In Re: Honeywell International Inc.
This text of In Re: Honeywell International Inc. (In Re: Honeywell International Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., Appellant ______________________
2016-1839 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,037. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
ROBERT WILLIAM MOLITORS, Miles & Stockbridge PC, Tysons Corner, VA, argued for appellant. Also represent- ed by KURT CHARLES ROMMEL, MICHAEL ANTHONY MESSINA.
MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria Virginia, argued for Intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLY, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, JOSEPH MATAL, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MOLLY R. SILFEN. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (TARANTO, SCHALL, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 6, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Honeywell International Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-honeywell-international-inc-cafc-2017.