In re Horn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Horn

201 A.D.2d 816, 607 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1149

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 201 A.D.2d 816 (In re Horn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Horn, 201 A.D.2d 816, 607 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 12, 1993, which assessed REH Marketing Company for additional unemployment insurance contributions.

Substantial evidence exists in the record to support the Board’s conclusion that Randi Horn, doing business as REH Marketing Company, a partnership, exercised sufficient direction and control over the product demonstrators to establish their status as employees. Once the demonstrators accepted an assignment from REH Marketing, it mailed them all pertinent paperwork about the job, including detailed invoice forms, [817]*817instruction sheets and samples. The demonstrators were paid on a weekly basis upon completion of the invoices. Payment was made even if the product manufacturer had not paid REH Marketing yet. The demonstrators were also reimbursed for certain types of expenses. Finally, the fact that the demonstrators’ contracts stated that they were independent contractors is not determinative.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 12, 1993, which assessed REH Marketing Company for additional unemployment insurance contributions.

Substantial evidence exists in the record to support the Board’s conclusion that Randi Horn, doing business as REH Marketing Company, a partnership, exercised sufficient direction and control over the product demonstrators to establish their status as employees. Once the demonstrators accepted an assignment from REH Marketing, it mailed them all pertinent paperwork about the job, including detailed invoice forms, [817]*817instruction sheets and samples. The demonstrators were paid on a weekly basis upon completion of the invoices. Payment was made even if the product manufacturer had not paid REH Marketing yet. The demonstrators were also reimbursed for certain types of expenses. Finally, the fact that the demonstrators’ contracts stated that they were independent contractors is not determinative.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 816, 607 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-horn-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack