In re Homan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Homan

948 A.2d 1268, 195 N.J. 185, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 786

DecidedJune 12, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 948 A.2d 1268 (In re Homan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Homan, 948 A.2d 1268, 195 N.J. 185, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 786 (N.J. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-311, concluding that WARREN W. HOMAN of CARNEYS POINT, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1966, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 3.4(b) (falsifying evidence), RPC 8.1(a) (knowingly making a false statement of material fact to disciplinary authorities), RPC 8.4(b) (committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a censure is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WARREN W. HOMAN is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-311, concluding that WARREN W. HOMAN of CARNEYS POINT, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1966, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 3.4(b) (falsifying evidence), RPC 8.1(a) (knowingly making a false statement of material fact to disciplinary authorities), RPC 8.4(b) (committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a censure is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WARREN W. HOMAN is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

948 A.2d 1268, 195 N.J. 185, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-homan-nj-2008.