In re Horwitz

256 A.D. 160, 9 N.Y.S.2d 56, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4664
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 20, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 256 A.D. 160 (In re Horwitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Horwitz, 256 A.D. 160, 9 N.Y.S.2d 56, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4664 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It has been conclusively established that the respondent has been guilty of the practice of accepting retainers, signed in blank, from two laymen whom he knew as runners ” engaged in the business of soliciting negligence cases for attorneys, and that he, either before or after the settlement or other disposition of said cases, paid money to the runners ” as compensation for said retainers. The respondent confessedly accepted thirteen such retainers, twelve of which were accepted between May, 1935, and September, 1936.

He should be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Rothenberg
18 A.D.2d 397 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 A.D. 160, 9 N.Y.S.2d 56, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-horwitz-nyappdiv-1939.