In Re Hosford

South Dakota Supreme Court

In Re Hosford

265 N.W. 598, 64 S.D. 161, 1936 S.D. LEXIS 20

CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 7, 1936

DocketFile No. 7110.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 265 N.W. 598 (In Re Hosford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Hosford, 265 N.W. 598, 64 S.D. 161, 1936 S.D. LEXIS 20 (S.D. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

The above-entitled applicant, having been disbarred from the practice of law by previous opinion of this court (In re Hosford,62 S.D. 374, 252 N.W. 843), has made application for reinstatement; the Attorney General of this state appearing in opposition thereto. Applicant appeared in person and by counsel, and the matter has been fully submitted to, and considered by, the court. From the petition and facts presented in support thereof when considered with the previous record of the applicant, the same are deemed insufficient to warrant his reinstatement. The judges are of the opinion, therefore, that said application should be denied.

Hon. H.R. HANLEY, the Judge of the Seventh Circuit, and Hon. FRANK R. FISHER, one of the Judges of the Ninth Circuit, sitting in place of Judges POLLEY and ROBERTS, disqualified. *Page 162

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The above-entitled applicant, having been disbarred from the practice of law by previous opinion of this court (In re Hosford,62 S.D. 374, 252 N.W. 843), has made application for reinstatement; the Attorney General of this state appearing in opposition thereto. Applicant appeared in person and by counsel, and the matter has been fully submitted to, and considered by, the court. From the petition and facts presented in support thereof when considered with the previous record of the applicant, the same are deemed insufficient to warrant his reinstatement. The judges are of the opinion, therefore, that said application should be denied.

Hon. H.R. HANLEY, the Judge of the Seventh Circuit, and Hon. FRANK R. FISHER, one of the Judges of the Ninth Circuit, sitting in place of Judges POLLEY and ROBERTS, disqualified. *Page 162

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 N.W. 598, 64 S.D. 161, 1936 S.D. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hosford-sd-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack