In re Honeycutt

358 N.C. 728
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJuly 28, 2004
DocketNo. 317P04
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 358 N.C. 728 (In re Honeycutt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Honeycutt, 358 N.C. 728 (S.C. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

Petitioners’ Petition for Writ of Mandamus is allowed. Pursuant to Article IV of the Constitution of North Carolina, Article 7A of the General Statutes of North Carolina, and the inherent supervisory authority of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, District Court Judge James M. Honeycutt is ordered to comply with North Carolina General Statute Sections 11-1 through 11-11 in the administration of oaths. Pursuant to that same authority, District Court Judge James M. Honeycutt is ordered to permit court to be opened with a proclamation which shall include the customary phrase, “God save the state and this honorable court.”

By order of the Court in Conference, this 28th day of June, 2004.

s/Lake, Jr., C.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Honeycutt
600 S.E.2d 470 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
358 N.C. 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-honeycutt-sc-2004.