In re Horton

624 A.2d 1367, 132 N.J. 266, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 119
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 8, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

RICHARD G. HORTON of SOMERSET, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1977, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RICHARD G. HORTON is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by RICHARD G. HORTON, pursuant to Rule 1:21-6, shall be restrained from disbursement except upon application to this Court, for good cause shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund, pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Horton, 624 A.2d 1367, 132 N.J. 266, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 119 (N.J. 1993).

624 A.2d 1367 (In re Horton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Riva
722 A.2d 933 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1999)