In re Howard

564 F. App'x 1026
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMay 6, 2014
DocketNo. 2014-125
StatusPublished

This text of 564 F. App'x 1026 (In re Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Howard, 564 F. App'x 1026 (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sherman Howard (“Howard”) petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) to issue a final decision in Howard v. Department of the Air Force, DA-0752-09-0172C-1. Howard also seeks attorney fees and costs associated with filing this petition pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The MSPB opposes.

Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, available only where the petitioner shows: (1) a clear legal right to relief; (2) there are no adequate alternative legal channels through which he may obtain that relief; and (3) the grant of mandamus is appropriate under the circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court, 542 U.S. 367, 380-81, 124 S.Ct. 2576, 159 L.Ed.2d 459 (2004); Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 403, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976). In denying this requested relief, we note that on the same day Howard filed'this petition the MSPB issued its decision in DA-0752-09-0172-C-1.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

The petition is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
564 F. App'x 1026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-howard-cafc-2014.