in Re Houston Chronicle Publishing Company and Peggy O'Hare

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Houston Chronicle Publishing Company and Peggy O'Hare

DecidedMarch 27, 2006

Docket14-06-00246-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re Houston Chronicle Publishing Company and Peggy O'Hare (in Re Houston Chronicle Publishing Company and Peggy O'Hare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re Houston Chronicle Publishing Company and Peggy O'Hare, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 27, 2006

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 27, 2006.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-00246-CV

IN RE HOUSTON CHRONICLE PUBLISHING COMPANY

and PEGGY O=HARE, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On March 20, 2006, relators, Houston Chronicle Publishing Company and Peggy O=Hare, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1.

Relators have failed to establish their entitlement to mandamus relief and, accordingly, we deny relators= petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 27, 2006.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges, and Justices Yates and Guzman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI