In re Hoskins

114 P.3d 162, 279 Kan. 961
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJuly 1, 2005
DocketBar Docket No. 18,141
StatusPublished

This text of 114 P.3d 162 (In re Hoskins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Hoskins, 114 P.3d 162, 279 Kan. 961 (kan 2005).

Opinion

In a letter dated May 16, 2005, addressed to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, respondent Ronald G. Hoskins of Leawood, Kansas, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in the state of Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 217 (2004 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 296).

At the time the respondent surrendered his license, two complaints had been filed with the Disciplinary Administrator’s office against the respondent. One complaint alleged negligence in the handling of a legal matter and the second complaint alleged misappropriation of funds in the possession of the respondent.

This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that the surrender of the respondent’s license should be accepted and that the respondent should be disbarred.

It Is Therefore Ordered that Ronald G. Hoskins be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of Ronald G. Hoskins from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs herein shall be assessed to the respondent, and that the respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2004 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 301).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 P.3d 162, 279 Kan. 961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hoskins-kan-2005.