In re Horton

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Horton

308 S.E.2d 364, 279 S.C. 398, 1983 S.C. LEXIS 381

DecidedOctober 12, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 308 S.E.2d 364 (In re Horton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Horton, 308 S.E.2d 364, 279 S.C. 398, 1983 S.C. LEXIS 381 (S.C. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The records in the office of the Clerk of The Supreme Court show that, on July 16,1953, Thomas H. Horton was admitted and enrolled as a member of the Bar of this State.

In a letter addressed to The South Carolina Bar, dated February 25, 1983, Thomas H. Horton requested that his resignation be accepted. Thomas H. Horton’s letter is made a part of this Order.

It is, therefore, ordered that the resignation of Thomas H. Horton be accepted. He shall forthwith, within five days, deliver to the Clerk of The Supreme Court his Certificate of Admission to practice law in this State, and his name shall be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

THOMAS H. HORTON

3420 Somerset Trace, Marietta, Ga. 30067

Feb. 25,1983

The South Carolina Bar

Columbia, S. C.

Gentlemen:

Please consider this letter as notice of my resignation from the South Carolina Bar. The reason for this action is that I cannot meet the requirements of the continuing education commission.

If at a later date I am able to apply for reinstatement, I will contact you. It is with deep regret that I take this action and I hope to some day renew my affiliation.

Sincerely yours,

s/ Thomas H. Horton

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI