In re Hopson
1 Edw. Ch. 8
Opinion
The petition does not set forth a single circumstance of misconduct on the part of the late guardian. But even if it did, I find no case where a person can be called upon to account through a petition, ¿fter the period of his guardianship has ceased. If the petitioner were under age, then; Under the rules and practice of the court, a bill Would be unnecessary.
In this case, the relation of guardian and ward has ceased; and the former is no longer an officer of the court. If the petitioner has any claim, he must file a bill.
Motion denied, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Hopson, 1 Edw. Ch. 8 (N.Y. 1831).
1 Edw. Ch. 8 (In re Hopson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City
438 U.S. 104 (Supreme Court, 1978)
Blanchard Lumber Company v. Ss Anthony II
259 F. Supp. 857 (S.D. New York, 1966)
Sincoff v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance
183 N.E.2d 899 (New York Court of Appeals, 1962)
Ohio Ex Rel. Eaton v. Price
364 U.S. 263 (Supreme Court, 1960)
State ex rel. Eaton v. Price
85 Ohio Law. Abs. 49 (Supreme Court, 1960)
Frank v. Maryland
359 U.S. 360 (Supreme Court, 1959)
Javna v. DJ Fredricks, Inc.
125 A.2d 227 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Tennessee Co.
111 F.2d 678 (Third Circuit, 1940)