In re Horner

New York Supreme Court

In re Horner

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 39

New York Supreme Court·Decided August 21, 1902·Published

Opinion

Hall, J.:

A careful examination of the testimony in this case, allowing full weight to all the evidence and exhibits offered by the respondent, in my opinion, brings it squarely within the doc[40]*40trine laid down in Re Selmyler (63 App. Div. 206). The facts in the two cases are very similar. The petitioner is entitled to judgment revoking the certificate, with costs.

Settle form of judgment on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall, J.:

A careful examination of the testimony in this case, allowing full weight to all the evidence and exhibits offered by the respondent, in my opinion, brings it squarely within the doc[40]*40trine laid down in Re Selmyler (63 App. Div. 206). The facts in the two cases are very similar. The petitioner is entitled to judgment revoking the certificate, with costs.

Settle form of judgment on notice.

In re Horner, 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 39 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1902).

Pincite

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 39 (In re Horner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related