not a proper subject for deposition

·9· ·questions, we can get through the deposition pretty

10· ·quickly.

11· · · · · · · · ·And I will know what to instruct my client

12· ·to answer, and if she strays beyond what the parameters

13· ·that the Court has set, then I'll be entitled to tell

14· ·him not to.··That's the point of all this.

15· · · · · · · · ·Now, the --

16· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··But now we've got -- we've got

17· ·a more fundamental problem here and -- and if -- that's

18· ·whether or not the Court and Ms. Lee are supposed to

19· ·just automatically accept Mr. Barcroft's any alleged

20· ·conversations with him or anybody else who's not an

21· ·attorney, but is a defendant, on how to answer this

22· ·lawsuit and strategize, I'm not sure -- I don't think

23· ·I'm going to buy that, because we -- I'm still concerned

24· ·about co-conspirators being able to put up a shield of

25· ·saying, we're a consultant.··I don't think that's what

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 58 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·that word means.

·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Well, your Honor --

·3· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I really don't.··So somehow or

·4· ·another, we've got to get a ruling on whether or not

·5· ·people who allegedly talked to your client about how he

·6· ·was going to answer and how to strategize their, quote,

·7· ·his defense or their defense, how to categorize them as,

·8· ·quote/unquote, consultant.··That -- to me, that's a

·9· ·seminal sort --

10· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··The bright line that the

11· ·cases in the rule draws, whether or not it's in

12· ·anticipation -- it's in anticipation of litigation --

13· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··But wouldn't -- but wouldn't

14· ·co-conspirators, before they've already gotten halfway

15· ·to the courthouse, figure out that -- that, you know,

16· ·there's trouble ahead and therefore, it would be

17· ·planning their joint --

18· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Joint what?··Joint defense to

19· ·a civil lawsuit?

20· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, possibly.··I don't know.

21· ·I don't even know what they talked about, but I don't

22· ·see why she shouldn't be able to ask these questions

23· ·about conversations that occurred with non-attorneys.··I

24· ·don't see why she shouldn't.

25· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Okay.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 59 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I mean, what's -- other than

·2· ·you -- you're just saying, quote, well, he's a

·3· ·consultant; I consulted with somebody.

·4· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Well, your Honor, if the

·5· ·conversation took place in the calendar year 2013, it

·6· ·obviously, didn't have anything to do with the

·7· ·litigation, and it would have to do with transactions

·8· ·that are the basis of this lawsuit.

·9· · · · · · · · ·If it took place --

10· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··That could be true.··And

11· ·again, we're getting back to co-conspirators --

12· ·alleged -- alleged.

13· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Well, in which case, those

14· ·conversations are fair game.··They couldn't possibly

15· ·have been in anticipation of this litigation.

16· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I don't know about that part.

17· ·That's why I still get back to the point that it seems

18· ·like that the deposition should be here in the

19· ·courtroom, so that I can decide what your client should

20· ·or shouldn't answer, but be that as it may, I will give

21· ·you another chance to finish.

22· · · · · · · · ·Let me hear -- you've been about to jump

23· ·out of your shoes.

24· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I'm going to -- I'm going to do

25· ·it backwards.··I'm going to start from where he ended.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 60 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·Your Honor, I'm allowed -- or any attorney

·2· ·is allowed to ask a witness any information that goes to

·3· ·the credibility of the witness, and that is what these

·4· ·questions are about.

·5· · · · · · · · ·In addition, in his answer, Al Barcroft

·6· ·talks extensively about the contract for sale.··So he's

·7· ·alleging I can't even bring that up?··That was signed in

·8· ·2005.

·9· · · · · · · · ·Your Honor, this is what they're stating,

10· ·that the trust document doesn't exist and that's it's

11· ·the contract for sale that's the relevant document --

12· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··But -- but -- but -- but I'm

13· ·having trouble understanding why the family settlement

14· ·agreement didn't just render the whole contract for sale

15· ·irrelevant --

16· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··It did, your Honor, and that's

17· ·why --

18· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- I mean, why do I care what

19· ·happened back then?··Because it's been all be superceded

20· ·by the family settlement agreement, for better or worse.

21· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Exactly, your Honor, and it has

22· ·and that is one of our arguments.

23· · · · · · · · ·Al Barcroft and Howard Kirk started -- they

24· ·met each other in 2004.··That is when they became

25· ·friends.··They have been fast friends.··They are

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 61 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·both -- there are certain questions that go back to

·2· ·2004.··I'm not going to ask him things about medical or

·3· ·-- I'm going ask him things that are very pertinent to

·4· ·this case.

·5· · · · · · · · ·In addition, I think if you look at all the

·6· ·things he highlighted, he acts like I don't ask about

·7· ·anything.··And I do talk about 2004 and '5.··That's how

·8· ·my clients met Al Barcroft.··Al Barcroft knew

·9· ·Howard Kirk.··Howard Kirk brought him along.

10· · · · · · · · ·That's when the family settlement -- I'm

11· ·sorry, that's when the contract for sale was signed, and

12· ·then they became friends and they continued to work

13· ·together.··And then the family settlement agreement was

14· ·signed in 2008.

15· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··So for back story or history?

16· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, there is information that I

17· ·need to know to about.··And the KCH Investments has to

18· ·do with his credibility as a witness and his --

19· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Is that that --what's Tate,

20· ·LLC?··What's that got to do with anything?

21· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··These are businesses.··He creates

22· ·businesses and then doesn't work them.··If you do a

23· ·search on him, he has business after business after

24· ·business.··It shows his inability, his financial issues,

25· ·that's why he borrowed money from Al Barcroft, that's

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 62 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·why he conspired with Al Barcroft in order to steal

·2· ·57.19 percent of interest out of this trust.

·3· · · · · · · · ·We have proof from e-mails from Al Barcroft

·4· ·that when he stated, I'll give you back all the money

·5· ·and then everybody will be made whole, well it -- it's

·6· ·not just -- I mean, he wants to stop this January 1,

·7· ·2013, and only talk about GWB or GBU.

·8· · · · · · · · ·We have the family settlement agreement.

·9· ·What about Pentex Royalty Trust, what about Pentex

10· ·Foundation, where he's borrowed money from, and the --

11· ·are you okay?

12· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Yeah.··I'm sorry --

13· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.··And Pentex Foundation, he

14· ·doesn't want me to even discuss that, at all.

15· · · · · · · · ·And, your Honor, discovery is sought -- the

16· ·discovery that I am seeking is well within the scope of

17· ·allowable and discoverable information.··And I'm allowed

18· ·to ask anything that's going to be calculated to lead to

19· ·relevant evidence.

20· · · · · · · · ·And not only that, but we go into, I have

21· ·him arguing -- this is what I'm going to have to deal

22· ·with on the day of the deposition, is him arguing work

23· ·product between an opposing party.··The questions that I

24· ·have asked, which he objects to all kinds of substantial

25· ·questions, privilege between these two individuals or

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 63 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·work product or some other privilege and I'm not going

·2· ·to get any answers.

·3· · · · · · · · ·And not only that, your Honor, his

·4· ·statement about him coming here is, frankly, laughable.

·5· ·I mean, he's a litigator.··He comes to the Tarrant

·6· ·County courthouse.··Your Honor, my main office is in

·7· ·Alaska and I haven't asked anybody to pay for my commute

·8· ·from Alaska to here.··I mean, that --

·9· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Really?

10· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, my main office is in Alaska,

11· ·your Honor.

12· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I had no idea.

13· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yes, I have two offices.··So I

14· ·have to fly down here.··I haven't asked my clients, I

15· ·haven't asked opposing parties to reimburse me for any

16· ·costs.··He's a litigator in Tarrant County.

17· · · · · · · · ·And as I stated earlier, I actually would

18· ·request that Judge Morrisett sit in on the entire

19· ·deposition, only for the purposes -- because I believe

20· ·we will be getting up a lot in coming in here and

21· ·talking to you, to get you to come in there so that we

22· ·can have a ruling on getting an answer --

23· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Judge Morrisett probably has

24· ·more to do.··If I'm here, I would be the one in charge

25· ·any way.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 64 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.··Your Honor, I just was

·2· ·offering that up --

·3· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··I do like to use him for

·4· ·discovery matters, but ultimately, this is going to

·5· ·be -- needs to be done by me.

·6· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··As he went on and on and on about

·7· ·these things are not -- these are all things that has

·8· ·led up to what Howard Kirk and Al Barcroft and

·9· ·Beverly Miller and Danny Unger, what they did in order

10· ·to steal these assets from my clients.

11· · · · · · · · ·And he wants me to just tailor it from

12· ·January 1, he's been borrowing money from 2008, from

13· ·Pentex and Al Barcroft --

14· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, I guess, the thing about

15· ·the house is, one thing people try to do is show a

16· ·difference in lifestyle when they're trying to prove

17· ·there may be some conversion of a trust.··That's not

18· ·unusual --

19· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··That's why there's --

20· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- a big change in lifestyle.

21· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··That's the questions --

22· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··It may or may not have anything

23· ·to do with your allegations, but I think it would be

24· ·fair game.

25· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Yeah, that's the reason that I'm

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 65 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·asking those questions, to look at his lifestyle.··He's

·2· ·sustained a lifestyle that he cannot sustain on the

·3· ·money that's coming into him with no employment.··Those

·4· ·are all relevant questions for me to ask.

·5· · · · · · · · ·But he wants to bar me from doing that and

·6· ·have it at his office and guess what's going to happen

·7· ·if we have at his office?··What do you think?··We're

·8· ·going to be right back here with another motion, because

·9· ·I didn't get any of the answers that I wanted.

10· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Sometimes that's part of

11· ·litigation, but okay.

12· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Your Honor, one other

13· ·thing --

14· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Last word it's your motion.

15· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··One thing I need to point

16· ·out --

18· · · · · · · · ·MS. BARRETT:··Were you done?

19· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··I did have one more thing, your

20· ·Honor -- I'm sorry.

21· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··That's all right.

22· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··It's just one quick thing about

23· ·him -- there is no case law -- because we looked, there

24· ·is no case law that provides that the deposition for the

25· ·defendant -- the deposition of anybody has to be in

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 66 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·their attorney's office.

·2· · · · · · · · ·Now, that is common practice, but if you

·3· ·look at Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 199.2, the

·4· ·appropriate places for depositions are in the place of

·5· ·residence, that's in Tarrant County, that's where he

·6· ·lives, and the county where the suit's filed, that's

·7· ·Tarrant County.··So it's all fair game in Tarrant

·8· ·County.

·9· · · · · · · · ·And this is a neutral place, it's

10· ·tot -- I'm not asking for it to be in my office.··And

11· ·it's a neutral location.··Thank you.

12· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Judge, I want to point out,

13· ·in connection with her argument that these specific acts

14· ·of Howard in the past, with respect to KCH Investments

15· ·and borrowing or -- or the $508,000 withdrawal and all

16· ·these things that took place somewhat long ago she says

17· ·are relevant to assess the credibility of the witness

18· ·and all that.

19· · · · · · · · ·I need to point out that Rule 608

20· ·specifically says -- Rule 608 of the Texas Rules of

21· ·Evidence says that specific instances of conduct of a

22· ·witness for the purpose of attacking or supporting the

23· ·witness's credibility, other than conviction of a crime

24· ·as provided in Rule 609, which itself has a ten-year --

25· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Ten year, I understand.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 67 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Yeah, may not be inquired

·2· ·into on cross-examination of the witness, nor proved by

·3· ·extrensic -- extrinsic evidence.

·4· · · · · · · · ·So even if these things were relevant to

·5· ·Howard's credibility, that he had a failed business in

·6· ·the past and he -- whatever it is with this KHC

·7· ·Investments or people that he knows or involved in that,

·8· ·none of those things have anything to do with this

·9· ·lawsuit and can't be used for impeachment as she claims.

10· · · · · · · · ·So again, I mean, I --

11· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, I don't know if they can

12· ·be used for impeachment, but I think if the -- if

13· ·the nucleus of this began in 2004, then I think, like I

14· ·said, for back story purposes and for getting

15· ·information, I think he should be -- answer those in

16· ·deposition.··Whether or not they are appropriate to be

17· ·used for impeachment at a trial is a whole other matter.

18· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Well, if they might lead to

19· ·admissible evidence, but Judge, all of the allegations

20· ·in the lawsuit are confined to this trust and

21· ·Beverly Miller's actions as the trustee.

22· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Exactly.··And this whole

23· ·saga -- this is not a -- this is not a window in time

24· ·with bright light -- with a bright line, so to speak,

25· ·this is a -- she's alleged this sort of saga, it's the

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 68 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·only word I can think about it.

·2· · · · · · · · ·How much of it would go -- would be too old

·3· ·to be admissible actually?··At a trial, I don't know.

·4· ·That's why I still think we ought to have a deposition

·5· ·here, because this -- obviously, I can tell right now,

·6· ·you've made a very good case that we're going -- there's

·7· ·a lot of questions come up in that deposition.

·8· · · · · · · · ·And I don't know if there's a bunch of

·9· ·failed business.··I don't know if he had one or a

10· ·hundred failed businesses, I don't know if that has

11· ·anything to do with anything.

12· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Then without withdrawing --

13· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··But if somehow she was able to

14· ·allege there was some kind of fraud or pulling out of

15· ·assets that made those businesses fail that were a

16· ·pattern, then that might say something --

17· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··About this trust?

18· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, about his behavior.··And

19· ·how -- her whole -- her whole thing is that there's

20· ·fraud and conspiracy abound.··And I don't know if she's,

21· ·you know, if they're paranoid or they're onto something.

22· ·That's what this is all about.

23· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··Can we -- I understand the

24· ·Court's ruling.··Can we stop without me withdrawing my

25· ·technical objection and -- because, frankly --

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 69 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··We'll be off the record for a

·2· ·moment.

·3· · · · · · · · ·(Off the record)

·4· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··We're going to go back on the

·5· ·record.··And the Court finds from the arguments and from

·6· ·taking judicial notice of its file and its previous

·7· ·hearings, that it is in the interest of justice, the

·8· ·administration of justice, to have the deposition occur

·9· ·in this courtroom.

10· · · · · · · · ·And the Court will be available to make

11· ·contemporaneous rulings on the admissibility of evidence

12· ·or the objections -- sustain objections.··And the

13· ·Court's going to, at this point, deny a protective

14· ·order.

15· · · · · · · · ·Now, if you-all want to come to me with

16· ·some agreed -- y'all can work out some kind of agreed

17· ·parameters to make this thing go faster, the Court would

18· ·welcome it, but I don't see that I'm in a position to

19· ·order or direct any particular parameters at this time.

20· ·I'm afraid we're going to have to get our feet wet and

21· ·get into the deposition to find that out.

22· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Can we address both of the

23· ·orders, then, your Honor, because the other one we have

24· ·it scheduled for March 4th, but --

25· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··My courtroom is scheduled for

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 70 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· ·March 4th --

·2· · · · · · · · ·MR. LEE:··Yes, your Honor, it's already

·3· ·scheduled, but I don't have any documents and so I

·4· ·requested --

·5· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, he needs to get them to

·6· ·you before March 4th.

·7· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.··So -- and then --

·8· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··So --

·9· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··So do you want to do this motion

10· ·first, the motion to quash?··So the schedule -- do you

11· ·want to keep it March 4th?

12· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes, I overrule the motion to

13· ·quash and the deposition remains March 4th in this

14· ·courtroom.··At what did I say 9:00, 9:30?··Did we set up

15· ·a time?

16· · · · · · · · ·MR. BARRETT:··I think it's 9:00 --

17· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··9:30 is fine.··We can start at

18· ·10:00 if you want, if you need at little more time to

19· ·prepare in the morning. There's a lot to be done.··I

20· ·don't mind 10 o'clock.··I always have things to do when

21· ·I get here.

22· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.··Let's do 10:00.

23· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Ten will be good, because

24· ·there's a myriad of things I have to deal with when I

25· ·walk in every morning.

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 Page 71 MOTION HEARING - February 27, 2015

·1· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··And, your Honor, and also for

·2· ·this motion, and I know that it upsets him, but we are

·3· ·asking for sanctions again, because we're here, yet

·4· ·again, to deal with this, when, your Honor, there were

·5· ·some things you haven't -- this is the fourth time that

·6· ·this deposition had been scheduled.

·7· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Well, this is the first time

·8· ·Mr. Barrett has made any requests --

·9· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Okay.

10· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··-- and I'll deny any sanctions.

11· ·I'll give you attorney fees on the reconsider.

12· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··Thank you, you Honor.··And then

13· ·the motion to reconsider, the number two would be no

14· ·later than -- if the deposition's the fourth, I really

15· ·would like to have them the third --

16· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Oh, of course the third. I was

17· ·thinking --

18· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··And then he can sign on that

19· ·date -- on the third, also, the form 4506, which is for

20· ·me to have access to tax returns to verify that what he

21· ·provides me is accurate.

22· · · · · · · · ·THE COURT:··Yes.

23· · · · · · · · ·MS. LEE:··And then number five on the

24· ·sanctions, can we please put a date on when he needs to

25· ·pay my clients those sanctions?

CRC for WELLS REPORTING (817) 524-6644 a02461df-528d-4cf2-b967-ac191c470092 73

17 was paid/will be paid by Mr. Dan Barrett .

18 WITNESS MY OFFICIAL HAND this the 10th day of

21 ASHLEE WELLS, Texas CSR 8684 Expiration Date: 12/31/15 22 Official Court Reporter, Probate Court No. 2 23 Tarrant County, Texas