In re Horwitz
This text of 256 A.D. 160 (In re Horwitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It has been conclusively established that the respondent has been guilty of the practice of accepting retainers, signed in blank, from two laymen whom he knew as “ runners ” engaged in the business of soliciting negligence cases for attorneys, and that he, either before or after the settlement or other disposition of said cases, paid money to the “ runners ” as compensation for said retainers. The respondent confessedly accepted thirteen such retainers, twelve of which were accepted between May, 1935, and September, 1936.
He should be disbarred.
Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.
Respondent disbarred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 A.D. 160, 9 N.Y.S.2d 56, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-horwitz-nyappdiv-1939.